IN THE STREETS OF NABADWIP
Sree Gaursundar
as Professor chose the afternoons for visiting the citizens of Nabadwip in the
company of His pupils. He graciously accosted all the people; and everyone
entertained feelings of the deepest regard for the Lord. This respectful
attitude towards Him, which was universal, was a matter of instinct, as at this
period no one was aware of the Divinity of the Lord. The Lord frequented all
the streets of the city affording the people an opportunity of beholding Him
Who is inaccessible even to the gods.
The Lord
now behaved with the same absence of reserve on these visits to the citizens as
we noticed on the occasion of His nervous malady. In this case also no one was
able to recognize Him although He stood fully manifest to all seeming. Thakur
Brindavandas has handed down the following particulars of these activities.
On one of
these occasions Sree Gaursundar presented Himself at the door of a weaver’s
home. The weaver at once made obeisance to Him with the greatest respect. The
Lord asked Him to bring out his best cloth, which the weaver did at once. The
Lord asked what price he expected for his cloth. The weaver replied that he
would accept whatever was offered. After the bargain had been settled the Lord
said He had no money with Him. The weaver replied that it was not necessary for
Him to pay immediately. He might take the cloth, wear it and pay in ten days or
a fortnight or by installments, according to His convenience. The Lord bestowed
His auspicious Glance on that weaver as He left the place.
The Lord
then entered the quarter of the town which was occupied by the milkmen. He took
His Seat at the door-way of the home of one of the cowherds. The Lord, by the
privilege of a Brahmana commanded him jocosely in an imperious tone to bring
out his milk and curds, saying that He would favour him that day by accepting
the best of the gifts that his household could provide. The cowherds beheld it
was the God of love Himself Who thus asked for their gift. With great respect
they offered their best seat to Him. The Lord continued to talk in a jocose
vein to the cowherds. They addressed Him as their ‘maternal uncle’. Some asked
Him to eat their cooked food in their Company. A certain milkman took Him to
his home on his shoulders. A few remarked that He had once eaten all the cooked
food that was in their houses and He might probably recollect it. Saraswati, the Goddess of speech, spoke
truly, but the milkmen themselves did not know. The Lord laughed at these words
of the cowherds. All the milkmen now brought out their milk, ghee, curds, sar and excellent butter and gladly gave
to the Lord. The Lord expressed His satisfaction at such friendly conduct of
the cowherds.
He then
went forward and entered the home of a dealer in perfumes (gandha-vanika). The trader made his bow at the Feet of the Lord
with great respect. The Lord asked him to bring out his best perfumes. As he
did so the Lord inquired their price. The trader replied that the price must be
already known to Him and that it would be hardly proper to demand any price
from Him. That trader then begged to be allowed to apply the perfumes to His
Body and to return home for that day. If enough of fragrance persisted till
next day and did not cease after bath, then He might pay any price that He liked.
With these words the trader, with his own hand, put his perfumes all over the
Holy Form of the Lord in a rapture of joy that was perfectly unaccountable.
‘The Supreme Lord’, observes Thakur Brindavandas, ‘abiding in the heart of all
beings, ever attracts their minds unto Himself. Who is not bewitched by the
Sight of His Beauty?’
The Lord next
made His way to the home of a garland-maker. The garland-maker was smitten with
the extraordinary Beauty of the Lord and did obeisance to Him after offering a
seat with great respect. The Lord asked Him to give good garlands and told him
that He had no money with Him. The garland-maker noticing that He had the
appearance of one who had actually realized Godhead said that He might not pay.
With these words the garland-maker placed his garlands on the Divine Form of
the Lord. This made Sree Gaursundar and all His pupils laugh. The Lord
bestowing His auspicious Glance on that garland-maker, made his way to the home
of a betel-seller.
The
betel-seller was taken by surprise on seeing the Lord Himself crossing the
threshold of His humble abode. In his delight the betel-seller, of his own
accord, offered Him his betels which made the Lord laugh. The Lord asked why he
was offering the betel made up with betel-nut without demanding any price. The
betel-seller made reply that it was due to a spontaneous impulse of his mind.
The Lord began to chew the prepared betel that had been offered. The
betel-seller then presented the Lord with betel-leaf, camphor and other spices
of excellent quality used in making up the betel, desiring Him with great
reverence, to accept it and would not take any price. Sree Gaursundar favoured
that betel-seller in this fashion.
The Lord
visited the residence of a dealer in conches who made Him, obeisance with great
reverence on beholding Him. The Lord asked for good conches declaring that as
He had no money with Him He did not know how He could buy them. The conch
dealer, at once gave the Lord his best conches with the remark that He might
pay at His leisure and consider Himself under no obligation to pay The Lord was
very much pleased by hearing these words of the conch-dealer and bestowed on
him the favour of His auspicious Glance.
In this
manner the Lord visited regularly the houses of all the towns-people of
Nabadwip.
The Lord
next made His way to the house of a diviner who could predict everything. The
Lord told him that as he was reputed to be a very competent person He had come
to him to inquire about information regarding Himself as to what He was in His
former births. ‘Right’ said the diviner. But on applying himself as a
preliminary to repeating mentally the mantram
of Gopala that diviner of excellent deeds at once beheld the Divine Form
with the bluish hue, Four-Armed, holding the Conch, Disc, Club and Lotus, His
Breast adorned with the jewel Kaustuva and the sign of Srivatsa. He saw the
Lord in the prison-chamber at the dead of night with His parents in front of
Him in the act of adoration. Presently he had a vision that the father, taking up
his new-born Boy in his arms, put Him away that very night in the cowherd
settlement. He saw again the Nude, Beautiful, two-Armed Child, with the belt of
jingling bells on His Waist, tasting the butter with both Hands. The diviner in
fact saw all those Signs that belong to his own cherished Divinity on Whom he
mediated at all time He beheld once again the divine form, with the Flute
touching His Lips, in the triple-bent attitude, surrounded by the milk-maids,
discoursing instrumental and vocal music. On beholding this extraordinary
vision the diviner opened his eyes in wonder and fixing his gaze on Gauranga
went on repeating his recitals. He then supplicated the Deity of his cherished
worship in these words, ‘Listen, O Gopala, divine Boy! Do Thou show me quickly
who this Brahmana was in His former Births.’
Thereupon,
the diviner had a vision of the Lord, Bow in Hand, of grass-green Hue, seated
in the Attitude of the warrior. He saw Him again in the midst of the Cataclysm
of complete destruction in the form of the wonderful Boar Whose Tusk was
holding aloft this world. He saw Him once more Appearing as the Man-lion, of
most fierce Aspect, infinitely Tender to His devotee. He saw Him again in the
Act of deluding the sacrificing King Bali, in the Form of the Dwarf. Then He
beheld Him in the form of the Fish in the waters of the Deluge, playing merrily
in the Flood. That diviner of excellent deeds saw the Lord once again in the
Form of the maddened Holder of the Plough, with the Club in His Hand. The
diviner saw the shining Form of Jagannath with Subhadra in the middle and Balarama
on His right. The diviner had a vision in is manner of the true Nature of the
Lord, but yet he understood nothing. ‘Such’, says Thakur Brindavandas, ‘is the
force of the deluding power of the Lord.’
The
diviner was very much astonished and thought within himself that the Brahmana
must be a great sorcerer or He might be some god who had perchance appeared to
him in a frolic in the guise of a Brahmana in order to delude him. He also duly
noticed the indications of the super-human fiery glow irradiating the body of
the Brahmana and was perplexed thinking that he was being befooled for
pretending to know everything. While the diviner was busy with these thoughts
the Lord said laughing: ‘Who am I? What do you see? tell me everything without
reserve.” The diviner said, “Be pleased to leave me alone for the present. Let
me repeat my mantram with a clear
mind. I shall tell You in the afternoon.’ ‘Very gook,” said the Lord as He went
off on His way laughing.
The Lord
now presented Himself at the home of His beloved Sridhar. The Lord often
visited Sridhar at his house on various excuses and never left him without
exchanging jokes with him for a short time. On seeing the Lord Sridhar at once
approached Him with great respect and made Him take a seat. Sridhar was
naturally of a most gentle disposition. The Lord’s behaviour was that of a most
restless and arrogant person. thereupon the following dialogue ensued between
Sree Gaursundar and Sridhar.
The Lord
asked, ‘Sridhar, you take the Name of Hari constantly. Why do you yet suffer
such great privations? Tell Me how it is that you suffer from want of food and
clothing by serving the Lord of the Goddess of wealth?’ Sridhar replied, ‘but I
do not actually starve and I also put on clothing of some sort, be it long or
short’. the Lord went on, ‘I notice your cloth is patched at a dozen places and
there is no straw to the thatch of your hut. Is there the person in the town
who is stinted for food and clothing by worshipping Chandi and Bishahari?’ Sridhar said, ‘Bipra, Thou
hast said well. But yet the time of all persons passes all the same. The king
lives in a palace of gems and eats and dresses most sumptuously; the birds
inhabit the tree-top. Nevertheless the time of both passes away all the same.
They enjoy the fruits of their respectively acts awarded by the Will of
Isvara.’
The Lord
said, ‘You have immense wealth. You dine on it most sumptuously in secret. when
will that day be when I shall make your secret known to everybody? then shall I
see how you can deceive the people so!’ said Sridhar, ‘Pandit’ it is better for
you to return home. It is not meet for us to quarrel with each other., The Lord
said, ‘I am not going to let you off in this fashion. Tell me at once what you
are going to give Me., Sridhar replied, ‘I live by selling the bark of the
plantain tree. You better say what at all I can give your Reverence.’ The Lord
said, ‘I am not just now going to take the buried treasures that you possess. I
shall have it later. For the present give me gratis plantain, radishes and the soft core of the plantain tree. I
shall not trouble you if you do so.’ Sridhar thought within himself, ‘The Brahmana
is so very arrogant. He is certainly: going to thrash me one of these days. And
even if He hurts me what can I do to a Brahmana? Neither can I afford to give
Him daily without being paid. Still what a Brahmana takes even by force or
guile is surely my good fortune, and I shall, therefore, give Him everyday.,
After meditating in this manner Sridhar said, ‘Listen, Your Reverence You need
not pay anything. I shall willingly give you core, plantain. radishes and bark.
So be pleased not to quarrel with me any more., The Lord said, ‘This is well
and good. There will be no more quarrel from now if only you always give Me good core, plantain and radishes.’
The Lord
dined everyday off the plantain-bark of Sridhar. The core, plantain and
radishes of Sridhar were the most relished dishes at His Daily Meal. The Lord
ate the gourd, that grew on the plant trained on Sridhar’s thatch, cooked in
milk and pepper. The Lord now asked, ‘Sridhar, what do you think I am? I shall
go home as soon as you tell Me only this.’ Sridhar said, ‘You are a Brahmana, a
part and parcel of Vishnu Himself., The Lord replied, ‘You do not know. I come
of a family of milkmen. But you see Me as the Son of a Brahmana. I, however,
know Myself to be a milk-man.’ Sridhar laughed on hearing the Words of the Lord
and did not recognize his own cherished Deity by the force of His Deluding
Power. Said the Lord, ‘Sridhar, I will tell you the Truth. All the greatness of
your Ganges is due to Myself.’ Sridhar protested, ‘Well, Nimai Pandit, art Thou
not afraid even of the Ganges? Man grows sober with advancing years. But Your
restlessness is increasing with double speed’. After indulging in such merry
repertoire with Sridhar Lord Gauranga-Hari returned to His own Home.
The above
episodes may seem to represent the Lord in the character of a begging Brahmana
who is out among the hard-worked artisans and poor people to squeeze from them
the best that their poverty can yield. there are two subjects in this picture, viz., the conduct of the Lord and of the
humble folk, both of which deserve our careful consideration.
Sree
Gaursundar did not accept the gifts of the poor for any charitable purpose but
frankly for His Own Personal Use. He does not appear to have rendered them any
service in return; those people did not expect nor wish for any return. Neither
did they apparently give their things with the idea that they were giving them
to a needy beggar. they gave from a feeling of reverence and not on account of
His individual qualities of which they had not always a very decidedly
all-round favourable opinion. even Sridhar admitted to himself that the Brahmana was unduly arrogant. the soothsayer,
who to many persons would seem to have been the most favoured of all, took Him
to be a Person versed in the Black Art Who was trying to befool him. so all
these people gave away their best
things to this arrogant brahmana in conformity with a customary practice and
not for the reason that Sree Gaursundar possessed any outstanding merit or
worth of His Own. Sridhar even complains that the Brahmana was not above using
both force as well as dissimulation to obtain the lion’s share of his scanty
wares. Sree Gaursundar may, thus appear to be evidently exploiting the
credulity of ordinary superstitious, ignorant, masses for His own personal
profit and thereby countenancing the objectionable practices of those
degenerate Brahmanas who go about begging for their livelihood.
why did
those poor people give Him their best things? Let Sridhar speak for the rest.
Sridhar said he did not covet the wealth of kings. He thought that the time of
himself was passing in exactly the same way as that of kings and he did not
hold Godhead responsible for making any inequitable difference between a king
and himself as in his opinion there was really no difference. But neither was
Sridhar a cynic. He was aware that the things of this world were capable of
being rightly used in the service of Vishnu; and that no depth of poverty was
an excuse for the neglect of this paramount duty. giving to the Brahmana was in
his opinion, identical with giving to Vishnu ‘because Vishnu was represented in
this world by the Brahmana for accepting such service through His devotees.
True, the Brahmana in question, viz.,
Sree Gaursundar, appeared to him to be very arrogant and dissembling. But he
himself was also not prepared to give willingly anything to the Brahmana on the
worthless plea of his utter poverty; and, therefore, the only alternative was
to suffer his things to be taken by force or fraud by the Brahmana who did him
the favour of accepting his things in this boisterous fashion’. This is the
inside of the heart of Sridhar. This was the faith of all those humble people.
But can
we really serve Godhead by offering Him the things of this world . Sree
Gaursundar says we can. If we regard Godhead and the objects offered to Godhead
as categories of this world the process is objectionable involving the
degradation of worship. Godhead is not a receiver of any earthly objects. But
we have also nothing to offer Him except these very earthly objects, because we
ourselves are of this Earth at present. Sree Gaursundar says that we are not
earthly; but if we attain our natural, super-mundane, state we are in a
position to realize that the objects of this Earth have also a spiritual
relationship to ourselves. This spiritual side of the things of this world does
not manifest itself to us as long as we continue to regard them as being meant
for gratifying our hankering for worldly enjoyment. Such attitude is the sign
as well as cause of our real ignorance of our true self.
There is
such a thing as the soul, apart from limited and temporary entities of all
gross and subtle types. This soul is our proper self. The vision of our souls
is for the present clouded by the exclusive contemplation of alien objects
which we are apt to consider as having affinity with ourselves. The soul in the
sinful state values only such use of things as can afford him pleasure in some
form or other. He constantly strives to multiply the opportunity and scope of
such enjoyment. This vision is, however, the clouded vision. It was not
Sridhar’s vision. Sridhar realized that the enjoyment of the things of this
world could not really satisfy his soul. The things of this world are meant not
to be enjoyed but to be used in some other way. They are to be offered unconditionally
to One for Whose Sole enjoyment they
are meant. And Who is that One Person ? He cannot be any sinful creature. He is
no mortal, but Godhead Himself. The Brahmana is part and parcel of Vishnu.
Vishnu also appears in this gross world for enjoying the things of this world.
Sridhar believed that He does so for the benefit of sinners, that Vishnu
appears in the form of Brahmanas who are free from all sin. A Brahmana knows
the proper use of the things of this world. He does not seek his own enjoyment
but serves Godhead therewith. It is because he possesses this knowledge that he
is a Brahmana. If anything is given willingly or unwillingly to a Brahmana it
is offered to Godhead and is sure to reach Him through the Brahmana. The things
of this world in this relationship to Sree Gaursundar also appeared to Sridhar
in this light. This was so because Sridhar’s soul was in his natural state who
could realize that he has no affinity with the things of this world as a means
of his worldly enjoyment.
Sridhar’s
philosophy might seem to make no provision for the material prosperity of the
world. It may also seem to be akin to blind faith. The last objection has been
answered in the preceding paragraph. The so-called clear-sightedness of the
conditioned souls is their real blindness. Our faith in the value of the things
of this world as objects of our enjoyment, is the real blind faith. Sridhar’s
faith is not blinded by this essentially- irrational partiality in favour of
worldliness the utter-worthlessness of which must be patent to all as a fact of
even one’s daily and hourly experience. Sridhar’s philosophy does not, indeed,
trouble about the progress of this world which it attributes to the Direct
Action of Godhead awarding the material fruits of the sinful endeavours of
conditioned souls who alone happen to be the denizens of this mundane world. He
regards so-called worldly prosperity more as a snare than a help. But he is
careful not to ignore, for this reason, the very existence of this world. The
world is not an illusion.
So long
as we are placed in this world we cannot but have to do with things mundane.
Our duty, while we are so placed, must however, be to use all kinds of material
facility for the service of Vishnu Who has no wants of His Own but Who
condescends to
condescends
to receive our offerings in order to enable us to live, also under these
adverse circumstances, a life of service. The service of Vishnu is the only
true and eternal religion. It’s truth can be recognized by our clouded understanding
during those lucid intervals when we are impelled by the experience of
worldliness to be impartial seekers of a really wholesome function. There are
sinless people who are not subject to the domination of the enjoyable side of
phenomena to whom all things of this world disclose their spiritual forms who
teach us to serve Vishnu with their help. The condition that is ensured by such
service is the only true progress and one that, instead of augmenting our
blindness, serves to clear up our blinded vision.
But we
may still be disposed to ask certain questions, ‘Will the offering of our best
things to unworthy and beggarly Brahmanas, who claim them as a matter of right
for the purpose of gratifying their worldly appetites, also conduce to such a
result?’ It is not necessary to discriminate between a real Brahmana and a real
non-Brahmana? And who, indeed, is a real Brahmana? Did Sridhar or the other
poor people really know that Sree Gaursundar was Vishnu Himself? Evidently they
did not bother. Is such blind devotion to caste Brahmanas recommended as a
reliable and wholesome principle by the above episodes? Neither did Sridhar nor
any of the other townsmen, who were so liberal to Sree Gaursundar, entertain
any suspicions regarding the worth of Sree Gaursundar as recipient of their
gifts. They did not venture to gauge the worth of a Brahmana by the measure of
their clouded understanding. In this view their conduct was not the denial but
the perfection, of the truly rational attitude. They waited to be enlightened,
without muddling. This excellence of judgment was the natural concomitant of
their own unworldly life which is an indispensable preparatory for the
spiritual. They will thereby soon learn about the real Truth and be saved from
the degrading effects of indiscriminate, worldly charity to beggars for a
worldly purpose. It is the only duty of all true Brahmanas to enlighten
everyone who really wants to be enlightened. Unworldly conduct in every
relationship of life is the only proof of the possession of such desire. This
mode of imparting enlightenment is the eternal Dispensation of Providence and
it never fails to operate with unerring beneficence in all cases. Those who are
charitable to Brahmanas from any worldly motive never have the sight of a real
Brahmana who possesses the knowledge of Godhead.
But it
may be argued that Sree Gaursundar was encouraging the trade of a betel-maker
by accepting his service. Is not the trade of a betel-seller altogether
harmful? Will such encouragement not be misunderstood as approval of a practice
which is condemned by the Srimad Bhagavatam
Srimad Bhagavatam warns us
against sensuous enjoyment of the objects of this world and proceeds to
enumerate categorically certain forms of sensuous enjoyment that are to be avoided
by all means. It says no doubt that no rules are applicable to those who really
serve Krishna. Srimad Bhagavatam does
not mean that the bona fide servants
of Krishna are privileged to indulge in sensuous conduct. What it means is that
Krishna is served by the senses of those who are perfectly unmindful of their
own enjoyment. We are not required to give up anything we are required to learn
the only proper method of using everything. Till we understand this true method
we should agree to be taught, by desisting from the wrong method which would
otherwise prevent us from knowing truly by the only effective method, viz. , that of actual personal
experience.
Sree
Gaursundar did not declare a crusade against the externality of conduct of any
kind. All activities are a part and parcel of the eternal scheme of the
universe and can and need never be abolished. Sree Gaursundar desired that we
should acquire the right vision which enables us to employ all things of this
world in the service of Krishna, without interfering with the external
appearance which is the eternal perverted concomitant reflection of the real
shutting from us the true view of the Reality. But the perverted reflection can
no more be abolished than the reality. Both exist for ever in their respective
reciprocal relationship. It is not they but our attitude to them that requires
to be adjusted. Gaursundar declares that the smarta view, i.e., the ordinary view of so-called orthodox Hindus,
which regards a thing of this world as pure or impure by its worldly reference,
is opposed to the teaching of the spiritual Scriptures. Nothing can be impure
except the attitude of the observer. To the pure vision everything is
necessarily pure. According to the Bhagavatam
the paramahansas are above all
those rules that are meant for the guidance of conditioned souls. This leniency
to them means neither undue partiality nor indiscriminate license. The
Scriptures provide for the strictest guidance of all dissociable souls by the
eternally free sadhus who alone can
understand the real spirit of those regulations and can, therefore, apply them
in the proper way. This is so because they themselves always spontaneously
follow the spirit that is negatively represented by those regulations. The real
devotees are privileged to know that for no one there is any such thing as
impurity in the sphere of spiritual service. Those who, being themselves averse
to Godhead, set up as teachers of the Bhagavatam,
delude themselves as well as their pupils by their false teachings.
The
eternally free state is not a figment of the atheist’s imagination. It is, on
the contrary, the most decisive proof of one’s utter ignorance of the state of
the devotee to suppose that the true nature of such state can be realized by the
imagination of one who does not serve God. It is tantamount to confounding the
shadow with the substance, darkness with light; because such knowledge is real
ignorance and such imaginary purity is the most insidious form of aversion to
Godhead. Such deluded people bring upon themselves the richly deserved
punishment that is due to their hopeless pursuit of the shadow under the
willfully mistaken plea that it is the substance. The identification of the
unreal with the real, of the wrong idea with the object, is the consciously
perpetrated great error of all empiric speculations regarding the Reality. It
is equivalent to conscious or unconscious denial of all reality on the
dishonest plea that the Reality is incomprehensible to our present limited
understanding. On this misapplied plea are we justified in deliberately
choosing to be content with an imaginary ‘moral, order and call it also ‘real,
on the testimony of a gratuitously assumed universal
instinct of the race? In other words are we to recognize the failure of our
pervert reason to know the Reality by stifling the faculty of reason itself?
Sree Gaursundar warns us against such useless act of suicide and declares that
the Reality really exists and can also be really known to us despite the
self-created insufficiency of our present understanding; and that it is,
therefore, our first and only duty to try to realise the Truth by adopting a
life which is really free from all taint of duplicity. That this is also the
only truly rational course and one whose success is a foregone conclusion.
On His
return home after accosting Sridhar in the manner described above, Sree
Gaursundar seated Himself at the door of the room that was consecrated to the
worship of Vishnu The students, who had been in attendance, departed to their
respective homes. As He caught sight of the rising full moon the Lord’s heart
was filled with loving recollections of the Moon of Brindavana. He thereupon
began to discourse strains of the Flute, Whose sweetness was never experienced
in this world. But no one could catch it except the mother.
On
hearing the note of the Flute that bewitches the triple universe, the mother
fainted on the spot by complete immersion in the ocean of bliss. Presently
recovering her external consciousness, having compassed her mind, she listened
to the unprecedented melody of the Divine Flute. She perceived the sound to
proceed from the direction where Gaurangasundar was seated Having this
wonderful aural experience the mother came out of the room and found her Son still
sitting at Vishnu’s doorstep. She could no longer hear the strains of the Flute
but beheld the Disc of the Moon in the Bosom of her Son. She saw distinctly the
Sphere of the Moon inside the Breast of her Son and looked about her in
amazement.
Returning
to her room the mother began to think about the reason, but could not arrive at
any solution. Such was the high fortune of mother Sachi who constantly beheld
such never-ending Divine Manifestations. One day during the night mother Sachi
heard hundreds of people singing and playing on musical instruments. She heard
various musical sounds made by the mouth, the sound as of a dance, the tread of
feet as if a vast Rasa Pastime was in
progress. One day she found that all the house, the rooms, doors and windows,
were made exclusively of light. Another day she had a sight of celestial
nymphs, beautiful as Lakshmi Herself, their hands adorned with the shining
lotus flower One day she had a vision of shining gods and, after just catching
sight of them, could not see them again. All these visions are nothing at all
impossible in the case of the Mother Whom the Veda declares to be the very Form of Devotion to Vishnu. Even
those, on whom the Mother casts Her auspicious glance but once, are thereby
endowed with the eligibility of beholding those manifestations. Thus did Sree
Gaursundar, Wearer of the Garland of Wild Flowers, abide in His Own Eternal
Joy, in concealment; such being His Pleasure. although the Lord was manifesting
Himself in all these various ways yet He could not be recognized even by any of
His Own servants.
The
Mothers of Sree Krishna serve the Lord as embodiments of the principle of pure
reverential devotion like that of Devaki and Prisni, or by unmixed maternal
affection like Yasoda and Sachi. The Mothers are not denied the transcendental
un-alloyed service of Krishna although they are His superiors by relationship
and are regarded as such by Krishna. It is the special privilege of the
servants of Krishna to behold the manifestations of His Divine Power and
Majesty. Sree Sachi Devi serves the Lord with greater devotion than His other
servants. She loves Sree Gaursundar as her Son standing in constant need of her
protecting affection. This is different from the purely reverential attitude of
service. In this world parental affection precludes all element of the
principle of service as practiced by an inferior. Even when the mother nurses
her own child she cannot be supposed, without a jarring violation of all sense
of propriety and truth, to be guided by a feeling of reverence for her own
offspring. The two sentiments, as they are conceived in this world, are
different and incompatible. In the Mothers of Krishna maternal affection
perfects and incorporates, instead of excluding, the element of loyal servitude.
There is no loss of any principle but only the growing excellence, by
additional elements, of the one indivisible basic function which, inconceivably
to us, gathers up all minute and nice distinctions that are found pervertedly
reflected in the exclusive grades of mundane relationships
The most
noticeable Feature of the Activities of Sree Gaursundar at this period, is
Arrogance. He chose to carry the Pastime of His Arrogance to such lengths that
there was at that time in the whole of Nabadwip no person who could beat Him in
this respect. Commenting on this Thakur Brindavandas is led to observe that it
is the peculiar and inalienable Characteristic of Krishna that He has no equal
in whatever role He chooses to play and Sree Brindavandas Thakur proceeds to
recapitulate the most notable instances of His Excesses. When the Lord chooses
to indulge in the Pastime of fighting He excels all in the most perfect use of
the weapons of warfare. When He wishes to indulge in amorous sports He effects
the conquest of myriads of His sweethearts. When He desires to enjoy the
pleasures of riches the homes of His servants are filled with the most profuse
abundance of all precious jewels. When, at a subsequent period, this very
Arrogant Gaursundar renounced the world and turned a Sannyasin, a particle of His Renunciation was vainly to be looked
for in all this triple universe. The truth of this Fact, says Thakur Brindavandas,
writing of Events that were still fresh in the minds of all the people, is
patent to all. The Renunciation of Sree Gaursundar is never possible in any
other person.
Those who
represent Sree Gaursundar as engaged in amorous pastimes with His mistresses in
the manner of His Activities of Dvapara
Leela, commit an unpardonable offense against the canons of historical as
well as spiritual propriety. It is directly opposed to the testimony of Sree
Brindavandas Thakur who says clearly that at this period when Sree Gaursundar
was exhibiting the Leela of a house-holder at Nabadwip He was, indeed, a most
restless and mischievous Person Who was full of arrogance, but with one most
significant reservation, viz., He
altogether abstained then and throughout His Career from the society or
discourse of women for indulgence in amorous pastimes as Enjoyer. He exhibited
all along the role of the ideal servant of Krishna who is exclusively devoted
to his Lord and absolutely free from any hankering for enjoyment on His Own
Account.
Certain
sections of Sree Chaitanya’s professed followers, actuated by their worldly propensity,
do not hesitate even from casting the aspersion of adulterous conduct on the
perfectly abstemious Character of Sree Gaursundar. This willful and gross
misrepresentation of a historical fact only shows the depths of the utter
degradation to which the human nature is liable to fall by its efforts to
comprehend the Doings of the Divinity under the dictates of its irrepressible
hankering for sensuous enjoyment. It is for this reason that the contemplation
of the conduct of the devotees of Krishna has been extolled by the Scriptures
as being of greater help to souls striving for spiritual amelioration than even
the Doings of the Lord Himself; because the Latter are liable to be wholly
misunderstood by those who do not properly realize the supreme necessity of
being instructed therein by the transcendental preceptor who leads the
perfectly unworldly life and who is thereby enabled to have the right
understanding of the Divine Activities of Sree Krishna Who is altogether
unintelligible even to the candid worldly mind that pretends to seek for the
real Truth. By such willful distortion of the Leela of Sree Gaursundar these insincere and thoughtless people
only prevent themselves and others who are minded like themselves from realizing
the true nature of the genuine devotee whom it was the object of Sree
Gaursundar to make known to us by His Own Divine Conduct and Teaching. Unless
and until we learn to follow the Teaching of Sree Gaursundar we can never
realize the true Nature of the Activities of the Lord in His Avatara. in the
different Ages by reference to their Source.
For the
same reason a conditioned soul must never try to ape the transcendental conduct
of the servants of Krishna; because the activities of the unalloyed devotees
cannot be understood except by their mercy, that is to say except by
unconditional submission with body, mind and speech to the servant of the
Absolute. It is not enough to have listened to the words of the devotee without
submitting to be fully guided in our every act. On the transcendental plane
there is no difference between idea and word and object denoted by them. This
has to be realized not by persisting to differentiate between them while
undergoing discipleship under a sadhu, but
by submitting to realize them as an indivisible whole in our practice as well.
So long as we actually retain an idea of our present disloyal conviction that
they are separate from one another and that the Absolute Truth can be realized
by merely exercising our intellect in the same way in which we find out the
so-called truths of our worldly experience, we are doomed to deceive both
ourselves and others by willfully and profanely confounding, against the
imperative dictates of our own unalloyed reason, the material with the
spiritual. Or, one may fall into deception of the opposite kind and ape the
external conduct of a sadhu without caring to listen, with sufficient attention
and with a serving disposition, to his words regarding Krishna. This will make
one’s conduct a mechanical performance and also prevent the due realization of
the momentous fact that on the plane of the Absolute there is no such thing as
unintelligibility, i.e., absence of the fullest cognition. Every act of the
servant of Krishna is instinct with all real cognitive significance, not in the
imagined, figurative, or transferred but undivided absolute sense. The words of
the sadhu have to be lived if one is sincerely willing to
realize their true significance. Hence there arises the necessity of complete
submission to the bona fide spiritual
guide at all stages of spiritual endeavour.
The
Doings of Krishna are not cognisable even to His Own servants unless He is
pleased to let them know The activities of Sree Gaursundar, although He
exhibits the Leela of the devotee,
are not intelligible to any person except by means of His special Grace
vouchsafed through His servants. The Arrogance of Nimai Pandit deceived
everybody in regard to His Real Nature. He appeared even to the Vaishnavas as
an atheistical pedant whose only ambition was to acquire the reputation of the
greatest scholar of His time. They confounded Him with those really egotistic
pedants who abounded in Nabadwip and who were the worst enemies of the true
religion inasmuch as in their role of teachers of the Religion they supported
their impieties by the authority of the Holy Scriptures. They are the Putanas who abound in a controversial
Age and it was necessary to stop their mouths if the Religion as not to be
stifled at its birth. It is the Nature of Krishna to deal with everybody at his
own weapons. He is the Servant of His servants and the Terror of His enemies.
The Ideal
Devotee of Krishna, Sree Gaursundar possessed by right of His Devotion all
these Qualities of Krishna Himself. He was dealing with the atheistical
teachers of religion on their own plane where alone, indeed, they could be met,
although they did not deserve such aggressive mercy. But the Lord Himself must
not, therefore, be supposed as belonging to their plane. By this conduct Sree
Gaursundar was trying to help them in the only way that would be intelligible
to them, viz., by proving the
insufficiency of their polemics and thereby making it clear that they could not
understand the real meaning of the Scriptures.
The Pride
and Arrogance of the Lord humbled even those proud and arrogant atheists who
had grown hoary, in the practice of sophistry and were too bad to be reformed
in any less violent way. This is the case of all empiricists, more or less, of
this day or that. They really understand nothing, but always act as they know
everything. They only submit to the sophist who is a greater juggler than
themselves. Such polemical defeat serves to confirm them more strongly in the
wisdom of their suicidal course. But if the art of the juggler is used not to
confirm but rescue the juggler from his favourite self-deception such remedial
jugglery is thereby raised to the level of the service of Krishna Who wishes to
rescue all perverse souls by their own co-operating free choice. Sree
Gaursundar set the example of such service in His Leela as ideal House-holder and Teacher. It is the duty of all
scholars and teachers, if they want to be saved from self-deception and to
prevent others from being deceived by their pedantic untruths, to accept
unreservedly the service of the Absolute Truth as the only goal of their
endeavours, and, when they find Him, to assert Him against all who parade such
untruths as the medicine authorized by the scriptures of all the ills of our
mortal estate. If this ideal of teachership were adopted it would really cure
all distempers that the flesh is heir to, which can be healed by no other
method.
The
distinctive feature of the Teaching of Sree Gaursundar is Causeless and
Unbounded Mercy to all souls. The very Fullness of His Mercy stands in the way
of the realization of its nature and specially by those pedantic worldlings who
are proud of their own mis-supposed worth and are thereby led to prescribe
their nostrums for the undoing of their unfortunate admirers. Those who
mechanically follow the dictums of Vaishnavism
or Revealed Religion, i.e., all Pharisees also necessarily fail to
understand the supreme Mercy of Sree Gaursundar. Sree Gaursundar sets no value
on conduct that is not inspired by unalloyed love for the Absolute. He teaches
the function that breaks through all rules and conventions for the purpose of
acting up to the Fountainhead of all rules and conventions. He sets His Face
against all forms of self-complacency that is unduly vain of its laurels. The
pure soul knows no inferior and has no taste for pedantic sophistry for
procuring any worldly laurels. He strives under all circumstances, to realize
the unconditional service of the Absolute. He has no selfish inclination and no
suspicion that anything may not benefit himself. He knows spontaneously by his
open-hearted experience of the Reality that to serve the Absolute in all manner
and under all circumstances, is the only proper function. The service of the
Absolute is capable of being realized and equally liable to be missed, under
every form. Those who fix their attention on the external form, can never
understand the behaviour of the real servants of the Absolute. No Pharisee can
understand why Godhead sends the pouring showers of His Mercy on the just and
the unjust. In this case the Nature of the Source from Whom the conduct
proceeds, spiritualizes the whole act. Those who confound spirit with matter,
the Absolute with the relative, cannot understand, due to want of candour, how
that which is apparently opposed to their experience of this world, can be necessarily, True on the plane of the
Absolute. But their stupidity happily does not abolish the Truth Himself. The
arrogance of the Pharisee misjudges the quality of the Magnanimous Arrogance of
Sree Gaursundar. This is the wholly deserved punishment of the hypocrite. It is
the only method by which even the Pharisee is saved and those who are
needlessly vain of their worldly virtues, are enlightened regarding their real
function towards others.
It is the
Nature of Krishna to excel every entity in whatever He does, with a single
exception. Krishna is always excelled by His devotee. One day the Lord happened
to be passing along the public streets in the company of a number of His
students who crowded on all sides of Him. The Lord was as richly dressed as a
king. He was clad in a yellow robe, like Krishna. His Lips were dyed with the
betel and His Holy Face had the splendour of a million Moons. All the people
were praising Him. They said, ‘He is verily the God of Love Himself Who has put
on His Visible Body.’ On His Forehead shone the tilaka mark pointing upwards.
His Beautiful Hands held His books. The Glance of His Lotus Eyes dispelled all
sorrow. The Lord was coming along merrily, swinging His Arms, in the company of
His students who were naturally of a most restless disposition. Sribas Pandit,
fell in with Him on the way quite by accident and burst into laughter as he
caught sight of the Lord. Nimai Pandit made obeisance to Sribas. The generous
Sribas blessed Him by way of response saying, ‘Live Thou for ever.’ Sribas then
laughingly asked, ‘Whither goest Thou, Crest-jewel of the Arrogant? Why waste
Thy. time in these vanities foregoing to serve Krishna? Why dost Thou teach Thy
students so, night and day without respite? Why do people read at all? Is it
not to learn devotion to Krishna? If that is not gained what does such learning
avail? For this reason be well-advised not pass all Thy time in such vanity.
Thou hast studied till now. It is high time for Thee to serve Krishna without
delay.’ The Lord replied smiling, ‘Be assured. revered Pandit, what you say
will certainly come to pass by your grace.’ Saying this the Lord proceeded
smiling to the bank of the Ganges and there re-joined the body of His pupils.
Sribas
Pandit, a Brahmana advanced in years, was accustomed to treat Sree Gaursundar
in the manner of a superior and well wisher who regarded his junior as an
object of his affectionate concern. Regarded from the point of view of
reverential service such conduct towards Godhead must appear as improper. The
same kind of objection would apply equally to Sandipani Muni, teacher of
Krishna, to Garga Muni who was family-priest of the chief of Braja and, in Gaur-Leela, to Brahmananda Puri,
co-disciple of Sree Isvara Puri. It is, however, a comparatively poor
conception of our relationship with Krishna to suppose that it should be
confined to distant reverence for the High and Mighty Godhead.
The idea
of the Absolute involved in the forms of reverential worship, is somewhat
analogous to our conduct in this world where the sentiment of reverence
precludes all really familiar intimacy. If a person who is situated on the
plane of this world affects to conduct himself towards Krishna as towards his
Chum or Junior he certainly perpetrates the grossest impropriety. The
philanthropists (prakrita sahajiyas) pretend
to think that it is possible to adopt the attitude of confidential intimacy
found in this world towards Sree Krishna while we are in the sinful state in
imaginary imitation of the similar feasible relationships of the absolute world
without committing the grossest profanation. At the same time it would be no
less untrue to suppose that the method of distant reverence itself is,
therefore, the only or proper kind of service of the Divinity.
The
method of distant reverence is based on an incomplete view of the Absolute and
does not therefore, belong to the highest plane. It is shy and diffident. It is
also indicative of a certain reserve of love. Reverential service is of course
not to be confounded with any form of hypocritical philanthropism. It is wholly
free from all error of judgment and is bound to develop by directing its closer
attention to its immature service of the Absolute. Contented reverential
service, nevertheless, resembles that of the overjoyed traveler who builds his
halfway house and prepares to settle down in it permanently under the
impression that he has reached the goal. It is not easy to persuade such a
traveler to resume his forward journey, especially if he has already built a
solid structure and is supported by a strong body of admirers and colleagues of
real purity of purpose. This is the form of service that is attainable in the
Majestic Realm of Vaikuntha which supplies the ideal of the current religions.
The latter are, however, really a veiled form of quasi-worldliness and often
tantamounts to a religious refusal to seek the fullest service of the Absolute.
Reverential worship especially in its degenerate forms, has proved the
determined foe of all impartial and thorough inquiry in the domain of religion,
no less effective than the pseudo
authoritative methods that were once prevalent in the sphere of worldly
knowledge. This unnatural form of worldliness aping the real service of
Vaikuntha has been accepted as the only legitimate form of religion by all
worldly persons who have been prepared to justify their practices by a sort of
ridiculous assumption that religion is necessarily opposed to science, i.e., to
the principle of free inquiry. But neither need the defects of the current
forms of religious orthodoxy lead any but a deliberately foolish or wicked
person to the serious conclusion that there is no such thing as the Absolute
Truth Whose Admitted existence is certainly the only real obstacle in the way
of all irresponsible free thinking so much affected by empiricists.