Hearing from A Rasika Acarya?

by James Mc Donough Jr.
[Formerly Tridandisvami Bhaktivedanta Bhakti Sar, Dhrystadyumna das*]

1 April 2002

nama om visnu-padaya krsna-presthaya bhutale
srimate bhaktivedanta svamin iti namine
namaste sarasvate deve gaura-vani pracarine
nirvisesa sunyavadi pascatya desa tarine

This paper is a response to an article entitled "Hearing from A Rasika Acarya" published by Swami B. G. Narasingha through his Krsna Talk e-newsletter.

There are many good statements therein. His article also expresses his sincere point of view regarding the hearing of the Tenth Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam. It seems, however, that our Gaudiya Vaisnava acaryas have a different point of view on this particular subject.

This unqualified servant of Nitya-lila-pravista Om Visnupada Astottara-sata Sri Srimad A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, Dhrstadyumna das, begging his mercy as well as that of all my guru-varga (line of teachers), now presents this paper in an inadequate yet heartfelt attempt…

To show the glory of a true rasika-acarya (teacher expert at relishing the mellows of devotional service);
To show the glory of hearing rasa-lila (the Supreme Lord’s divine dance of love with the damsels of Vraja);
To present the siddhanta (philosophical conclusions) of our Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya Vaisnava Sampradaya (disciplic succession);
To show that without sadhu-sanga (the association of saints), apasiddhantic confusion (heretical philosophical conclusions) will spread around the world in the name of Gaudiya Vaisnavism.

For fairness and thoroughness, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s entire article is being presented as is in its original sequence; albeit, broken into separate sections entitled "Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja".

Each "Statement…." is then followed by a "Response". In some cases, emphasis has been added in bold type to highlight a major point or issue. The reader may refer to the Endnotes to review the source materials for all quoted statements. In Microsoft Word 97 and later, highlighting the Endnote’s number with the cursor will cause the Endnote to appear. And also in some internet browser versions, the reader can also click or double-click the number to toggle back and forth between the main body of this paper and its corresponding Endnote.

Opening Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Srila Bhakti Raksak Sridhar Dev Goswami: "Srila Viswanatha Cakravarti Thakura has mentioned that one should first come to the stage of anartha-nivrithi¹ before attempting to hear the rasa-lila topics."

Response:

As a preamble to, and theme for, his article, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja attributes this quote, which is isolated from its larger context, to Srila Bhakti Raksak Sridhar Gosvami Maharaja.

However:
1. Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has not specified where Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura has written this.
2. These Responses will be presenting quotes directly from Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura and other Rupanuga Gaudiya Vaisnava acaryas further on.
3. Srila B. R. Sridhar Gosvami Maharaja does not differ from the other acaryas in our line.
4. Even at the stage of anartha-nivrtti one can have lusty and other material desires.²
5. There are many gradations of anartha-nivrtti, some of which continue even past the stage of bhava. ³
Therefore, I pray, that after reading all these Responses to follow, the dear reader will:
1. Appreciate that the highest good (sreyah uttamam) can be obtained by anyone who hears krsna-katha (discussions of Krsna’s pastimes) with faith from a bona-fide rasika-acarya.
2. Have a clear understanding of the topic’s dynamic application by current and past acaryas.
3. Recognize that Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has–on this occasion–presented a conclusion that is radically different from Rupanuga Gaudiya Vaisnava siddhanta.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Question: Is it true that to make advancement in Krsna consciousness one should hear from a rasika-acarya (a spiritual master advanced in relishing mellows of pure devotion) on the level of Viswanatha Cakravarthi Thakura?

Answer: One who has lived in either Vrindavana or Navadwip for some time knows that the sahajiya section is quite fond of this sort of explanation. But such emphasis is not entirely fact.

Response:

Of course, different types of advancement in Krsna consciousness can be made in so many ways, but if one wants to realize Vraja-lila of Radha-Krsna, it is absolutely essential to hear rasa-lila katha from a bona-fide, fully-rasika devotee. As Srila Narottama dasa Thakur sings in his prayer, Sri Radha-nistha:

tara bhakta sange sada, rasa-lila prema katha,
je kore se paya ghanasyama
ihate bimukha jei, tara kabhu siddhi nai,
nahi jena suni tara nama

"A person who stays in the company of the devotees who are always discussing the sweet, nectarean pastimes of the rasa dance (rasa-lila prema katha) is sure to attain Ghanasyama, who is dark like a monsoon raincloud. A person averse to hearing these lilas will never attain perfection. I refuse to hear his name."⁴

The word ‘rasika’ is not a bad word and is certainly not synonymous with sahajiya. Both Srila Krsna das Kaviraja Gosvami and Srila Vyasadeva use the word ‘rasika’:

….ataeva kahi kichu karina nigudha

bujhibe rasika bhakta, na bujhibe mudha….

"All these conclusions are unfit to disclose in public. But if they are not disclosed, no one will understand them. Therefore I shall mention them, revealing only their essence, so that loving devotees (rasika bhaktas) will understand them but fools will not. Anyone who has captured Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Lord Nityananda Prabhu in his heart will become blissful by hearing all these transcendental conclusions. All these conclusions are like the newly grown twigs of a mango tree; they are always pleasing to the devotees, who in this way resemble cuckoo birds."(Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila, Chapter 4, Texts 231-234)⁵

It is interesting to note that only rasika bhaktas can understand the full meaning of the conclusions given by Srila Krsna das Kaviraja Gosvami.

Furthermore:

nigama-kalpa-taror galitam phalam
suka-mukhad amrta-drava-samyutam
pibata bhagavatam rasam alayam
muhur aho rasika bhuvi bhavukah

"O expert and thoughtful men, relish Srimad-Bhagavatam, the mature fruit of the desire tree of Vedic literatures. It emanated from the lips of Sri Sukadeva Goswami. Therefore this fruit has become even more tasteful, although its nectarean juice was already relishable for all, including liberated souls." (Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.1.3)⁶

Here, the word rasika is translated in the synonyms as "those who are full in the knowledge of mellows".

The word ‘rasa’ is also not a bad word. It can mean different things according to the context in which it is used. As we learn from Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, a primary meaning is that rasa is one's relationship with Krsna:

"Therefore Bhagavad-gita is best understood by a person who has qualities similar to Arjuna’s. That is to say he must be a devotee in a direct relationship with the Lord. As soon as one becomes a devotee of the Lord, he also has a direct relationship with the Lord. That is a very elaborate subject matter, but briefly it can be stated that a devotee is in a relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead in one of five different ways:

1. One may be a devotee in a passive state; (santa rasa)

2. One may be a devotee in an active state; (dasya rasa)

3. One may be a devotee as a friend; (sakhya rasa)

4. One may be a devotee as a parent; (vatsalya rasa)

5. One may be a devotee as a conjugal lover. (madhurya rasa)

Arjuna was in a relationship with the Lord as friend. Of course there is a gulf of difference between this friendship and the friendship found in the material world. This is transcendental friendship, which cannot be had by everyone. Of course everyone has a particular relationship with the Lord, and that relationship is evoked by the perfection of devotional service. But in the present status of our life, not only have we forgotten the Supreme Lord, but we have forgotten our eternal relationship with the Lord. Every living being, out of the many, many billions and trillions of living beings, has a particular relationship with the Lord eternally. That is called svarupa. By the process of devotional service, one can revive that svarupa, and that stage is called svarupa-siddhi–perfection of one’s constitutional position." (Bhagavad-gita As It Is, Introduction)⁷

So here at the beginning of his paper, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has made an attempt to align the concept of rasika-acarya with sahajiyaism in the minds of his readers. It is inappropriate to cast aspersions on a philosophical conclusion merely on the grounds that it is supported by the sahajiya community. Most of the basics of our bona-fide Gaudiya philosophy are similar to theirs. The differences lie in certain aspects of interpretation and application.⁸

And throughout his article, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja uses such words as, "…not entirely fact" that leave him room to maneuver in case he becomes hard-pressed to defend his thesis.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
acaryera mata yei, sei mata sara tanra ajna langhi’ cale, sei ta’ asara

"The order of the spiritual master is the active principle in spiritual life. Anyone who disobeys the order of the spiritual master immediately becomes useless." (Adi-lila, 12.10)

Devotees who know the science of Krsna consciousness have accepted the above verse as conclusive. This verse states the active principle in spiritual life, the key to spiritual advancement. If one pleases the spiritual master then one very quickly advances in Krsna consciousness, but if one displeases the spiritual master by neglecting his order then one becomes asara or useless.

Srila Viswanatha Cakravarti Thakura in his commentary on the Bhagavad-gita verse vyavasayatmika buddhir / ekeha kuru-nandana (2.41) states that it is the duty of a disciple to strictly follow the orders of his spiritual master. Viswanatha writes as follows: "The instructions that my gurudeva has given me about sravanam, kirtanam, smaranam, pada-sevanam, etc. of Sri Bhagavan are my very sadhana, my very sadhya and my very life. I am unable to relinquish them in either the sadhana stage or in sadhya. My single desire and only engagement is to follow them. Besides this, I have no other desire or engagement, even in my dreams. There is no loss for me, whether by following these instructions I attain happiness or misery, or whether my material life is destroyed or not." (As published by Gaudiya Vedanta Samiti)

This is the open secret of success for advancement in spiritual life. One must have firm faith in the orders of the spiritual master and follow his orders wholeheartedly. The Vedas also confirm:

yasya deve para bhaktir yatha deve tatha gurau

tasyaite kathita hy arthah prakasante mahatmanah

"To one who has staunch faith in the words of the spiritual master and the words of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the secret of success in Vedic knowledge is revealed."

Response:

We offer our dandavat pranams to these truths. And, in a lecture delivered by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur Prabhupada at Radha-kunda during Vraja-mandal parikrama in 1932, which was printed in The Gaudiya in 1934, His Divine Grace gave these orders:

"All these days we have not spoken about lila. Why? Because this is our most confidential asset. This is our only sadhya (perfection). But, one should not make the mistake of thinking that anartha-nivrtti (overcoming impediments such as lust and greed) is the prayojana (goal of life). One thinking like this will never enter into artha-pravrtti (acquiring one’s actual need). For this reason, I will begin speaking about astakaliya-lila.

"I know that you are not ready to hear it. But we should know such a transcendental ideal exists within the realm of devotion. This is why anartha-nivrtti is essential. After the realm of anartha-nivrtti is artha-pravrtti, pure conjugal service to Radha and Krsna. This is transcendental reality. If we do not know of this transcendental realm, then all of our efforts may end in nirvisesa-vada (impersonalism). Do not let your day pass in trying for anartha-nivrtti. Artha-pravrtti is also necessary. Anartha-nivrtti is necessary until artha-pravrtti has started. When artha-pravrtti is present then anartha-nivrtti becomes unimportant — artha-pravrtti becomes prominent.

"Those who have chanted hari nama for fifteen or twenty years should know such things. The beginners need not hear these topics or they will misunderstand. These topics are for certain audiences, not for all. Also, it is said, apana bhajana-katha, na kahibe jathatatha, ‘One should not reveal one’s bhajana to others.’ If we disregard this instruction of our previous acaryas then there may be a permanent fall from the realm of devotional service.

"By removing the clothes of the gopis, Krsna obtained happiness; this is Krsna’s sense gratification. If we are to ask, "Why is He a sense enjoyer?’ ‘Let us see Krsna display the behavior of controlling the senses.’ We cannot ask like this, because Krsna will not become a slave to our desires. Krsna, by his own will, can show us sense restraint — He did show it in his form as Gaurasundara. By that example, He is informing us that no one except Krsna has the right to remove the clothes of the gopis. Our duty is to cultivate devotional service.

"Do not think that astakaliya-lila smaranam is the property of the sahajiyas. Actually it is our affair. It has to be retrieved from the hands of the sahajiyas…."

These are also the orders of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura. If we do not follow them, as Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has mentioned, we will become asara, useless.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
It appears that many devotees are now confused about the process of advancement in Krsna consciousness and think that simply by hearing rasa-lila from a so-called rasika-guru that all their troubles will vanish. Perhaps this is an attractive proposal for those who are merely sentiment mongers, but the serious candidate in Krsna consciousness should know that sooner or later such discussion of rasa-lila in an unqualified assembly certainly leads to full-fledged sahajiyaism.

Response:

After implying that the terms "sahajiya" and "rasika" are synonymous, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja now changes the theme of his dissertation to "Hearing from A So-Called Rasika Acarya".

Still, his statement above is true, if the rasika-guru is ‘so-called’. However, if he is real, then the result will be different.

Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura is not a ‘so called rasika-guru’. He is an actual rasika-guru. He is one of the most prominent Vaisnava acaryas of the Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya Vaisnava Sampradaya. Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada often quotes his commentaries in his own Bhaktivedanta purports. In delineating the 64 limbs of bhakti in his Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu-bindu, Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura writes:

Rasika-saha sri bhagavatarthasvadah

(Tasting the meaning of Srimad-Bhagavatam in the association of Rasika Vaisnavas)

"The delightfully sweet essence (rasa) of the wish-fulfilling tree of Vedic literature is Srimad-Bhagavatam. In the association of persons who are estranged from that rasa there can be no tasting of the rasa of Srimad-Bhagavatam; rather there can only be aparadha. One should taste the rasa of the slokas of Srimad-Bhagavatam in the association of pure devotees who are thoroughly versed in understanding the rasa of the Bhagavatam and who are possessed of deep yearning to taste the rasa of Krsna-lila. Suddha-bhakti does not arise by hearing or reciting Srimad-Bhagavatam in an assembly of ordinary persons." (Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu-bindu, Ch. 4, Anga 61)⁹

Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada isSripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s diksa-guru and definitely not a sahajiya. Yet, he writes in his "Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead":

"Discussion of the rasa-lila among people in general is not recommended because they are affected by the Mayavada philosophy, but if one who is advanced explains and people hear from him, certainly the hearers will be gradually elevated to the position of Krsna consciousness and liberated from materially contaminated life….Sukadeva Goswami concludes this episode of rasa-lila by pointing out that if a person hears from the right source the pastimes of Krsna, who is Visnu Himself, and the gopis, who are expansions of His energy, then he will be relieved from the most dangerous type of disease, namely lust. In other words, one who actually hears the rasa-lila will become completely freed from the lusty desire of sex life and elevated to the highest level of spiritual understanding. The conditioned soul should hear the rasa-lila dance from an authorized spiritual master and be trained by him so that he can understand the whole situation; thus one can be elevated to the highest standard of spiritual life; otherwise one will be implicated. Material lust is a kind of heart disease, and to cure the material heart disease of the conditioned soul, it is recommended that one should hear, but not from the impersonalist rascals. If one hears from the right sources with right understanding, then his situation will be different."¹⁰

Again, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada defines sahajiyaism:

"So here it is said that yad uttamasloka-gunopalambhaka. We have to... Just like there are some sahajiyas. They think that, ‘Krsna's rasa-lila is very nice, but Krsna's fighting with the demons and killing of the demons, that is not very nice.’ But they do not know the Absolute Truth–that Krsna is as good in any circumstances, either He is enjoying the company of the gopis or He is killing the demon. That is the Absolute Truth. So these things should be understood."¹¹

And, in Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila 4.30, he describes the correct understanding:

"The Lord is so merciful that He Himself descends to take the fallen souls back home to the Kingdom of Godhead where the erotic principles of Godhead are eternally relished in their real form, distinct from the perverted sexual love so much adored and indulged in by the fallen souls in their diseased condition. The reason the Lord displays the rasa-lila is essentially to induce all of the fallen souls to give up their diseased morality and religiosity, and to attract them to the kingdom of God to enjoy the reality. A person who actually understands what is rasa-lila will certainly hate to indulge in mundane sex life"¹²

Not only rasa-lila, but all topics of Srimad-Bhagavatam, namely the parts about Dhruva Maharaja, Lord Visnu, Sri Prahlada, Lord Narasingha, and Lord Brahma are all best heard from the lips of rasika-acaryas.

In Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila 4.34, Srila Krsna dasa Kaviraja Goswami quotes from Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.36:

anugrahaya bhaktanam manusam deham asritah

bhajate tadrsih krida yah srutva tat-paro bhavet

"In order to show mercy upon the devotees as well as the conditioned souls, Sri Krsna manifests his human-like form and performs such extraordinary pastimes (rasa-lila) that anyone who hears them becomes exclusively devoted to them."¹³

Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada writes in his purport to the above verse:

"…The rasa dance is arranged by Krsna’s internal potency yogamaya, and it is beyond the grasp of the materially affected person. Trying to throw mud into transcendence with their perversity, the sahajiyas misinterpret the sayings tat-paratvena nirmalam and tat-paro bhavet. By misinterpreting tadrsih kridah, they want to indulge in sex while pretending to imitate Lord Krsna. But one must actually understand the imports of the words through the intelligence of the authorized gosvamis. Srila Narottama dasa Thakura, in his prayers to the Gosvamis, has explained his inability to understand such spiritual affairs:

rupa-raghunatha-pade hoibe akuti

kabe hama bujhabo se yugala-piriti

‘When I shall be eager to understand the literature given by the Gosvamis, then I shall be able to understand the transcendental love affairs of Radha and Krsna.’

In other words, unless one is trained under the disciplic succession of the Gosvamis, one cannot understand Radha and Krsna…" (Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila, Chapter 4, Text 34, Purport)¹⁴

In the above purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada is writing that one must hear, but not from those who will misinterpret. One must hear from those on the level of the six Gosvamis, and they are all rasika-acaryas.

Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada translates the next verse, as follows:

"Here the use of the verb "bhavet," which is in the imperative mood, tells us that this certainly must be done. Noncompliance would be abandonment of duty." (Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila, Chapter 4, Text 35)¹⁵

Srila Jiva Gosvami’s comments in his Vaisnava Tosani on the above quoted Srimad-Bhagavatam verse from rasa-lila (10.33.36):

"tatra loke'dhisthatrtvena krsnakhya narakara parabrahmanah sri gopair anubhutatvut evam bhaktanugrahartham tat kridety abhipretam. aptakama tve'pi bhaktanugraho yujuate. visuddha sattvasya tatha svabhavat. yad bhava bhavite canyatra drsyate 'sau. tatha rahugananugrahake sri jada bharata carite, yatha va bhagavad anugrahake mayiti ca. tatra bhakta sabdena braja devyo braja janas ca sarve kala-traya sambandhino 'nye ca vaisnava grhitam–braja devinam purva-ragadibhir braja jananam janmadibhir anyesan ca bhakta darsana sravanadibhir apurvatva sphuranat. ataeva tadrsa bhakta prasangena tadrsih sarva cittakarsinih krida bhajate, yah sadharanir api srutva bhaktebho 'nyo 'pi janas tatparo bhavet. kimuta rasa lila rupam imam srutvety arthah. vaksyate ca–vikriditam vraja-vadhubhir idan ca visnoh (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.39) ityadi. yad va, manusam deham asritah sarvo 'pi jivas tatparo bhavet, martya loke sri bhagavad avatarat tatha bhajane mukhyatvac ca manusyanam eva sukhena tac chravanadi siddeh. bhutanam iti pathe nijavatara karana bhakta sambandhena sarvesam eva jananam visayinam mumuksunam muktanan cety arthah. iti parama karunyam eva karanam uktam. tathapi bhajana sambandhenaiva sarvanugraho jneyah. anyattaih. tatra bahirmukhanapiti tatparyantatvam vivaksitam, parama prema parakastha mayataya sri sukasyapi tad varnanatisaya pravrtteh gopinam ity asyarthantare tv evam vyakhyeyam.

"The words anugrahaya bhaktanam manusam deham asritah indicate that the Supreme Lord Sri Krsna appears in His original human-like form and performs various pastimes in order to bestow favor upon His devotees. Therefore, although Sri Krsna is satisfied in Himself (aptakama), His display of kindness toward the devotees is quite appropriate. This is the distinctive characteristic of visuddha-sattva (pure goodness). The Lord is always prepared to reward the devotees with a result consistent with their performance of bhajana. The favor shown toward King Rahugana by Sri Jada Bharata and the Lord’s favor toward Sukadeva Gosvami illustrates this.

"In the verse under discussion, it is said that the Lord manifests His form and pastimes in order to bestow favor upon His devotees. The word bhakta used here refers to the Vraja-devis (the gopis), the Vrajavasis (residents of Vraja) and all other Vaisnavas–past, present and future. In order to bestow favor upon the vraja-devis, Svayam Bhagavan Sri Krsna lovingly executes such pastimes as purva-raga (the attachment in anticipation of meeting Krsna prior to their union). To bestow mercy upon all the residents of Vraja, He enacts His birth and other pastimes, and by all His activities, He bestows favor upon past, present and future devotees through the medium of hearing lila-katha.

"Sri Krsna manifests all these pastimes to benefit the devotees. By so doing, even ordinary persons (other than the devotees) who hear even the more common of the Lord’s pastimes become fully intent upon the Lord. Therefore, by hearing the supremely ambrosial rasa-lila, ordinary persons will certainly become exclusively devoted to the Lord–of this there can be no doubt. This fact will be elaborately discussed in subsequent verses such as vikriditam vraja-vadhubhir idam ca visnoh (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.39).

"The words manusam deham asritah may also indicate that those jivas who have attained the human form of life are able to hear all these pastimes, and thus they become exclusively devoted to the Supreme Lord. This is so because the Lord incarnates exclusively on the earthly planets (martya-loka), and it is here only that worship of the Lord takes on its predominant form. Consequently, the human beings residing on the earthly planets may easily hear these narrations of the Lord’s pastimes.

"The word bhaktanam appears in this verse. But in some other editions, the word bhutanam is found in its place. In that case, the purport would be as follows: the Lord incarnates only for the sake of the devotees. As a result, the devotees are the root cause of the Lord’s appearance. The Lord also appears in His original human-like form in order to bestow His favor upon the liberated souls (muktas), the aspirants for liberation (mumuksus), sense enjoyers (visayis), and all living entities in accordance with their relationship with the devotees. The Lord’s compassion is therefore said to be the cause of His appearance. Nevertheless, it must be understood that the Lord’s favor toward other living entities is due only to their relationship with His devotees. In other words, the Lord bestows favor upon jivas only because of their connection with devotees."¹⁶

And, furthermore:

"In his Bhagavatam commentary known as Bhavartha-dipika, Srila Sridhara Svami has written that, what to speak of the devotees, even materialistic persons are freed from their material absorption by hearing the Lord’s pastimes, and thus they become exclusively fixed on Him."¹⁷

Regarding 10.33.36, beginning "anugrahaya bhaktanam", Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura has commented:

Bhaktanam anugrahaya tadrsih kridah bhajate yah srutva manusam deham asritah jivah tatparas tad visa yakah sraddhavan bhaved iti kridantar ato vailaksanyena madhurya rasamayah asyah kridayas tadrsi mani-mantra-mahausadhanam iva kacid atarkya saktir astity avagamyate.

"The Lord performs varieties of pastimes to show favor to His devotees. Having adopted the human form of life, living entities who hear these pastimes become exclusively devoted unto the Lord. In other words, they develop firm faith in hearing the narrations of the Lord’s activities. What more shall I say about the importance of hearing lila-katha? And this rasa-lila, being fully imbued with madhurya-rasa, is eminently distinguished even from the Lord’s other pastimes. Like a jewel, a mantra, or a powerful medicine, this rasa-lila is endowed with such indisputable, astonishing potency that by hearing it, all persons in the human form become devoted to the Supreme Lord. Therefore all varieties of devotees who hear the descriptions of these pastimes will be successful and obtain supreme pleasure. Can there be any question of doubt in this regard?"¹⁸
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
To support their claims of righteousness in hearing rasa-lila, the so-called rasika-gurus of the sentiment mongers like to quote the following Bhagavatam verse in support of their speculation:
The statement made here, sraddha anvitah is that one who has full faith will attain the Lord's pure devotional service by hearing and chanting the Lord's pastimes with the young gopis. While commenting on this verse Srila Viswanatha Cakravarti Thakura has mentioned that one should first come to the stage of anartha-nivrithi before attempting to hear the rasa-lila topics. It is sometimes taken that sraddha anvitah or full faith means anartha-nivrithi, the stage of being free from misconception and unwanted disturbances in the heart. In that stage one achieves bhaktim param bhagavati, pure devotional service and hrd-rogam the disease of the heart is vanquished forever.

Response:

This verse is found in the Srimad-Bhagavatam, Tenth Canto, Chapter 33, Text 39. Now the heart of this topic is arrived at.

The gentle reader is entreated to carefully and patiently understand the vast difference between the interpretation of the words sraddha-anvitah given by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja, and the explanations given in the writings of the acaryas.

Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja states that to hear rasa-katha, one must "first come to the stage of anartha-nivrtti", which he defines as "freedom from anarthas–misconceptions and unwanted disturbances in the heart".

According to Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura in his Madhurya Kadambini, anartha-nivrtti is a stage that actually begins in bhajana-kriya when anarthas start to be eradicated. This process of eradication has five gradations–limited or partial (eka-desa-vartini), pervasive (bahu-desa-vartini), almost complete (prayiki), complete (purna), and absolute (atyantiki).²⁰

There is a common misconception that anartha-nivrtti is completed and then one enters the stage of nistha. This idea is completely wrong. The stage of anartha-nivrtti extends in various forms even past the stage of rati or bhava into prema.²¹

It is therefore unclear at which point in the stage of anartha-nivrtti Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja feels the aspirant becomes qualified to hear rasa-lila.

Anyway, at whatever point in anartha-nivrtti he means, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s conception is:
1. One only now becomes qualified to hear rasa-lila;
2. To hear rasa-lila at this point will permanently bar such unwanted disturbances from ever returning into the heart of such an advanced listener.
He cites Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura as his authority, but without presenting the actual Sanskrit commentary (called Sarartha Darasini Vrtti) and its English translation.

On the other hand, both are presented here now. And this will show conclusively that Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura says that one must hear rasa-lila katha from pure rasika Vaisnavas in order to even attain the stage of anartha-nivrtti.
Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja states: "It is sometimes taken that sraddha anvitah or full faith means anartha-nivrithi, the stage of being free from misconception and unwanted disturbances in the heart."

Firstly, it would be helpful if Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja would inform his reader who is the anonymous "it" who has "sometimes taken" this meaning that the reader is being asked to accept. If "it is sometimes taken" one way, does that mean that "it is sometimes taken" another equally valid way, or even ways also?

It may be that some Vaisnava has spoken like this in an informal context. However, this form of vague reference to an unacknowledged authority without scriptural support or context is not appreciated in the field of philosophical journalism.

Secondly, sraddha (faith) is the first stage on the path leading to prema (adau sraddha…; again, please refer to Endnote 1). If Srila Sukadeva Gosvami wanted to refer to the stage of "anartha-nivrithi, the stage of being free from misconception and unwanted disturbances in the heart", as Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has pointed out, then he could have used the word, nistha, or anartha-nivrtti, or ruci, or bhava. As shown earlier, anartha-nivrtti doesn't necessarily mean one is free yet. However, Srila Sukadeva Gosvami has only used the word sraddha because his meaning is something quite distinct from the conception of Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja. This is unequivocally confirmed by the commentaries of Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, Srila Jiva Gosvami, Srila Sridhar Svami and other prominent acaryas.

Srila Jiva Gosvami states:
In other words, it is not necessary for the hearer to be completely anartha-nivrtti, but the hearer must have the deep conviction that, "No matter how fallen I may be, the narration of Sri Sri Radha-Krsna’s rasa-lila is so powerful that by hearing from the proper source, transcendental vraja-bhakti in the mood of the gopis will surely manifest in my heart." This opinion is upheld by the commentaries of our acaryas, which are being presented in both Sanskrit or Bengali, (in most cases²⁴) and English throughout these Responses.

Again, Srila Narottama das Thakura, who is accepted on the same level of rasika-acarya as Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura by all Gaudiya Vaisnavas, writes, and Gaudiya Vaisnavas sing daily:
There are at least 11 full or partial references to this verse by Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Here is a sampling. In one case, he appears to contradict himself in his explanation of this verse. A humble attempt will be made herein to present evidence that reconciles this apparent contradiction.
1. "But actually, sastra says if one hears rasa-lila, then that lusty desires will be finished: vikriditam idam ca visnoh vraja-vadhubhir…hrd-rogam asv apahinoty acirena dhirah. That is the result. If one actually hears from the right source, then this lusty desire of sex life will be finished. No more. Hrd-rogam kamam apahinoty acirena dhirah. Sober." ²⁶
2. "The conditioned soul should hear the rasa-lila dance from an authorized spiritual master and be trained by him so that he can understand the whole situation; thus one can be elevated to the highest standard of spiritual life…."
  And the listener can also be bona-fide, even with lusty desires still in the heart:
3. "If a bona-fide listener hears of Krsna’s pastimes with the gopis, which seem to be lusty affairs, the lusty desires in his heart, which constitute the heart disease of the conditioned soul, will be vanquished, and he will become a most exalted devotee of the Lord." ²⁸
  Again, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada does not state that one who has anarthas should not hear. Rather, he states that one should not hear from mayavadis and professional reciters:
4. "And bhaktim param bhagavati pratilabhya kama. This is the result. Not that after hearing rasa-lila, ‘Oh, let me imitate. Let me also dance with young girls and enjoy.’ This is going on. Rascal mayavadis they do that. Perhaps you know. There are so many instances. But actually, the result will be this hrd-rogam kamam acirena dhirah. No more desire." ²⁹
According to the aforementioned Statement V of Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja, these quotes qualify Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada as a "so-called rasika-guru of the sentiment mongers." Does he really believe this?

Of course, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada does issue this warning in his purport to Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Madhya-lila, 8.255:
So what are we to do? Reject one set of statements and accept the other? This is exactly what Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja is doing by selectively presenting interpretations that promote caution, or even, forbid aspiring devotees from giving aural reception to rasa-lila katha.

Those who have a clear understanding of the subject matter can never subscribe to this classic case of arddha-kakkuti-nyaya, half-hen logic. The proper thing to do is to reconcile the apparently contradictory statements without committing the mistake of minimizing or invalidating any of the instructions of our respected acaryas.

How can we reconcile Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s statements above?

Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada himself provides the clue in his Teachings of Lord Caitanya, Chapter 32, "Conclusion" in his summary of, and commentary to, the same verse in Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Madhya-lila, 8.255 referred to above:
Yes, the conditioned soul should not "try to hear" rasa-lila katha without proper guidance. This katha descends mercifully from the spiritual world through the medium of a rasika Vaisnava. If the liberated soul–internally inspired by the mercy potency of Krsna–chooses to speak rasa-lila katha, then it is of the highest benefit to all conditioned souls who happen to be present as a result of their past sukrti (devotional credits). In other words, all cautionary or prohibitory statements given by our acaryas in this regard are only to prevent independent attempts to enter into rasa-katha. As always—–‘anugatya’, the principle of being under constant guidance of liberated Vaisnavas, is the essential factor to be extracted from this discussion.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
When Krsna kills a demon, that demon gets liberation and whenever Krsna performs His pastimes of love, the perverted form of love, namely lust in the heart of the living entity, is also vanquished.

Response:

How will Krsna’s pastimes of love vanquish the "lust in the heart of the living entity" if, according to Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja, the living entity can’t hear those pastimes until the lust in his/her heart has been vanquished?

Here, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja seems to reverse his thesis (until his next statement) and come more into line with Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s Introduction to Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, a book which has been distributed in the millions since 1970 to (among others) meat-eaters, illicit-sex mongers, drug addicts, and atheists:
And again, in 1968, in Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s lecture to relatively new devotees on the Appearance Day of Srimati Radharani, the Lord’s pleasure potency:

"So we have described about the Radha-Krsna loving affairs in our Teachings of Lord Caitanya in page 264. If you have got this book, you can read it, how the reciprocation of loving affairs of Radha-Krsna is there, transcendental."³¹

Does Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja accept these statements of his diksa-guru or not?
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Yet hearing the rasa-lila of Krsna and His intimate love affairs with the gopis is never recommended as a method of practice (sadhana) by anyone who actually knows the science of Krsna.

Response:

Now Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja goes on to state directly that hearing of the rasa-lila is sadhana by anyone who actually knows the science of Krsna."

Never? Anyone? Actually? At last some strong, unambiguous terms–that are totally disproved by Srila Jiva Gosvami. Here is the full statement of Srila Jiva Gosvami in his commentary, Vaisnava Tosani.
Is Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja inferring that Srila Jiva Gosvami doesn’t know the science of Krsna?

Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura’s commentary on Srimad-Bhagavatam (10.47.59) is also relevant to this discussion:
To summarize:
1. Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has stated that hearing rasa-lila katha is never recommended as a form of sadhana;
  Whereas,
2. Srila Jiva Gosvami has stated that such hearing is one of the most powerful forms of sadhana — "parama balavadevedam sadhanam".
The reader is requested to discern for him/her self whose opinion is most valid.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Krsna killed many demons before He manifested His pastimes of love with the gopis. According to Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura, the demons killed by Krsna represented various demoniac tendencies in the hearts of the living entities. Trnavarta represented the personification of argument; Vatasura represented the form of boyhood offenses; Bakasura represented the personification of cheating religion; Aghasura represented the form of cruelty; Dhenukasura represented the ass of blunt judgement; Kaliya represented the personification of malice and Pralambasura represented the personification of impersonalism. All these demons were killed by Krsna. Therefore, one should first rid one's heart of those demoniac tendencies before attempting to hear the love affairs (rasa-lila) of Radha and Krsna. It is only logical.

Response:

Again, it would be helpful to know where Srila Bhaktivinoda’s analysis leaves off and Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s commentary begins.

Moreover, since Bhagavad-gita was spoken after rasa-lila, does this mean that we should not read Bhagavad-gita until we have realized the rasa-lila? Does this mean we cannot hear the killing of Sankhacuda, Aristasura, Kesi, Kamsa, etc., because they follow the rasa-lila descriptions in the Srimad-Bhagavatam? Is this really the point Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura is making here? Is this logical?

Actually, the Absolute Truth is beyond such logic. Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada wrote:
Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada agrees one should not hear from sahajiyas, but he doesn’t say not to hear from pure devotees who are self-realized souls. Rather, he says that such hearing will dispel demoniac tendencies.
And in his Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, he further comments about anugatya, always being under guidance:
All the acaryas in our Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya Vaisnava Sampradaya, especially from Srila Rupa Gosvami, are uttama mahabhagavatas. Because they have the fully clear understanding, they can impart that right understanding.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada has mentioned in his Bhagavatam commentary (2.2.12) that unless one is freed from material sex desire, one should not read or hear topics past the second canto of Bhagavatam. Srila Prabhupada writes as follows:
Response:

Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s initial statement is misleading–whether by intent or poor paraphrasing. In regard to being free from sex desire, in the purport to this verse Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada refers to–"those who recite", not–those who "read or hear", as Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja claims.

Besides this, the words in the original Sanskrit, visaya-lampatyam tyajati, translated as ‘intoxication of sex indulgence,’ means gross sex indulgence, not just desire. One must certainly be free of this in order to recite past the Second Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam.

In the above paragraph Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s use of the words, ‘improper study or hearing’, means hearing from an improper source. The proper source, a self-realized speaker in the disciplic succession, will naturally teach his hearers what to hear, how to hear properly, and how to properly follow.

This is also confirmed as follows in his purport to Srimad-Bhagavatam, Fourth Canto, Chapter 12, Verse 44:

"Whether we hear the pastimes and activities of the Supreme Lord or we hear about the character, reputation and activities of His devotees, they are all one and the same. Neophyte devotees simply try to understand the pastimes of the Lord and are not very interested in hearing about the activities of His devotees, but such discrimination should not be indulged in by any real devotee. Sometimes less intelligent men try to hear about the rasa dance of Krsna and do not take care to hear about other portions of Srimad-Bhagavatam, which they completely avoid. There are professional Bhagavata reciters who abruptly go to the rasa-lila chapters of Srimad-Bhagavatam, as if other portions of Srimad-Bhagavatam were useless. This kind of discrimination and abrupt adoption of the rasa-lila pastimes of the Lord is not approved by the acaryas. A sincere devotee should read every chapter and every word of Srimad-Bhagavatam, for the beginning verses describe that it is the ripened fruit of all Vedic literature. Devotees should not try to avoid even a word of Srimad-Bhagavatam."³⁷
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
It was also told to us by Srila B.P. Puri Goswami Maharaja that his Guru Maharaja, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura, was very strict about reading or hearing even the baby pastimes of Krsna, what to speak of reading or hearing the amorous pastimes of the Lord with the gopis. Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura as a method of practice never recommended such. Therefore, we find that the disciples of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura never indulged in such matters in the course of their preaching activities. Higher topics were always reserved for the most qualified devotees of the Lord. The pastimes of Radha Krsna were never taken to the public or to the ears of the neophyte devotees.

Response:

Our dandavat pranams to nitya-lila-pravista omvisnupada paramahamsa astottara-sata Srila B. P. Puri Gosvami Maharaja, a pure devotee of Sriman Mahaprabhu and the Divine Couple.

However, again, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja uses an apparently paraphrased, isolated bit of anecdotal reference as evidence–without any context (time, place, circumstances and audience)–to support his thesis. He himself knows how easily, and painfully, this type of "evidence" can become misrepresented to many devotees’ spiritual detriment. Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s comments in a letter to Sriman Rupanuga Prabhu dated April 28^th, 1974 concerning Srila B. R. Sridhar Maharaja and other Godbrothers, which was widely circulated in ISKCON and used without regard to other–and later–statements to the contrary, is a well-known example.³⁸

Therefore, these types of anecdotal references are not the proper way to present evidences in a serious sastric discussion.³⁹

Our Response III shows that Sripad B.G. Narasingha Maharaja’s statement here, "Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura as a method of practice never recommended such" is, at best, exaggerated. The patient reader is reminded of this with an excerpt from that portion:

"All these days we have not spoken about lila. Why? Because this is our most confidential asset. This is our only sadhya (perfection). But, one should not make the mistake of thinking that anartha-nivrtti (overcoming impediments such as lust and greed) is the prayojana (goal of life). One thinking like this will never enter into artha-pravrtti (acquiring one’s actual need). For this reason, I will begin speaking about astakaliya-lila. I know that you are not ready to hear it…."⁴⁰

Furthermore, Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja reminds us of the following stricture in the Srimad-Bhagavatam, 10.33.30:

naitat samacarej jatu manasapi hy anisvarah
vinasyaty acaran maudhyad yatharudro ‘bdhijam visam

"In other words, those who are not isvara, the Supreme Lord, who are powerless and subjected to karma, should never imitate the Lord’s pastimes even within their minds. If anyone foolishly imitates Lord Siva by drinking the poison generated from the ocean, he will certainly be destroyed."⁴¹

Then he summarizes the acaryas’ commentaries as follows:
Why does Srila Sukadeva Gosvami bring up this prohibition (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.30) after he has already described the rasa dance to Maharaja Pariksit, in response to Maharaja Pariksit’s concerns about its morality (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.26 and 27)?

Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, in his Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, elaborately describes many reasons. He explains that one should hear with faith and honor from a qualified speaker; but that after hearing, one should never imitate externally–or imagine internally–oneself to be in the position of Krsna.

If only those who are already anartha-nivrtti can hear rasa-lila, what is the necessity for giving them a warning after the fact? According to Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja their hearts are already pure. And, it is accepted that unqualified speakers and unqualified hearers ignore this warning and indulge themselves in illicit fantasies anyway. So who is this prohibition for? The answer can only be sincere hearers who are not yet fully purified.

Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura confirms this in his commentary to Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.26-27:

sri-pariksid uvaca
samsthapanaya dharmasya prasamayetarasya ca
avatirno hi bhagavan amsena jagad-isvarah
sa katham dharma-setunam vakta kartabhiraksita
pratipam acarad brahman para-darabhimarçanam

Translation:

Pariksit Maharaja said: ‘O brahmana, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Lord of the universe, has descended to this earth along with His plenary portion to destroy irreligion and reestablish religious principles. Indeed, He is the original speaker, follower and guardian of moral laws. How, then, could He have violated them by touching other men’s wives?’⁴³

Commentary by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura:

Atha pariksit sabhoparistanam vividhavasanavatam karmi jnani prabhrtinam

Hrdaye sandeha samudbhutamalaksya taducchedartham prcchati-samsthupanayeti

Translation of the Commentary:

As Sukadeva Gosvami was speaking, King Pariksit noticed that some persons seated in the assembly on the bank of the Ganges were harboring doubt about the Lord’s activities. These doubtful persons were karmis, jnanis and others who were not devotees of the Lord. To clear up their doubts, King Pariksit asks this question on their behalf."⁴⁴

Here it is clearly proven that Srila Sukadeva Gosvami spoke rasa-lila to those who were:
1. not anartha-nivrtti
2. not even devotees
Has Srila Sukadeva Gosvami violated his own statement in Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.39? According to Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s interpretation, he has.

One might now humbly ask the following questions of Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
1. Under the guidance of which liberated acarya(s) has he meticulously studied the commentaries of Srila Sanatana Gosvami and Srila Jiva Gosvami, namely Brhat and Laghu Vaisnava Tosanis respectively, and Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, namely Sarartha-darsini?
2. Furthermore, if he has not undergone such a meticulous study under the guidance of a realized acarya(s), does he himself know the Sanskrit language?
If neither of these requirements is fulfilled, then one should be very careful how one airs one’s own opinion in public, lest one become criticized in the community of learned Vaisnavas.

According to one’s sukrtis (pious activities) and samskaras (impressions on the heart from past and present pious and impious activities), one will have taste for hearing from the right or wrong source. Or, one will have no taste at all. As described in the Brhad Naradiya Purana and quoted in Srila Sanatana Gosvami’s Hari-bhakti-vilas, "this sadhu-sanga is not obtained coincidentally. It is the result of sukrti or pious activites accumulated over many, many lifetimes".⁴⁵

bhaktistu bhagavad bhakta sangena parijayate
sat-sanga-prapyate pumbhih sukrtaih purva sancitaih

"Bhakti becomes manifest by the association of the Lord’s devotees. The association of devotees is obtained by previous accumulated piety."⁴⁶

From the above verse one can understand that if a person has an opportunity to hear from a bona-fide speaker, that opportunity is afforded one by dint of one’s qualifications, which have come from one’s past sukrtis and samskaras. Therefore there is no question of a bona-fide speaker having an audience that is unqualified to hear what Sri Krsna, within his heart, is inspiring him to speak.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
There is actually no difference between purely chanting Hare Krsna and the pastimes of Radha Krsna save and except that chanting the holy name is the safer position. Therefore it is advised that one should hear the holy name of Krsna. Srila B.P. Puri Goswami Maharaja was also fond of saying, "Take full shelter of the holy name of Krsna and there will be less commotion and more promotion." Just consider. If while still subject to sex desire one tries to hear the pastimes of Radha and Krsna but fails to control the mind and at that point allows some unwholesome thought to enter, then a great offense will be committed. We have heard from Srila B.R. Sridhara Deva Goswami Maharaja that when such an offense is committed against the lila of the Supreme Lord, the guardians of that plane will take note and the offender may be barred from entering there forever. Certainly this should be taken very seriously. To save us from such an unfortunate end, the recommended process to achieve purification is Krsna-Kirtan (chanting the holy name) and not smaranam (the process of remembrance of lilas). Srimad-Bhagavatam, Srila Jiva Goswami, Krsnadasa Kaviraja Goswami, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura, our Prabhupada and many other stalwarts have all given stress to kirtan as the most effective process for this age.

kaler dosa-nidhe rajann asti hy eko mahan gunah
kirtanad eva krsnasya mukta-sangah param vrajet

"The age of Kali, the repository of all evils, has but one glorious characteristic; in this age, those who simply chant the holy name of Krsna are liberated and reach the Supreme Lord." (Bhag. 12.3.51)

nama-sankirtanam yasya, sarva-papa-pranasanam
pranamo duhka-samanas, tam namami harim param

"Krishna’s holy name can relieve us from all undesirable sinfulness, all filthy characteristics, and all miseries. Let us all bow down to Him." (Bhag. 12.13.23)

bhajanera madhye srestha nava-vidha bhakti
krsna-prema. 'krsna' dite dhare maha-sakti
tara madhye sarva-srestha nama-sankirttana
niraparadhe nama laile paya prema-dhana

"Of all forms of divine service, nine forms are superior, which with great potency bestow upon devotees love of Krsna, and their personal relationship with Him; and of the nine, the best is nama-sankirtan, the congregational chanting of the holy name. By offencelessly taking the holy name, the treasure of love for the Lord is attained." (CC. Antya 4.70,71)

Not only is the process of kirtan recommended by sastra (scripture), all other forms of devotional practice are subservient to kirtan.

yadyapy anya bhaktih kalau karttavya
tada kirtan-akhya-bhakti-samyogenaiva

"In the Kali-yuga, of the nine basic forms of devotional practices, the forms other than kirtan certainly should be practiced, but they must be conducted subserviently to kirtan." (Bhakti-sandarbha, Sankhya 273)

Response:

This is a classic straw-man argument; and, the fault of visaya-antara, deviating from the point in contention.

Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s original topic is whether one who is not "free from unwanted disturbances in the heart" should hear rasa-lila katha from a rasika-acarya. But now he is discussing whether the neophyte should put stress on kirtana or smarana.

Since it is accepted by all acaryas, of all times, that kirtana is prominent and that smarana is only achieved through the medium of kirtana, this is not the point in contention. But it is also a fact that pure kirtana cannot be achieved without proper sravana which is the whole point of this discussion.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
It may be argued that unless the holy name is chanted purely it will not have any effect whereas the pastimes of the Lord are immediately relishable and purifying. But this is a faulty argument. Even before the holy name is chanted purely it has a purifying effect. Nama-bhasa is the stage of chanting before suddha-nama (pure chanting) is reached. Continuous chanting during the stage of nama-bhasa gradually gives us promotion to suddha-nama.

Response:

The sastra warns clearly that continuous chanting during the stage of namabhasa (dim reflection, semblance, or shadow of the holy name) will result eventually in falling down or impersonalism–unless one avails oneself of the fruit of chanting namabhasa in the form of sadhu-sanga.

This is confirmed by Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura in Sri Sanmodana Bhasyam, his commentary on Sri Siksastaka. In the first verse, he explains that one may chant hari-nama, but the seven excellent results of chanting beginning with "ceto-darpana-marjanam…" will not occur unless one regularly hears hari-katha from the lips of self-realized souls. This is a direct quote from his commentary for the pleasure of the reader:

"Even if one of these two types of sraddha arises, suddha-bhakti can develop only by continuous engagement in suddha-hari-katha in the form of sravana and kirtana in the association of unadulterated pure devotees. If one does not regularly engage in such hari-katha in the association of saintly persons, his sraddha will gradually dwindle and then vanish altogether."⁴⁷

In other words, even is one is chanting the holy name, if one does not continually hear pure hari-katha from pure Vaisnavas; eventually one loses all faith in pure krsna-bhakti. Thus, one becomes attracted to sense gratification, impersonalism, or any of the various types of bhakti-abhasa.

Srila Jagadananda Pandita, a personal associate of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, has written in his Prema-vivarta:

Asadhu-sange bhai, krsna nama nahi haya
Namaksara bahiraya bate, tabu nama kabhu naya
….kabhu namabhasa haya, sada nama-aparadha
Jadi koribe krsna-nam sadhu-sanga koro
In sadhu-sanga one will inevitably hear the pastimes of Krsna. This hearing of the pastimes of Krsna nourishes the sambandha-jnana (deep knowledge of one’s intimate relationship with the Supreme Lord) of the sadhaka (practitioner of sadhana); and thus, a very thick relationship with Krsna is established in one’s heart. Only then will the pure name manifest on one’s tongue.

And as Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada cautions (paraphrasing Sanatana Gosvami’s reference to the Padma Purana in his Hari-bhakti-vilas):
In the Srimad-Bhagavatam (3.25.25), the Lord has said:

satam prasangan mama viryasamvido
bhavanti hrt-karna-rasayanah kathah
Again, independent endeavors to realize bhakti either by chanting hari-nama or by remembering krsna-lila have been thoroughly condemned. All attempts to attain perfection that circumvent the unconventional guidance of a rasika-acarya must meet with abject failure.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
The pastimes of the Supreme Lord are supra mundane and cannot be understood or relished by the mundane mind and senses which are covered with lust. Thinking of Radha and Krsna when one is still a conditioned soul, what to speak of when one is suffering from sex desire, is more or less a dreamy thing. That is to say that such so-called neophyte meditation has no actual touch with the plane of reality in which Radha and Krsna are situated. In other words, coming in contact with the lila of Radha and Krsna is not a thing of this world. One must cross many lower planes before coming to the transcendental platform.

upajiya bade lata ‘brahmande bhedi’ yaya ‘viraja’
brahmaloka bhedi’ ‘paravyoma’ paya
tabe yaya tad upari ‘goloka-vrndavana’
krsna-carana’-kalpavrkse kare arohana
This is the death-blow to the sentiment mongers. They want rasa-lila which is situated in the highest plane of divinity, but they want that experience through intellectual adjustment, not by paying the actual price. In the language of Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura such persons are known as pukura-curiwale, pond thieves.

Response:

But what is that price? And who is dreaming?

Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada gives us the real answers to both these questions:
It is interesting to hear Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada himself describe how he took the name for his "International Society for Krsna Consciousness" from the description of raganuga-bhakti (spontaneous devotional service in love) given in Sri Caitanya Caritamrta:
Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja has given all sincere devotees further hints on how we can develop that greed, even when we are not qualified:
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
We find that Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu would sometimes become absorbed in thoughts of the lila of Krsna. When the Lord came in contact with that plane of consciousness He manifested ecstatic symptoms such as trembling, faltering of the voice, and becoming unconscious. He would sometimes sweat blood, and His limbs would sometimes contract within His body. The Lord manifested these symptoms as a result of coming in connection with the transcendental plane.

Srila B.R. Sridhar Deva Goswami Maharaja used to say; "Only we are to conjecture the ideal. But if we think that we have got that, it is finished. We have got something else. It is such a thing, adhoksaja. Any force of our mind or intelligence can never catch it. Avan manasa gocara. It exists transcending our mental speculation and also the consideration of our judiciousness. But still it exists."

Response:
In other words, it is necessary for us to conjecture, or conceive of, that ideal spiritual realm. And only by hearing from pure devotees are we able to conjecture.

Then: "If we think that we have got that, then it is finished. We have got something else."

By such hearing we can remember the pastimes of Krsna and His associates. However, if we artificially imagine that we are already perfect, that we are already in the lilas ourselves, then our attempt to attain that ideal realm is finished. That is sahajiya. If we imagine we are already gopis, and our bodies are spiritual and therefore meant for enjoyment, then "we have got something else."–lust. And we’ll go to hell–"it is finished."

And finally: "It is such a thing, adhoksaja (transcendental). Any force of our mind or intelligence can never catch it. Avan manasa gocara. It exists transcending our mental speculation…."

Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada also quotes the words avan manasa gocara several times. In one example, he says:

".... So therefore Krsna is giving you the knowledge. That you have to hear. Knowledge which you cannot experience by your senses at the present moment, you have to hear from the authority. Avan manasa-gocara. Which is beyond your mind and intelligence, you have to hear from the authority."⁵⁴

Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada further differentiates between proper and improper conjecturing:

"According to Caitanya Mahaprabhu, the chapters of the Srimad-Bhagavatam describing the rasa-lila are not meant for ordinary persons; they are meant for liberated persons only. Therefore these descriptions of the rasa-lila should not be described to ordinary people. Those who are advanced devotees, liberated from material contamination, can try to understand Krsna’s rasa-lila. One must not try to imagine the rasa-lila of Radha and Krsna in mundane terms.

"But even though ordinary hearers of Srimad-Bhagavatam do not know the deep significance of Krsna’s rasa-lila, because they hear about Krsna’s pastimes they become purified. And if they hear from authorized sources, they will be promoted to the transcendental devotional platform. The disease within the heart is lust, the desire to enjoy, and by hearing from authorized sources about Krsna’s pastimes of loving exchanges with the gopis, the deep-rooted lusty desires in the heart will be completely eradicated.

"Unfortunately, most people do not hear the Srimad-Bhagavatam from authoritative sources. They hear only from professional reciters. Therefore they remain materially diseased, full of lusty desires. Some become sahajiya, pretending to be Krsna and Radharani and Her gopi friends. In this way they behave as if they were the supreme enjoyer."⁵⁵

The above sastric quotations support our previous acaryas, as amply demonstrated in these Responses. It is quite different to what appears to be Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s unstated perspective here of Srila B. R. Sridhar Maharaja’s quoted statement.
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Purification of the mind and senses is required if we want to progress to the transcendental plane and that purification is most substantially achieved by taking shelter of the holy name of Krsna. That was the opinion of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu.

ceto-darpana-marjanam bhava-mahadavagni-nirvapanam
sreyah-kairava-candrika-vitaranamvidya-vadhu-jivanam
anandambudhi-vardhanam prati-padam purnamrtasvadanam
sarvatma-snapanam param vijayate sri-krsna-sankirtanam

"Let there be all victory for the chanting of the holy name of Lord Krsna, which can cleanse the mirror of the heart and stop the miseries of the blazing fire of material existence. That chanting is the waxing moon that spreads the white lotus of good fortune for all living beings. It is the life and soul of all education. The chanting of the holy name of Krsna expands the blissful ocean of transcendental life. It gives a cooling effect to everyone and enables one to taste full nectar at every step."

Response:

Our dandavat pranams to the Supreme Personality of Godhead–Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu–and to His Siksastakam. And again, our repeated sastang pranams to Srila Rupa Gosvami, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, and the essence of all their advice as found in the 8^th verse and purport of The Nectar of Instruction (Sri Upadesamrta):

tan-nama-rupa-caritadi-sukirtananu-
smrtyoh kramena rasana-manasi niyojya
tisthan vraje tad-anuragi jananugami
kalam nayed akhilam ity upadesa-saram

"The essence of all advice is that one should utilize one’s full time–twenty-four hours a day–in nicely chanting and remembering the Lord’s divine name, transcendental form, qualities and eternal pastimes, thereby gradually engaging one’s tongue and mind. In this way one should reside in Vraja [Goloka Vrndavana dhama] and serve Krsna under the guidance of devotees. One should follow in the footsteps of the Lord’s beloved devotees, who are deeply attached to His devotional service."

"….Again Srila Rupa Gosvami states in Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu (1.2.295):

seva sadhaka-rupena
siddha-rupena catra hi
tad-bhava-lipsuna karya
vraja-lokanusaratah

"In the transcendental realm of Vraja (Vraja-dhama) one should serve the Supreme Lord, Sri Krsna, with a feeling similar to that of His associates, and one should place himself under the direct guidance of a particular associate of Krsna and should follow in his footsteps. This method is applicable both in the stage of sadhana (spiritual practices executed while in the stage of bondage) and in the stage of sadhya (God realization), when one is a siddha-purusa, or a spiritually perfect soul.’

"Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura has commented as follows upon this verse:

‘One who has not yet developed interest in Krsna consciousness should give up all material motives and train his mind by following the progressive regulative principles, namely chanting and remembering Krsna and His name, form, quality, pastimes and so forth. In this way, after developing a taste for such things, one should try to live in Vrndavana and pass his time constantly remembering Krsna’s name, fame, pastimes and qualities under the direction and protection of an expert devotee. This is the sum and substance of all instruction regarding the cultivation of devotional service.’"⁵⁶
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
Some gentleman has written in a recent publication that anyone who says that we should not listen to the narration of Krsna-lila with the gopis is certainly an atheist. But if we were to follow that line of thinking then even the Mahajanas (great devotees) would have to be considered atheistic. The fact is that those with high regard for Divinity always deal with Divinity with the greatest caution, such that offense should not be committed.

Response:

While Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja does not specify which "gentleman" or "publication" he is referring to, such a statement is found in Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja's Introduction to the second publishing⁵⁷ of his Venu-Gita, page xvi. What Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja failed to recognize in his own statement above is that this is the direct translation from Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura's Sarartha Darsini commentary on Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.39 ("vikriditam vraja-vadhubhir idam ca visnoh…hrd-rogam asv apahinoty acirena dhirah") as mentioned before in Response V. Here is the original Sanskrit of the quote in question:
Here is the translation of Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura’s quote above:
Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja comments as follows:
By Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja’s own line of reasoning, it is not at all possible for any Mahajanas to differ from Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, or vice versa. Does he think that Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura is an ordinary "gentleman" who has failed to exercise "caution, such that offense should not be committed"?
Statement by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja:
The neophytes should therefore not concern themselves with the narration of the lilas of Krsna as much as they should concern themselves with the holy name of Krsna. One should first surrender to the holy name. And if one is a disciple of a bona-fide spiritual master he should first concern himself/herself with the instructions of that spiritual master. That is the way of advancement in Krsna consciousness.

Response:

In this and his previous statement, Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja has oscillated between "great devotees" and "neophytes" so that he appears to be:
1. Inadvertently obfuscating the point he is trying to make; or
2. Genuinely confused about what instruction is meant for whom; or
3. Inadequately expressing his idea clearly. When he states: "The neophytes should therefore not concern themselves with the narration of the lilas of Krsna….", does he mean:
  1. The neophytes should not themselves narrate the lilas of Krsna; or
  2. The neophytes should not hear the narration of the lilas of Krsna from mayavadis and sahajiyas; or
  3. The neophytes should not hear the narration of the lilas of Krsna from expert devotees (rasika-acaryas); or
  4. Children should not hear Krsna Book stories from their parents⁶⁰; or
  5. All of the above?
If perchance he was actually quoting/paraphrasing some other authority without acknowledgment, then it would be helpful if he would clarify his interpretation of their statement within the larger context of that authority’s full discussion.

And, when he follows this with the words, "…as much as they should concern themselves with the holy name of Krsna….", does this mean that he actually thinks it may be all right for the neophytes to "concern themselves with the narration of the lilas of Krsna" now and then?

And if so, under what conditions? Perhaps all the ones that have been delineated in these Responses?
Concluding Remarks:
Therefore, on the grounds of concrete scriptural evidence, it is established that…
1. The highest good (sreyah uttamam) can be obtained by anyone who faithfully hears krsna-katha from a bona-fide rasika-acarya.
2. In his article, "Hearing from A Rasika Acarya", Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja is unable to provide:
  1. reconciliation or harmonization of the various statements of the acaryas and sastras (scriptures) with regard to this topic;
  2. clear understanding of the topic’s dynamic application by current and past acaryas.
3. In his article, "Hearing from A Rasika Acarya", Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja is presenting a one-sided view, generally:
All glories to Sri Guru and Gauranga! Gaura Premanande Hari Hari Bol!

Vaisnava dasanudas, Dhrstadyumna das

The End

Endnotes

adau sraddha tatah sadhu-sango ’tha bhajana-kriya
tato ’nartha-nivrttih syat tato nistha rucis tatah
athasaktis tato bhavas tatah premabhyudancati
sadhakanam ayam premnah pradurbhave bhavet kramah

"In the beginning one must have a preliminary desire for self-realization. This will bring one to the stage of trying to associate with persons who are spiritually elevated. In the next stage one becomes initiated by an elevated spiritual master, and under his instruction the neophyte devotee begins the process of devotional service. By execution of devotional service under the guidance of the spiritual master, one becomes free from all material attachment, attains steadiness in self-realization, and acquires a taste for hearing about the Absolute Personality of Godhead, Sri Krsna. This taste leads one further forward to attachment for Krsna consciousness, which is matured in bhava, or the preliminary stage of transcendental love of God. Real love for God is called prema, the highest perfectional stage of life."

Bhagavad gita As It Is, Chapter 4, Text 10, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT (Bhaktivedanta Book Trust)
Madhurya-kadambini (Cloud Bank of Nectar), Third Shower of Nectar: Mitigation of Inauspicious Elements, Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, translated by Deena Bandhu Dasa with the help of his friends, Vrinda Trust, Nandagram, U.P., 1993
Madhurya-kadambini (Cloud Bank of Nectar), idem.
Sri Gaudiya Giti-guccha, "Sri Radha-nistha", Srila Narottama dasa Thakura, GVP (Gaudiya Vedanta Publications)
Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila, Chapter.4, Verses 231-234, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.1.3, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Bhagavad gita As It Is, Introduction, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
The similarities and differences between Gaudiya and sahajiya are highly technical points that are not the point in contention here and will be dealt with later in a separate paper.
Sri Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu-bindu, Chapter 4, Anga 61
Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Chapter 33: "Description of the Rasa Dance", Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 6.2.11, Lecture, Allahabad, India, January 16th, 1971, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila 4.30, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila 4.34, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Adi-lila 4.35, Verse, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Although not credited by Sripad B. G. Narasingha Maharaja, the translation of this verse of the Bhagavatam (10.33.39) given above appears to have been taken from Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s Sri Caitanya Caritamrta, Antya-lila 5.48.
This is an elaborate subject matter more fully discussed in Madhurya-kadambini (Cloud Bank of Nectar), Third Shower of Nectar: Mitigation of Inauspicious Elements, Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, translated by Deena Bandhu Dasa with the help of his friends, Vrinda Trust, Nandagram, U.P., 1993
To better understand this, just think of prema as the ultimate development of sraddha, the beginning point in the process of devotional service outlined by Srila Rupa Gosvami. See Endnote 1. Sraddha is present in all the stages — it doesn’t cease when sadhu-sanga, et al, begin. Similarly, in prema, anartha-nivrtti becomes absolute; that is to say, anarthas are absolutely eradicated. Which is also interesting to note in connection with the fall of the jiva issue.
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Any missing transliterations will be supplied upon request.
Sri Guru-carana-padma, Srila Narottama dasa Thakura
Conversation, Vrndavana, India, September 11th, 1974, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Chapter 33: "Description of the Rasa Dance", Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 7.1.30, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 5.5.9, Lecture, Vrndavana, India, October 31st, 1976, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Sri Caitanya-Caritamrta, Madhya-lila 8.255, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Radhastami, Srimati Radharani’s Appearance Day Lecture, London, England, September 18th, 1968, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Letter, to disciple Hayagriva das, Los Angeles, California, USA, November 8th, 1968, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Lecture, Mayapura, West Bengal, India, March 29th, 1975, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Krsna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Chapter 33: "Description of the Rasa Dance", Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 4.12.44, Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Letter, to disciple Rupanuga das, Tirupati, India, April 28th, 1974, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Analogously, in the United States legal system, the dicta, personal notes on a ruling (private letters, informal conversations) of a judge (guru), while informing of his temperament (speciality), do not carry the weight of the actual ruling (guru’s commentary), which must also stand up to the test of appeals to the higher courts of his peers and superiors (sadhus’s commentaries) and the Constitution (sastra). While I myself have quoted in this paper from such letters and taped conversations (which are indeed quite revealing in certain circumstances—for example, the origin and meaning of the words "International Society for Krishna Consciousness" discussed in Endnote 51 to follow—and sometimes helpful for resolving practical issues), it might generally serve the entire Vaisnava community better if in the future, when engaging in debates (both face-to-face and long distance), all the sincere proponents of various camps stick to tattva and siddhanta as provided in actual written commentaries and sastra to back up their positions.
Lecture delivered by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur Prabhupada at Radha-kunda during Vraja-mandal parikrama in 1932, which was printed in The Gaudiya in 1934
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.26-27, Text, Disciples of Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.33.26-27, Purport, Disciples of Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
Bhakti-rasamrta-sindu-bindu, Eastern Division, Second Wave, Sadhana-bhakti, Chapter 3, "Stages Leading to Appearance of Prema", page 32, Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja, GVP
Brhan Naradiya Purana 4.33; Hari Bhakti Vilas 10.279
Sri Siksastaka, Sloka One, Page 4, Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja, GVP
Prema-vivarta, Sri Jagadananda Pandita, Chapter 7, Texts 1 - 3
The Hare Krsna Mantra, Record, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.13.10, Lecture, Geneva, Switzerland, June 1st, 1974, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Sri Caitanya-Caritamrta, Madhya-lila 8.70, Text, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT. Purport: "The previous two verses are included in the Padyavali (13, 14), an anthology compiled by Srila Rupa Gosvami. Verse 69 refers to devotional service in faith, and verse 70 refers to devotional service rendered out of intense greed. The first is devotional service rendered in accordance with the regulative principles (vaidhi-bhakti), and the second refers to spontaneous loving service (raganuga-bhakti) of the Lord without extraneous endeavor…."
Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.2.12, Lecture, Los Angeles, California, USA, August 15th, 1972, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Darsana, Mayapura, West Bengal, India, February 26th, 1977, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
A Second Chance: The Story of a Near-Death Experience, Chapter 16: "Lord Krsna’s Transcendental Pastimes", Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
The Nectar of Instruction, Verse 8 & Purport, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, BBT
The first publishing contained the Sanskrit transliteration.
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
Venu-gita, Introduction, Srila B. V. Narayana Gosvami Maharaja, GVP
As a parent, I can only attribute whatever attraction my teenage son has to chanting now to his having grown up hearing Krsna book stories (hari-katha) and then receiving the mercy of advanced Vaisnavas and a bona-fide rasika-guru to further solidify his faith and childhood understandings.

*The author resigned from Bhakti Trust International on November 22, 2005. This article was submitted earlier when he was an active participant.

Contemporary Disciples Page

Hearing from A Rasika Acarya?

by James Mc Donough Jr. [Formerly Tridandisvami Bhaktivedanta Bhakti Sar, Dhrystadyumna das*]

by James Mc Donough Jr.
[Formerly Tridandisvami Bhaktivedanta Bhakti Sar, Dhrystadyumna das*]