CAT 1: RELIGION WITH NO CONCEPTION OF GOD?

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, this questionnaire was sent to you by Bhavan's Journal, a cultural and religious magazine in Bombay. They are questioning various religious and spiritual leaders, trying to get the answers to some of the important questions that are perplexing people today. So there's a list of questions, and the first is this: "Is the influence of religion over the masses on the wane?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. This is predicted in Çrémad-Bhägavatam [12.2.1]:

tataç cänu-dinaà dharmaù
satyaà çaucaà kñamä dayä
kälena balinä räjan
naìkñyaty äyur balaà småtiù

"In Kali-yuga, this age of quarrel and hypocrisy, there shall be a waning of these qualities: religiosity, truthfulness, cleanliness, tolerance, memory, bodily strength, duration of life, and mercy." These are the human assets—qualities which make a human being distinct from the animals. But these things will decline. There will be almost no mercy, there will be almost no truthfulness, memory will be shortened, duration of life shortened. Similarly, religion will practically vanish. So that means gradually human beings will descend to the platform of animals.

Especially when there is no religion, human beings are simply animals. This any common man can distinguish—that a dog does not understand what religion is. The dog is also a living being, but he's not interested in what is being discussed here about Bhagavad-gétä or Çrémad-Bhägavatam. That is the distinction between man and dog: the animal is not interested. So when human beings are becoming uninterested in religion, then they're becoming animals.

And how can there be happiness or peace in animal society? The big leaders want to keep the citizenry as animals, and at the same time they are striving to make a United Nations. How is it possible? United Animals? Is it possible? Society for United Animals. [Laughter.] In the science of logic it is said, "Man is a rational animal." So when rationality is missing, one becomes simply an animal. What is the possibility of being a human being?

In human society, whether you are a Christian or a Muhammadan or a Hindu or a Buddhist, it doesn't matter. But there must be some system of religion—that is human society. And human society without religion—animal society. This is the plain fact. Why are people unhappy now? Because they are neglecting religion.

One gentleman has written me that Marx said, "Religion is the opium of the people." That means the Communists are very adamant against God consciousness because they think that religion has spoiled the whole social atmosphere. Religion might have been misused, but that does not mean that religion should be avoided. Real religion should be taken. Simply because religion has not been properly executed by the so-called priests, that does not mean religion should be rejected. If my eye is giving me some kind of trouble on account of a cataract, that doesn't mean my eye should be plucked out. The cataract should be removed. So that is the idea of the Kåñëa consciousness movement—to remove the cataract from people's religious vision.

Generally, modern so-called religious leaders have no conception of God, and yet they are preaching religion. What good is that religion? People are simply being misled. Real religion means God's order: dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam [SB 6.3.19]. If your religion has no conception of God, where is the question of religion? Still, without any conception of God, they are professing some religion. How long will it go on artificially? It will deteriorate. That ignorance about God has resulted in the present condition.

Religion means the order of God, just as law means the order of the state. Now, if in your social system there is no state, where is the question of the state's order? You will simply manufacture your own order. Today that is going on in the field of religion: there is no conception of God and therefore no following of God's order.

But we devotees of Kåñëa have a clear conception of God. Here is God: Kåñëa. And He's giving orders. We accept those orders. So it is clear religion. But if there is no conception of God, no order of God, then where is the question of religion? Ask someone in some other religious system what their conception of the form of God is. Can anyone tell clearly? Nobody can say. But we shall immediately say,

veëuà kvaëantam aravinda-daläyatäkñaà
barhävataàsam asitämbudha-sundaräìgam
kandarpa-koöi-kamanéya-viçeña-çobhaà
govindam ädi-puruñaà tam ahaà bhajämi

"I worship Govinda, the primeval Lord, who is adept at playing on His flute, whose eyes are like petals of a blooming lotus, whose head is bedecked with a peacock's feather, whose figure of beauty is tinged with the hue of blue clouds, and whose unique loveliness charms millions of Cupids." [Brahma-saàhitä 5.30]

Immediately, description—"Here is God." Then there is religion. And if there is no conception of God, where is the question of religion? Bogus. That is why religiosity and the other noble human qualities are declining. People have no conception of God, and therefore there is no understanding of religion. As a result, the whole human civilization is declining. And because it is declining, human beings are becoming more and more like animals.

CAT 2: PROGRESSING BEYOND "PROGRESS"

Puñöa Kåñëa: Question number two?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes.

Puñöa Kåñëa: "The traditional charge against Hinduism is that it is fatalistic, that it inhibits progress by making people slaves to the belief in the inevitability of what is to happen. How far is this charge true?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The charge is false. Those who have made that charge do not know what "Hinduism" is. First of all, the Vedic scriptures make no mention of such a thing as "Hinduism." but they do mention sanätana-dharma, the eternal and universal religion, and also varëäçrama-dharma, the natural organization of human society. That we can find in the Vedic scriptures.

So it is a false charge that the Vedic system inhibits the progress of mankind. What is that "progress"? A dog's jumping is progress? [Laughter.] A dog is running here and there on four legs, and you are running on four wheels. Is that progress?

The Vedic system is this: The human being has a certain amount of energy—better energy than the animals', better consciousness—and that energy should be utilized for spiritual advancement. So the whole Vedic system is meant for spiritual advancement. Human energy is employed in a more exalted direction than to compete with the dog.

Consequently, sometimes those who have no idea of religion notice that the Indian saintly persons are not working hard like dogs. Spiritually uncultured people think the dog race is life. But actual life is spiritual progress. Therefore the Çrémad-Bhägavatam [1.5.18] says,

tasyaiva hetoù prayateta kovido
na labhyate yad bhramatäm upary adhaù
tal labhyate duùkhavad anyataù sukhaà
kälena sarvatra gabhéra-raàhasä

The human being should exert his energy for that thing which he did not get in many, many lives. Through many, many lives the soul has been in the forms of dogs or demigods or cats or birds or insects. There are 8,400,000 material forms. So this transmigration is going on, but in every one of these millions of forms, the business is sense gratification. The dog is busy for sense gratification: "Where is food? Where is shelter? Where is a mate? How to defend?" And the man is also doing the same business, in different ways.

So this struggle for existence is going on, life after life. Even a small insect is engaging in the same struggle—ähära-nidrä-bhaya-maithunam—eating, sleeping, defending, and mating. Bird, beast, insect, fish—everywhere the same struggle: "Where is food? Where is sex? Where is shelter? How to defend?" So the çästra [scripture] says we have done these things in many, many past lives, and if we don't get out of this struggle for existence, we'll have to do them again in many, many future lives. So these things should be stopped.

Therefore Prahläda Mahäräja advises his friends [Çrémad-Bhägavatam 7.6.3],

sukham aindriyakaà daityä
deha-yogena dehinäm
sarvatra labhyate daiväd
yathä duùkham ayatnataù

"My dear friends, material pleasure—which is due simply to this material body—is essentially the same in any body. And just as misery comes without our trying for it, so the happiness we deserve will also come, by higher arrangement." A dog has a material body, and I have a material body. So my sex pleasure and the dog's sex pleasure is the same. Of course, a dog is not afraid of having sex on the street, in front of everyone. We hide it in a nice apartment. That's all. But the activity is the same. There is no difference.

Still, people are taking this sex pleasure between a man and woman in a nice decorated apartment as very advanced. But this is not advanced. And yet they are making a dog's race for this "advancement." Prahläda Mahäräja says we are imagining that there are different types of pleasure on account of different types of body, but the pleasure is fundamentally the same.

Naturally, according to the different types of body, there are some external differences in the pleasure, but the basic amount and quality of this pleasure has very well defined limitations. That is called destiny. A pig has a certain type of body, and his eatable is stool. This is destined. You cannot change it—"Let the pig eat halavä." That is not possible. Because the soul has a particular type of body, he must eat a particular type of food. Can anyone, any scientist, improve the standard of living of a pig? Is it possible? [Laughter.]

Therefore Prahläda Mahäräja says that everything about material pleasure is already fixed. The uncivilized men in the jungle are having the same sex pleasure as the so-called civilized men who boast, "Instead of living in that hut made of leaves, we are living in a skyscraper building. This is advancement."

But Vedic civilization says, "No, this is not advancement. Real advancement is self-realization—how much you have realized your relationship with god."

Sometimes people misunderstand, thinking that sages who try for self-realization are lazy. In a high court a judge is sitting soberly, apparently doing nothing, and he is getting the highest salary. And another man in the same court—he's working hard all day long, rubber-stamping, and he is getting not even one-tenth of the judge's salary. He's thinking, "I am so busy and working so hard, yet I am not getting a good salary. And this man is just sitting on the bench, and he's getting such a fat salary." The criticism of Hinduism as "inhibiting progress" is like that: it comes out of ignorance. The Vedic civilization is for self-realization.  It is meant for the intelligent person, the person who will not just work like an ass but who will try for that thing which he did not achieve in so many other lives—namely, self-realization.

For example, we are sometimes labeled "escapists." What is the charge?

Disciple: They say we are escaping from reality.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes, we are escaping their reality. But their reality is a dog's race, and our reality is to advance in self-realization, Kåñëa consciousness. That is the difference. Therefore the mundane, materialistic workers have been described as müòhas, asses. Why? Because the ass works very hard for no tangible gain. He carries on his back tons of cloth for the washerman, and the washerman in return gives him a little morsel of grass. Then the ass stands at the washerman's door, eating the grass, while the washerman loads him up again. The ass has no sense to think, "If I get out of the clutches of this washerman, I can get grass anywhere. Why am I carrying so much?"

The mundane workers are like that. They're busy at the office, very busy. If you want to see the fellow, "I am very busy now." [Laughter.] So what is the result of your being so busy? "Well, I take two pieces of toast and one cup of tea. That's all." [Laughter.] And for this purpose you are so busy?

 Or, he is busy all day simply so that in the evening he can look at his account books and say, "Oh, the balance had been one thousand dollars—now it has become two thousand." That is his satisfaction. But still he will have the same two pieces of bread and one cup of tea, even though he has increased his balance from one thousand to two thousand. And still he'll work hard. This is why karmés are called müòhas. They work like asses, without any real aim of life.

But Vedic civilization is different. The accusation implied in the question is not correct. In the Vedic system, people are not lazy. They are very busy working for a higher purpose. And that busy-ness is so important that Prahläda Mahäräja says, kaumära äcaret präjïo: [SB 7.6.1] "Beginning from childhood, one should work for self-realization." One should not lose a second's time. So that is Vedic civilization.

Of course, the materialistic workers—they see, "These men are not working like us, like dogs and asses. So they are escaping."

Yes, escaping your fruitless endeavor.

The Vedic civilization of self-realization begins from the varëäçrama system of social organization. Varnäçramäcäravatä puruñeëa paraù pumän viñëur ärädhyate: "Everyone should offer up the fruits of his occupational duty to the lotus feet of the Lord Viñëu , or Kåñëa." That is why the Vedic system is called varëäçrama—literally, "social organization with a spiritual perspective."

The varëäçrama system has four social and four spiritual divisions. the social divisions are the brähmaëas [teachers and priests], kñatriyas [administrators and military men], vaiçyas [farmers and merchants], and çüdras [laborers and craftsmen], while the spiritual divisions are the brahmacärés [students], gåhasthas [householders], vänaprasthas [retirees], and sannyäsés [renunciants]. But the ultimate goal is viñëur ärädhyate—the worship of the Supreme Lord, Viñëu , by all. That is the idea.

But the members of the modern so-called civilization do not know of varëäçrama. Therefore they have created a society that is simply a dog's race. The dog is running on four legs, and thay are running on four wheels. That's all. And they think the four-wheel race is advancement of civilization.

Vedic civilization is different. As Närada Muni says, tasyaiva hetoù prayateta kovido na labhyate yad bhramatäm upary adhaù: the learned, astute person will use this life to gain what he has missed in countless prior lives—namely, realization of self and realization of God. Someone may ask, "Then shall we do nothing?" Yes do nothing simply to improve your material position. Whatever material happiness is allotted for you by destiny, you'll get it wherever you are. Take to Kåñëa consciousness. You'll get these other things besides.

"How shall I get them?"

How? Kälena sarvatra gabhéra-raàhasä: by the arrangement of eternal time, everything will come about in due course. The example is given that even though you do not want distress, still distress comes upon you. Similarly, even if you do not work hard for the happiness that is destined to be yours, still it will come.

Similarly, Prahläda Mahäräja says, na tat-prayäsaù kartavyam: you should not waste your energy for material happiness, because you cannot get more than what you are destined to ha That is not possible. "How can I believe it—that by working harder I will not get more material happiness than I would otherwise have had?"

Because you are undergoing so many distressing conditions even though you do not want them. Who wants distress? For example, in our country, Mahatma Gandhi was killed by his own countrymen. He was a great man, he was protected by so many followers, he was beloved by all—and still he was killed. Destiny. Who can protect you from all these distressing conditions?

"So," you should conclude, "if these distressing conditions come  upon me by force, the other kind of condition, the opposite number, will also come. Therefore why shall I waste my time trying to avoid distress and gain so-called happiness? Let me utilize my energy for Kåñëa consciousness." That is intelligence. You cannot check your destiny. The magazine's question touches on this point.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Yes, the usual charge is that this Vedic system of civilization is fatalistic, and that as a result people are not making as much material progress as they otherwise would.

Çréla Prabhupäda: No, no, the Vedic system is not fatalistic. It is fatalistic only in the sense that one's material destiny cannot be changed. But your spiritual life is in your hands. our point is this: The whole Vedic civilization is based on the understanding that destiny allows only a certain amount of material happiness in this world, and that our efforts should therefore be directed toward self-realization. Nobody is enjoying uninterrupted material happiness. That is not possible. A certain amount of material happiness and a certain amount of material distress—these both must be present always. So just as you cannot check your distressing condition of life, similarly you cannot check your happy condition of life. It will come automatically. Therefore, don't waste your time with these things. better you utilize your energy for advancing in Kåñëa consciousness.

Puñöa Kåñëa: So then, Çréla Prabhupäda, would it be accurate, after all, to say that people who have this Vedic conception would not try for progress?

Çréla Prabhupäda: No, no. "Progress"—first you must understand what actual progress is. The thing is that if you try to progress vainly, what is the use of trying? If it is a fact you cannot change your material destiny, why should you try for that? Rather, whatever energy you have, utilize it for understanding Kåñëa consciousness. That is real progress. Make your spiritual understanding—your understanding of God and self—perfectly clear.

For instance, in our International Society for Krishna Consciousness, our main business is how to make advancement in Kåñëa consciousness. We are not enthusiastic about opening big, big factories with big, big money-earning machines. No. We are satisfied with whatever material happiness and distress we are destined. But we are very eager to utilize our energy for progressing in Kåñëa consciousness. This is the point.

So the Vedic system of civilization is meant for realizing God: viñëur ärädhyate. In the Vedic system, people try for that. Actually, the followers of varëäçrama-dharma—they never tried for economic development. You'll find in India, still, millions of people taking bath in the Ganges during Kumbha-melä. Have you have been to the Kumbha-melä festival?

Disciple: No.

Çréla Prabhupäda: At the Kumbha-melä, millions of people come to take bath in the Ganges because they are interested in how to become spiritually liberated from this material world. They're not lazy. They tavel thousands of miles to take bath in the Ganges at the holy place of Prayag. So although they are not busy in the dog's race, these people are not lazy. Yä niçä sarva-bhütänäà tasyäà jägarti saàyamé: "What is night for ordinary beings is the time of wakefulness for the self-controlled." The self-controlled man wakes up very early—practically in the middle of the night—and works for spiritual realization while others are sleeping. Similarly, during the daytime the dogs and asses think, "We are working, but these spiritualists, they are not working."

So there are two different platforms, the material and the spiritual. Followers of the Vedic civilization, which is practiced in India—although nowadays it is distorted—actually, these people are not lazy. They are very, very busy. Not only very, very busy, but also kaumära äcaret präjïo dharmän bhägavatän iha: [SB 7.6.1] they are trying to become self-realized from the very beginning of life. They are so busy that they want to begin the busy-ness from their very childhood. Therefore it is wrong to think they are lazy.

People who accuse followers of Vedic civilization of laziness or of "inhibiting progress" do not know what real progress is. The Vedic civilization is not interested in the false progress of economic development. For instance, sometimes people boast, "We have gone from the hut to the skyscraper." They think this is progress. But in the Vedic system of civilization, one thinks about how much he is advanced in self-realization. He may live in a hut and become very advanced in self-realzation. But if he wastes his time turning his hut into a skyscraper, then his whole life is wasted, finished. And  in his next life he is going to be a dog, although he does not know it. That's all.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, then this question may be raised: If destiny cannot be checked, then why not, when a child is born, simply let him run around like an animal? And whatever happens to him . . .

Çréla Prabhupäda: No. That is the advantage of this human form of life. You can train the child spiritually. That is possible. Therefore it is said, tasyaiva hetoù prayeteta kovido: use this priceless human form to attain what you could not attain in so many millions of lower forms. For that spiritual purpose you should engage your energy. That advantage is open to you now, in the human form. Ahaituky apratihatä: pure devotional service to the Lord, Kåñëa consciousness, is open to you now, and it cannot be checked. Just as your advancement of so-called material happiness is already destined and cannot be checked, similarly, your advancement in spiritual life cannot be checked—if you endeavor for it. No one can check your spiritual advancement. Try to understand this.

Puñöa Kåñëa: So, then, we can't say that the Vedic system, or sanätana-dharma, is fatalistic. There actually is endeavor for progress.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Certainly—spiritual progress. As for the question of "fatalistic," I have often given this example: Let us say a man is condemmed by a court of law to be hanged. Nobody can check it. Even the same judge who gave the verdict cannot check it. But if the man begs for the mercy of the king, the king can check the execution. He can go totally above the law. Therefore the Brahma-saàhitä [5.54] says, karmäëi nirdahati kintu ca bhakti-bhäjäm: destiny can be changed by Kåñëa for His devotees; otherwise it is not possible.

therefore our only business should be to surrender to Kåñëa. And if you artificially want to be more happy by economic development, that is not possible.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Question number three?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Hm? No. First of all make sure that everything is clear. Why are you so eager to progress? [Laughter.]

Try to understand what is what. The first thing is that your destiny cannot be changed. That's a fact. But in spite of your destiny, if you try for Kåñëa consciousness, you can achieve spiritual success. Otherwise, why did Prahläda Mahäräja urge his friends, kaumära äcäret: "Take Kåñëa consciousness up from your very childhood"? If destiny cannot be changed, then why was Prahläda Mahäräja urging this? Generally, "destiny" means your material future. That you cannot chnge. But even that can be changed when you are in spiritual life.

Puñöa Kåñëa: What is the meaning of apratihatä? You said that spiritual development cannot be checked.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Apratihatä means this: Suppose you are destined to suffer. So apratihatä means that in spite of your so-called destiny to suffer, if you take to Kåñëa consciousness your suffering will be reduced, or there will be no suffering—and in spite of any suffering, you can make progress in spiritual life. Just like Prahläda Mahäräja himself. His father put him into so many suffering conditions, but he was not impeded—he made spiritual progress. He didn't care about his father's attempts to make him suffer. That state of existence is called apratihatä: if you want to execute Kåñëa consciousness, your material condition of life cannot check it. That is the real platform of progress.

Of course, insofar as your material condition is concerned, generally that cannot be checked. You have to suffer. But in the case of a devotee, that suffering also can be stopped or minimized. Otherwise, Kåñëa's statement would be false: ahaà tväà sarva-päpebhyo mokñayiñyämi—"I will deliver you from all the reactions to your sinful activities." Suffering must befall me on account of my sinful activities, but Kåñëa says, "I will deliver you from all the reactions to your sinful activities." This should be clear. Ordinarily, destiny cannot be checked. Therefore, instead of wasting your time trying to change your economic condition or material destiny apart from Kåñëa consciousness, you should employ your priceless human energy for attaining Kåñëa consciousness, which cannot be checked.

We see so many men working so hard. Does this mean that every one of them will become a Ford, a Rockefeller? Why not? Everyone is trying his best. But Mr. Ford was destined to become a rich man. His destiny was there, and so he became a rich man. Another man may work just as hard as Ford, but this does not mean he will become as rich as Ford. This is practical. You cannot change your destiny simply by working hard like asses and dogs. No. But you can utilize your special human energy for improving your Kåñëa consciousness. That's a fact.

Disciple: Çréla Prabhupäda, if destiny cannot be changed, what does Kåñëa mean when He says, "Be thou happy by this sacrifice"?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Do you know what is meant by "sacrifice"?

Disciple: Sacrifice to Viñëu , to Kåñëa.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. That means pleasing Kåñëa. If Kåñëa is pleased, He can change destiny. Karmäëi nirdahati kintu ca bhakti-bhäjäm: [Bs. 5.54] for those who serve Him with love and devotion, Kåñëa can change destiny. So sacrifice, yajïa, means pleasing Kåñëa. Our whole Kåñëa consciousness movement means pleasing Kåñëa. That is the whole program. In all other business, there is no question of pleasing Kåñëa. When one nation declares war upon another, there is no question of pleasing Kåñëa or serving Kåñëa. They're pleasing their own senses, serving their own whims. When the First and Second World Wars began, it was not for pleasing Kåñëa. The Germans wanted that their sense gratification not be hampered by the Britishers. That means it was a war of sense gratification. "The Britishers are achieving their sense gratification; we cannot. All right, fight." So there was no question of pleasing Kåñëa. Hm. Next question?

CAT 3: CONCOCTED RELIGION

Puñöa Kåñëa: Question number three. "It is said that the greatest strength of Hinduism is its catholicity, or breadth of outlook, but that this is also its greatest weakness, in that there are very few common prescribed religious observances which are obligatory for all, as in other religions. Is it necessary and possible to outline certain basic minimum observances for all Hindus?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: So far as the Vedic religion is concerned, it is not simply for the so-called Hindus. That is to be understood. This is sanätana-dharma, the eternal and universal nature and duty of every living being. It is for all living entities, all living beings. That is why it is called sanätana-dharma. That I have already explained. The living entity is sanätana, or eternal; God is sanätana; and there is sanätana-dhäma, the Lord's eternal abode. As Kåñëa describes in the Bhagavad-gétä [8.20], paras tasmät tu bhävo 'nyo vyakto 'vyaktät sanätanaù: "Yet there is another unmanifest nature, which is eternal." And in the Eleventh Chapter Kåñëa Himself is described as sanätanaù. Do you remember? He is described as sanätanaù, the supreme eternal.

So actually, the Vedic system is called sanätana-dharma, not Hindu dharma. This is a wrong conception. This sanätana-dharma is meant for all living entities, not just the so-called Hindus. The very term "Hindu" is a misconception. The Muslims referred to the Indian people, who lived on the other side of the river Sind, as "Sindus"—actually, due to the peculiarities of pronunciation, as "Hindus." In any case, the Muslims called India "Hindustan," which means "the land on the other side of the river Sind, or 'Hind.'" Otherwise, "Hindustan" has no Vedic reference. So this "Hindu dharma" has no Vedic reference.

The real Vedic dharma is sanätana-dharma, or varëäçrama-dharma. First of all, one has to understand this. Now that sanätana-dharma, or Vedic dharma, is being disobeyed, distorted, and misrepresented, it has come to be misunderstood as "Hinduism." That is a fake understanding. That is not the real understanding. We have to study sanätana-dharma, or varëäçrama-dharma. Then we'll understand what the Vedic religion is.

Every living entity is eternal, sanätana. God is also eternal, and we can live with God in His sanätana-dhäma, His eternal abode. This reciprocation is called sanätana-dharma, the eternal nature and duty of the living being. So Vedic religion means this sanätana-dharma, not "Hindu dharma." Read the verse from Bhagavad-gétä that describes Kåñëa as sanätanaù.

Radha-vallabha:

tvam akñaraà paramaà veditavyaà
tvam asya viçvasya paraà nidhänam
tvam avyayaù çäçvata-dharma-goptä
sanätanas tvaà puruño mato me

"You are the supreme primal objective You are the ultimate resting place of this universe. You are inexhaustible, and You are the supreme eternal. You are the maintainer of the eternal religion, the Personality of Godhead. This is my opionion." [Bhagavad-gétä 11.18]

Çréla Prabhupäda: This understanding is wanted. Kåñëa is eternal, we are eternal, and the place where we will live with Him and exchange our feelings—that is eternal. And the system which teaches this eternal system of reciprocation—that is called sanätana-dharma, the eternal religion. It is meant for everyone.

Puñöa Kåñëa: How can people follow sanätana-dharma on a practical, daily basis?

Çréla Prabhupäda: How are we doing it? Is it not practical? Kåñëa requests, man-manä bhava mad-bhakto mad-yäjé mäà namaskuru: "Always think of Me, become My devotee, worship Me, and offer your obeisances to Me." Where is the impracticality? Where is the difficulty? And Kåñëa promises, mäm evaiñyasy asaàñaya: "If you do this, you'll come to Me. Without any doubt you'll come to Me." Why don't you do that?

Later Kåñëa requests, sarva-dharmän parityajya mäm ekaà çaraëaà vraja: [Bg. 18.66] "Give up all varieties of concocted religion and simply surrender to Me." This is practical religion. Just surrender to Kåñëa and think, "I am a devotee of Kåñëa, a servant of Kåñëa." Take this simple approach. Then everything will be immediately done. Real dharma, real religion, means dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam: [SB 6.3.19] what God says, that is dharma. Now, God says, "give up all this concocted dharma and just surrender unto Me." So take that dharma.

Why don't you take Kåñëa's instruction? Why do you go outside His instruction? That is the cause of all your troubles. You do not know the difference between this sanätana-dharma, the real, eternal religion, and your concocted dharma. If you take to some false religious system, then you suffer. But if you take to the real religious system, then you'll be happy.

Of course, nowadays India, like the rest of the world, has also given up the real religious system—sanätana-dharma, or varëäçrama-dharma. In India they have accepted a hodgepodge thing  called "Hinduism." So there is trouble. Everywhere, but in India especially, people should know that the real religion is this Vedic system. Vedic religion means varëäçrama-dharma. Kåñëa says—God says—cätur-varëyaà mayä såñöam: [Bg. 4.13] "For spiritual and material progress, the four occupational divisions of society have been set up by Me." So that is obligatory, just as the state law is obligatory. You cannot say, "I don't accept this law." No. You have to accept it if you want to have a happy life. You cannot become an outlaw. Then you'll not be happy. You'll be punished.

Now, God says, mayä såñöam: "This varëäçrama system is given by Me." So how can we refuse to follow it? that means we are denying the real religion. Dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam: [SB 6.3.19] real dharma, real religion, means the order given by God. And God says, cätur-varëyaà mayä såñöam guëa-karma-vibhägaçaù: "For the proper management of human society, I have created these four social divisions, based on people's qualities and actions." So you have to accept it.

Puñöa Kåñëa: This would be the prescription for all people?

Çréla Prabhupäda: For everyone. At the head of the social body there must be the intelligent class of men, who will give advice; then there must be the administrative and protective class, the farming and mercantile class, and the laboring class. This is all given in the Bhagavad-gétä: brähmaëa, kñatriya, vaiçya, çüdra.

But when you fully surrender to Kåñëa, you can give up all the regulations pertaining to these four social classes. That is why Kåñëa says, sarva-dharmän parityajya: [Bg. 18.66] "In the ultimate issue, My instruction is to give up all religious formularies"—including even Vedic formularies—"and simply surrender to Me." "Brähmaëa-dharma," "kñatriya-dharma,""Hindu dharma," this dharma, that dharma—give all these up and simply surrender to Kåñëa, because the ultimate aim of dharma is to come to Kåñëa. "You directly come to Me; then everything is all right."

Disciple: So many people concoct their own system and say, "This is the way to go to God."

Çréla Prabhupäda: Then let them suffer. What can be done? If you don't accept the laws of the state and you manufacture your own laws, then you'll suffer. The state says, "Keep to the right." But if you make your own law—"No, I will keep to the left"—then you'll suffer. It's a fact.

Kåñëa is personally advising: sarva-dharmän parityajya mäm ekaà çaraëaà vraja: [Bg. 18.66] "Give up all your concocted religions and surrender to Me alone." take His advice and be happy.

CAT 4: CASTE SYSTEM CAST OUT

Puñöa Kåñëa: Next question, Çréla Prabhupäda. "Will the fundamental values of the Vedic religion be in any way affected by the eradication of the caste system, toward which a concerted effort is now being made at all levels?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The Vedic system of religion we have been describing—the varëäçrama system  created by Kåñëa—is not to be confused with the present-day caste system—determination of social divisions by birth. But as to eradication of all social divisions, it cannot be done. This is still more foolishness, because Kåñëa Himself says, cätur-varëyaà mayä såñöam guëa-karma-vibhägaçaù: [Bg. 4.13] "This system of four social divisions, according to quality and work, is ordained by Me." But the difficulty is that this so-called caste system has come in, on account of the false notion that in order to be a brähmaëa, one must be the son of a brähmaëa. That is the caste system. But Kåñëa does not say that. He says "according to quality and work." He never says "according to birth." So this so-called caste system in India is a false notion of cätur-varëyaà, the system of four social divisions. The real system of cätur-varëyaà means guëa-karma-vibhägaçaù, determination of the four social divisions according to quality and work. One must be qualified.

And how does one become qualified? That is also described. For instance, in Bhagavad-gétä Kåñëa describes the qualities of a brähmaëa as follows: çamo damas tapaù çaucaà kñäntir ärjavam eva ca jïänam vijïänam ästikyam [Bg. 18.42]. "Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, knowledge, wisdom, and religiousness." So people who want to become brähmaëas must be educated to acquire these qualities. It is not enough simply to abolish the caste system, which is contaminated by the false conception of qualification by birthright. Certainly, this wrong caste system should be abolished. Also, educational centers should be opened for teaching people how to become genuine brähmaëas and kñatriyas. Guëa-karma-vibhägaçaù: according to their qualities and work, people naturally belong to different social groupings. So you cannot avoid it, but because you have created a false caste system, that should be abolished, and the system recommended by Kåñëa—that should be adopted.

In any event, you cannot avoid the natural occurrence of various social divisions. Nature's caste system will remain. Take, for example, the brahminical quality of truthfulness. All over the world, wherever you go, you'll find at least one person who is truthful. Does anyone say, "Oh, his father was truthful—therefore, he is truthful"? This is nonsense. Kåñëa never says anything like this. The father may be Hiraëyakaçipu, a big demon, but his son can still be Prahläda, a great devotee of the Lord. It is not that one will inevitably become exactly like one's father. Of course, it may be; there is every possibility. But still it is not a fact that the son unavoidably becomes like the father.

Our point is, wherever you go, you'll find a first-class man who is truthful. Now, wherever you find a truthful man, you can classify him as a brähmaëa and train him to serve the social body in that capacity, as a spiritual teacher and advisor. That is wanted. Why assume, "Here is the son of a truthful man; therefore he is truthful, a brähmaëa"? That is a misconception. You have to find the truthful men all over the world and train them as brähmaëas. That we are doing. "If you follow these principles—no illicit sex, no intoxication, no gambling, no meat-eating—you are a brähmaëa. Come on and receive further training." The fellow's father may be a meat-eater or a gambler or a drunkard, but if he himself is truthful and agreeable to the brahminical life, then tell him, "All right, come on—you are welcome." Then everything will be all right.

You could not abolish the truthful class of men even if you wanted to. You'll find truthful men everywhere. You simply have to train them. So Kåñëa says, cätur-varëyaà mayä såñöam guëa-karma-vibhägaçaù: [Bg. 4.13] according to their qualities and work, you take some men and put them in the brahminical class, others in the kñatriya class, still others in the vaiçya class, and the rest in the çüdra class. But you cannot abolish that system. That is a false attempt.

Puñöa Kåñëa: You're saying the natural system is to classify a person and train him for a particular duty, according to his particular inner qualities and his particular propensity to act.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. That classification is wanted. That must be there.

Puñöa Kåñëa: And what will be the benefit of classifying and training people according to their own qualities and propensities?

Çréla Prabhupäda: The benefit will be that the whole social body will function harmoniously. The social body must have a brain and arms and a belly and legs to be complete. If there is no brain, no head, then what is the use of these arms and legs and belly? It is all dead. So in human society, if there is not a class of learned, truthful, and honest men—men with all the brahminical qualifications—then society is ruined. That is why people are perplexed. Today almost everyone is trained to be a çüdra, a laborer: "Go to the factory." That's all. "Go to the factory and get money." And when the man gets some money, he immediately purchases wine and women. So if you try to make society classless, you'll produce such men—useless men, disturbing to the social body. You cannot make society classless. If you try to make it classless, naturally people will all be çüdras, fourth-class men, and worse. Then there will be social chaos.

Puñöa Kåñëa: But can all people take an equal interest in religion, despite their belonging to different social classifications?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. This I have already explained, that any civilized human being—he has got some religion. Now, the basic principles of religion are the statements made by God. So here in the Vedic system is what God says. If you take to this system, then the social body will be perfect, not only for Hindus but also for Christians, for Muhammadans, for everyone. And that is being practically realized in our Kåñëa consciousness movement. We have got devotees from all groups of human society, and they are taking to this Vedic system. It is practical. There is no difficulty. So Hindus, Muslims, Christians—everyone should take to this Kåñëa religion and become "Krishnites," "Krishnians." [Laughter.] The Greek word Christo comes from the Sanskrit Krishna. In fact, another spelling of Krishna is Krishta. So actually, if we take the root meaning,"Christian" means "Krishtian" or "Krishnian." So that is a controversial point, but everyone can take to Kåñëa. Then everything will be settled up.

CAT 5: ETERNAL TRUTHS VS. EVERYDAY REALITIES

Puñöa Kåñëa: Would you like to hear another question, Çréla Prabhupäda?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes.

Puñöa Kåñëa: "It is said that whereas the çrutis [the four original Vedas, the upaniñads, and the Vedänta-sütra] embody eternal truths, the småtis [the Puräëas, the Mahäbhärata, the Rämäyaëa, and corollary Vedic literature] embody the rules of conduct and thus need to be revised according to the dictates of the changing times. Will such a view be acceptable to all sections of society, and if so, how can the new småtis come into being, and who will give them sanction and sanctity?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The småtis are given by the Lord and His representatives. They come from spiritual authorities such as Lord Caitanya Mahäprabhu. The çästra, or scripture, also gives this authority. For instance, for this age, Kali-yuga, the Lord has prescribed a special means of God-realization—the chanting of His holy name. Småtis such as the Båhan-näradéya Puräëa say the same thing—that in this age of Kali-yuga, the only possible means of God-realization is chanting the Lord's name. In the Bhägavata Puräëa [12.3.51] also, Çukadeva Gosvämé directs,

kaler doña-nidhe räjann
asti hy eko mahän guëaù
kértanäd eva kåñëasya
mukta-saìgaù paraà vrajet

"Although in this age there are so many faults—it is truly an ocean of faults—still, there is one very great advantage: simply by chanting the Hare Kåñëa mantra, one becomes fully purified and is liberated from all material miseries." So this småti injunction we should take up, and actually we see all over the world how it is purifying all sections of people. Take to this chanting of Hare Kåñëa; then çruti, småti, everything will be fulfilled. This is the easiest method. Kértanäd eva kåñëasya mukta-saìgaù paraà vrajet: chant the Lord's holy name and you'll be liberated.

Puñöa Kåñëa: So the çrutis are eternally relevant and constant?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes, everything is based on the çrutis. as the Vedänta-sütra says, anävåttiù çabdät: simply by chanting the Lord's names and instructions—His sound vibration—one becomes spiritually realized. Çabda brahman means "spiritual sound vibration," and as the Vedänta-sütra instructs us, by chanting this spiritual sound vibration—the instructions and holy name of the Lord—one can become liberated.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Also, the småtis are directly based on the original çrutis?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes, for instance, Bhagavad-gétä is considered småti. And Bhagavad-gétä also says, satatäà kértayanto mäà yatantaç ca dåòha-vratäù: [Bg. 9.14] "Fully endeavoring with determination, the great souls are always chanting My glories." And as the Bhakti-rasämåta-sindhu, which is also considered småti, explains: çruti-småti-puräëädi [BRS [i]1.2.101]—the great devotees heed both the çrutis and the småtis. Another småti, Båhan-näradéya Puräëa, enjoins, harer näma harer näma harer nämaiva kevalam: "In this age of quarrel, the only way to realize the Lord is to chant His holy name, chant His holy name, chant His holy name." So because He was in the role of a great devotee, Lord Caitanya followed these injunctions of çruti and småti. Kåñëa-varëaà tviñäkåñëaà säìgopäìgästra-pärñadam [SB 11.5.32]. Kåñëam varëayati: Lord Caitanya was always chanting Hare Kåñëa. These examples are evidence that the småtis are directly based on the çrutis. So introduce this Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra. Everyone will be purified.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Is småti more than just rules of conduct?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. Here is what småti means:

The four original Vedas are considered çruti. But simply by hearing them, one cannot understand fully. Therefore, the småtis have explained further. Purayati iti puräëa: by hearing the Puräëas and other småtis, one makes his understanding complete. The Vedic mantras are not always understood. For instance, the Vedänta, which is çruti, begins with the mantra janmädy asya yataù: [SB 1.1.1] "The Supreme is that being from whom everything has emanated." This is very abbreviated. But the Çrémad-Bhägavatam, which is småti, explains, janmädy asya yato 'nvayäd itarataç cärtheñv abhijïäù sva-rät: [SB 1.1.1] "The Supreme Being, from whom everything has emanated, is directly and indirectly cognizant of everything and is fully independent." In this way the småti explains the çruti.

So whether you take çruti or småti, the subject matter is the same. Both çruti and småti are spiritual evidence. We cannot do without either of them. As Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé says in the Bhakti-rasämåta-sindhu [1.2.101],

çruti-småti-puräëädi-
païcarätra-vidhià vinä
aikäntiki harer bhaktir
utpätäyaiva kalpate
 [BRS [ii]1.2.101]

You cannot become purified or actually God conscious without reference to both çruti and småti. So as we push on this Kåñëa consciousness movement, it is not whimsical. It is based on

çruti, småti, and païcarätriki-vidhi, the principles of çruti, småti, and the Närada-païcarätra. Therefore, it is becoming effective

Puñöa Kåñëa: Nevertheless, Çréla Prabhupäda, the question asks, "Do the småtis need to be revised according to the changing times?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: They cannot be changed.

Puñöa Kåñëa: The småtis cannot be changed?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Nothing can be changed. But according to the time, you have to apply the principles properly. For instance, in Kali-yuga the småti order is kértanäd eva kåñëasya mukta-saìgaù paraà vrajet: to obtain spiritual liberation, one must chant the holy name of the Lord, Hare Kåñëa. So you have to do this. For instance, a doctor may order, "In the morning, take this medicine; in the evening, take that medicine." It is not a change of the doctor's orders. It is simply that according to the time, the doctor's orders call for a particular medicine. But the particular medicine is recommended by the doctor, not by your whims. Çruti and småti cannot be changed, but they may recommend a particular process at a particular time. So there must be adherence to both çruti and småti—to scriptural authority. You cannot modify.

Puñöa Kåñëa: There is no question, then, of—as the magazine puts it—"new småti."

Çréla Prabhupäda: No. New småti? they may take it as "new småti," but småti is småti—it is not new. In any spiritual statement, you have to give references to çruti and småti. Otherwise, it is not valid. There must be veda-pramäëa, çabda-pramäëa: evidence from the Vedas and from the explanatory Vedic literature. Otherwise, there is no evidence. Your statement is not valid: you cannot change the original çruti-småti. But you have to take their particular recommendation for the particular time, just as Kåñëa Caitanya Mahäprabhu did when He urged His followers to heed the injunction of Båhan-näradéya Puräëa [3.8.126]:

harer näma harer näma
harer nämaiva kevalam
kalau nästy eva nästy eva
nästy eva gatir anyathä
 [Adi 17.21]

"Chant the holy name, chant the holy name, chant the holy name of Kåñëa. In the present age of quarrel and anxiety, there is no other way to attain God realization, no other way, no other way." So çruti-småti-pramäëa—citing evidence from the Vedas and the corollary literature—is the only method for making a spiritual statement. You have to take it.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Can anyone change …

Çréla Prabhupäda: No!

Puñöa Kåñëa: … the rules of conduct as described in the småtis?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Nobody can change them. But these particular rules and regulations in çruti-småti are for particular times, particular circumstances. So we have to take these rules and regulations. You cannot change them.

Puñöa Kåñëa: And who will sanction a particular application for a particular time and place?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. This was done by Lord Çré Kåñëa Caitanya. When he appeared five hundred years ago, he sanctioned the application of çruti-småti because He's a genuine authority. He's a genuine äcärya. And we are following in the footsteps of Caitanya Mahäprabhu. It is not whimsical. You have to follow the authority in all circumstances.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Is this Vedic religion, this sanätana-dharma, so broad that everyone is included?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. Sanätana means "eternal." As Kåñëa says in the Bhagavad-gétä, na hanyate hanyamäne çarére: [Bg. 2.20] "The living entity within the body is not destroyed when the body is destroyed, because he is eternal." So that eternality belongs to everyone. Not that the Hindus, after giving up this body, exist, and the Muslims or Christians do not exist. Everyone exists eternally. So sanätana-dharma is meant for everyone.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Then is there anyone actually outside of sanätana-dharma?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Nobody is actually outside. Everyone is an eternal spirit soul, and therefore everyone is meant for the eternal religion, sanätana-dharma. You may think that you are not an eternal spirit soul, but that is simply illusion. There are so many rascals who think that with the death of the body, everything is finished. They may think so, but that is not a fact. Similarly, you may think, "I am not a sanätana-dharmé—a follower of sanätana-dharma—I am a Christian," but actually you are a sanätana-dharmé. Of course, if you wish to think otherwise, you can. Who can check it?

Hari-sauri: So whether one can be accepted as following sanätana-dharma depends on how one acts?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. If one does not act accord to the rules and regulations of sanätana-dharma, that is his business. That's all.

CAT 6: THE ULTIMATE KNOWLEDGE

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, this is the next question: "In the Kali-yuga, the current age of quarrel and hypocrisy, bhakti [devotional service to the Lord] has been described as the most suitable and easiest of paths for God realization. Yet how is it that Vedantic teachings, with their accent on jïäna [cultivation of knowledge], are being given the pride of place by noted savants?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The so-called Vedantists, the Mäyävädés [impersonalists], are bluffers. They do not know what Vedänta is. But people want to be bluffed, and the bluffers take advantage of it. the two words combined in the word Vedänta are veda and anta. Veda means "knowledge," and anta means "goal" or "end." so Vedänta means "the end of all knowledge, or veda." Now, in the Bhagavad-gétä Lord Kåñëa says, vedaiç ca sarvair aham eva vedyaù: [Bg. 15.15] "By all the Vedas I am to be known." So the whole Vedänta-sütra is a description of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

The first statement in the Vedänta-sütra is athäto brahma jijïäsä: "Now, having attained a human birth, one should inquire into Brahman, the Absolute Truth." In a nutshell, Brahman is then described: janmädy asya yataù [SB 1.1.1]—"Brahman is the origin of everything." And in Bhagavad-gétä Kåñëa says, ahaà sarvasya prabhavaù: "I am the origin of everything." So, again, the Vedänta-sütra actually describes Kåñëa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Now, because Çréla Vyäsadeva knew that in this Kali-yuga people would not be able to study Vedänta-sütra nicely on account of a lack of education, he personally wrote a commentary on the Vedänta-sütra. That commentary is Çrémad-Bhägavatam. Bhäñyaà brahma-sütränäm:[iii]** the Çrémad-Bhägavatam is the real commentary on the Vedänta-sütra, written by the author of the Vedänta-sütra himself. The Vedänta-sütra was written by Vyäsadeva, and under the instruction of Närada, his spiritual master, Vyäsadeva wrote a commentary on it. That is Çrémad-Bhägavatam.

Çrémad-Bhägavatam begins with the same aphorism as the Vedänta-sütra: janmädy asya yataù [SB 1.1.1], and continues, anvayäd itarataç cärtheñv abhijïaù svarät. So actually, the Vedänta-sütra is explained by the author in Çrémad-Bhägavatam.

But the rascal Mäyävädés—without understanding Vedänta-sütra, and without reading the natural commentary, Çrémad-Bhägavatam—are posing themselves as Vedantists. That means they are misguiding people. And because people are not educated, they're accepting these rascals as Vedantists. Really, the Mäyävädé Vedantists—they are bluffers. They are not Vedantists. They do not know anything of the Vedänta-sütra. That is the difficulty. Actually, what is stated in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam—that is real Vedänta.

 So, if we take Çrémad-Bhägavatam as the real explanation of Vedänta-sütra, then we will understand Vedänta, the end of knowledge. And if we take shelter of the Mäyävädé Vedantists, the bluffers, then we cannot understand Vedänta. People do not know anything, and as a result they can be bluffed and cheated by anyone. Therefore now they should learn from this Kåñëa consciousness movement what Vedänta is and what the explanation of Vedänta-sütra is. Then they will be benefited.

If we accept Çrémad-Bhägavatam as the real commentary on Vedänta-sütra, then we'll find that in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam it is said, kaler doña-nidhe räjann asti hy eko mahän guëaù: "In this Kali-yuga, which is an ocean of faults, there is one benediction, one opportunity." What is that? Kértanäd eva kåñëasya mukta-saìgaù paraà vrajet: "One can become liberated simply by chanting the Hare Kåñëa mantra." This is real Vedänta. And actually, this liberation by chanting Hare Kåñëa is happening. But people want to be misguided. And there are so many bluffers to misguide them. What can be done? Vyäsadeva has already given the perfect explanation of Vedänta-sütra—the Çrémad-Bhägavatam. So let people read the Çrémad-Bhägavatam; then they will understand what Vedänta is.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Then are the conclusion of the Vedänta-sütra and the conclusion of Çrémad-Bhägavatam one and the same—bhakti?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. Find this verse: Kämasya nendriya-prétir…

Puñöa Kåñëa:

kämasya nendriya-prétir
läbho jéveta yävatä
jévasya tattva-jijïäsä
närtho yaç ceha karmabhiù

"Life's desires should never be directed toward sense gratification. One should desire only a healthy life, or self-preservation, since a human being is meant for inquiry about the About Truth. Nothing else should be the goal of one's works." [Çrémad-Bhägavatam 1.2.10]

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. This verse of Çrémad-Bhägavatam proceeds directly from the Vedänta-sütra— athäto brahma jijïäsä: "Now is the time to inquire about the Absolute Truth." Here the very same thing is explained. "Don't be entrapped with these temporary, bodily 'necessities of life'—sense gratification. You must inquire about the Absolute Truth." the next verse of Çrémad-Bhägavatam explains, vadanti tat tattva-vidas tattvaà yaj jïänam advayam: [SB 1.2.11] "Those who know the Absolute Truth describe Him in this way …" Tattva means "truth." The truth is explained by the tattva-vit, one who knows the truth. How? Brahmeti paramätmeti bhagavän iti çabdyate: the Absolute Truth is explained as Brahman, the all-pervading spiritual effulgence; as Paramätmä, the localized Supersoul; or as Bhagavän, the Supreme Lord. Understanding these is what Vedänta-sütra means when it says, athäto brahma jijïäsä: "Now one should learn about the Absolute Truth—what Brahman is, what Paramätmä is, what Bhagavän is. In this way, one should make advancement in his spiritual consciousness."

The Mäyävädé Vedantists follow the impersonal commentary of Çaìkaräcärya, Çäréraka-bhäñya. But there are other commentaries on the Vedänta-sütra. Besides the Çrémad-Bhägavatam, the natural commentary by the author of Vedänta-sütra himself, there are Vedänta-bhäñyas written by Vaiñëava äcäryas such as Rämänujäcärya, Madhväcärya, Viñëu Swami, and Baladeva Vidyäbhüñana. Unfortunately, the Mäyävädé Vedantists do not care to read these Vaiñëava Vedänta-bhäñyas. They simply read Çäréraka-bhäñya and call themselves Vedantists.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Why do the Mäyävädé Vedantists read only one commentary? What is the reason for that?

Çréla Prabhupäda: The reason is that they want to read something that will confirm their illusion that they are God.

the Mäyävädé Vedantists cheat. Suppose I present some proposition. If it is a misconception, generally there are others also who can say something to clarify this misconception. For instance, in a court of law, there are two lawyers. One lawyer is speaking on one point of the law, the other lawyer is speaking on another point of the law. But if the judge listens to one side only, then how will he make a proper judgement? Similarly, the Vedantists are simply reading the Çäréraka-bhäñya. They are not reading other bhäñyas, such as the Çrémad-Bhägavatam, which is the natural commentary. And they are cheating people. That's all.

Now, the Vedänta-sütra says, janmädy asya yataù: [SB 1.1.1] "The Absolute Truth is that from which everything emanates." But this needs some explanation. One may ask, "Is that Absolute Truth personal or impersonal?" Therefore in the Bhagavad-gétä Kåñëa clearly says, ahaà sarvasya prabhavo mattaù sarvaà pravartate: [Bg. 10.8] "I am the origin of everything; everything comes from Me." So why don't you Mäyävädé Vedantists take it? Why do you simply remain stuck at the point that the Absolute Truth is that from which everything emanates? When Kåñëa, the Absolute Truth, comes before you and says, "I am the origin of everything—everything comes from Me," why don't you accept Kåñëa as the Absolute Truth? Why do you take the impersonalist view only, that the Absolute Truth has no form? Here is the Absolute Truth speaking—a person. Why don't you take it?

Of course, if people want to be cheated, then who can stop them? In Bhagavad-gétä Kåñëa also says, vedänta-kåd … eva cäham: "I am the compiler of Vedänta." Why do these rascals not consider who compiled Vedänta? Vyäsadeva is the incarnation of Kåñëa. He compiled Vedänta. Why do these rascals not consider the original Vedantist, Kåñëa? They approach a Mäyävädé instead. So how will they understand Vedänta?

Suppose I have written a book. If you cannot understand something in it, then you should come directly to me for an explanation. That is sensible. Why go to a rascal who has nothing to do with my book? Similary, some rascal Mäyävädé may claim, "I am a Vedantist," but why should I go to a rascal instead of the real compiler of the Vedänta-sütra?

Those who approach the Mäyävädé Vedantists for knowledge are also rascals. They are willingly being cheated. Let the Mäyävädé Vedantists and their followers accept the conclusions of Bhagavad-gétä and Çrémad-Bhägavatam. Then they will understand Vedänta-sütra. They'll be real Vedantists. Otherwise, they will remain cheaters. So if you go to a cheater you'll be cheated, and that is your business.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, are you saying that the Mäyävädés have no knowledge at all?

Çréla Prabhupäda: Once again, Vedänta means "the ultimate knowledge." And what is that knowledge? Kåñëa explains in the Bhagavad-gétä [7.19]: bahünäà janmanäm ante jïänavän mäà prapadyate. "After many births, one who is actually in knowledge at last surrenders unto Me." So unless one surrenders to Kåñëa, there is no jïäna, no knowledge.

Therefore the Mäyävädé Vedantists are all nonsense—they have no knowledge at all. The subject matter of ultimate knowledge, Vedänta, is Kåñëa, God. So if one does not know who God is, who Kåñëa is, and if one does not surrender to Him, then where is the question of knowledge? But if a rascal claims that "I am a man of knowledge," what can be done?

In Bhagavad-gétä Kåñëa goes on to explain: väsudevaù sarvam iti sa mahätmä su-durlabhaù [Bg. 7.19]. "when one understands that Väsudeva, Kåñëa, is everything, then that is knowledge. But such a mahätmä is very rare." Before coming to this understanding, one has no knowledge. His so-called understanding is simply misunderstanding. Brahmeti paramätmeti bhagavän iti çabdyate: one may begin with understanding impersonal Brahman by the speculative method; then, in the secondary stage, one can understand the Paramätmä, the Lord's localized aspect; and the final stage is to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kåñëa. Vedaiç ca sarvair aham eva vedyam: [Bg. 15.15] by all the Vedas, Kåñëa is to be known. That is the ultimate knowledge. But if you do not understand Kåñëa, then where is your knowledge? Half-way knowledge is not knowledge. It must be complete knowledge.

That complete knowledge is possible, as it is said in the Bhagavad-gétä, bahünäà janmanäm ante [Bg. 7.19]—after many births. Those who are striving to acquire knowledge—after many, many births, when actually by the grace of God and by the grace of a devotee they come to knowledge, then such persons agree, "Oh, väsudevaù sarvam iti: [Bg. 7.19] Kåñëa is everything." Sa mahätmä sudurlabhaù: that mahätmä, that great soul, is very rarely to be found. Durlabhaù means "very rarely found," but the word used is sudurlabhaù—"very, very rarely to be found." So you cannot easily find such a mahätmä who clearly understands Kåñëa.

CAT 7: GETTING SPIRITUAL GUIDANCE

Puñöa Kåñëa: May I ask another question, Çréla Prabhupäda? "Is a guru essential for one to enter the spiritual path and attain the goal, and how does one recognize one's guru?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes, a guru is necessary. In the Bhagavad-gétä, when Kåñëa and Arjuna were talking as friends, there was no conclusion. So Arjuna decided to accept Kåñëa as his guru. Find this verse in Bhagavad-gétä: kärpaëya-doñopahata svabhävaù.

Hari-sauri:

kärpaëya-doñopahata svabhävaù
påcchämi tvaà dharma-sammüòha-cetäù
yac chreyaù syän niçcitaà brühi tan me
çiñyas te 'haà çädhi mäà tväà prapannam

"[Arjuna said:] Now I am confused about my duty and have lost all composure because of miserly weakness. In this condition I am asking You to tell me for certain what is best for me. Now I am Your disciple, and a soul surrendered unto You. Please instruct me." [Bg. 2.7]

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. So a guru is necessary. Like Arjuna, everyone is perplexed about his best course of action. Nobody can decide by himself. Even a physician—when he is sick he does not devise his own treatment. He calls for another physician, because his brain is not in order. How can he prescribe the right medicine for himself?

similarly, when we are perplexed and cannot find any solution, at that time the guru is required. It is therefore essential for everyone to surrender to a guru, since in our present existence we are all perplexed. Arjuna is representing the perplexed position of the materialistic person. So under the circumstances, a guru is required to give us real direction.

Now, Arjuna selected Kåñëa as his guru. He did not go to anyone else, because he knew, "I can't find any other means to pacify me. You are the only one." The purport is that like Arjuna, we should also accept Kåñëa as the guru who can intruct us in how to get relief from our perplexed position. So Kåñëa is the guru not only for Arjuna, but for everyone.

If we take instruction from Kåñëa and abide by that instruction, then our life is successful. Conveying that fact is our mission. This Kåñëa consciousness movement teaches, "Accept Kåñëa as your guru. Don't divert your attention." We don't say, "I am Kåñëa; follow my order." We never say that. We simply ask people, "Please abide by the order of Kåñëa." Kåñëa says, sarva-dharmän parityajya mäm ekaà çaraëaà vraja [Bg. 18.66], and we say the same thing: "Give up all other ideas of so-called dharma and surrender to Kåñëa." The same thing. we don't say of ourselves, "I am the authority." No, we say, "Kåñëa is the authority, and you should surrender to His instruction and try to understand Him." This is the Kåñëa consciousness movement.

Now, one may say, "Kåñëa is no longer present, so how can I surrender to Him?" Kåñëa is no longer present? How can you say that? Kåñëa's instruction is there—Bhagavad-gétä. How can you say that Kåñëa is not present? Kåñëa, being absolute, is not different from His words. The words of Kåñëa and Kåñëa Himself—they are the same. That is the meaning of Absolute Truth.

In the relative world, the word water and the substance water are different. When I am thirsty, if I simply chant "Water, water, water," my thirst will not be satisfied. I require the real water. That is the nature of the relative world and relative consciousness. But in the spiritual world or spiritual consciousness, the name is the same as the thing that is named. For instance, we are chanting Hare Kåñëa. If Kåñëa were different from the chanting of Hare Kåñëa, then how could we be satisfied chanting the whole day and night? This is the proof. An ordinary name—if you chant "Mr. John, Mr. John," after chanting three times you'll cease. But this Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra—if you go on chanting twenty-four hours a day, you'll never become tired. This is the spiritual nature of the Absolute Truth. This is practical. Anyone can perceive it.

So Kåñëa is present through His words and through His representati Therefore we advise everyone to accept Kåñëa's instructions in Bhagavad-gétä and to surrender to His bona fide representati You have to accept a guru, so why go to a pseudo guru, who will mislead you? Why not take instructions from a real guru? Now you are in doubt about whether a guru is needed. Yes, a guru is needed, but you have to go to a real guru. That is the instruction given by Kåñëa in the Bhagavad-gétä. Just find this

tad viddhi praëipätena
paripraçnena sevayä
upadekñyanti tad-jïänaà
jïäninas tattva-darçinaù

Puñöa Kåñëa: "Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master. Inquire from him submissively and render service unto him. The self-realized soul can impart knowledge unto you because he has seen the truth." [Bhagavad-gétä 4.34]

Çréla Prabhupäda: So this is the real guru—one who has seen the truth, just as Arjuna has seen Kåñëa. Arjuna heard Kåñëa's instructions and said, "You are the Absolute Truth." Now, if you take the instruction of Arjuna, then you will understand the Absolute Truth. So what is the instruction of Arjuna? Find out in the tenth chapter.

Puñöa Kåñëa:

arjuna uväca
paraà brahma paraà dhäma
pavitraà paramaà bhavän
puruñaà çäçvataà divyam
ädi-devam ajaà vibhum

"Arjuna said, 'You are the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the ultimate abode, the purest, the Absolute Truth. You are the eternal, transcendental, original person, the unborn, the greatest.'" [Bhagavad-gétä 10.12]

Çréla Prabhupäda: And the Vedänta-sütra says, athäto brahma jijïäsä: "Now, in the human form of life, is the time to inquire into what is the Supreme Brahman." So here in Bhagavad-gétä Arjuna has realized, "O Kåñëa, You are the Supreme Brahman," So you should make Arjuna your guru and Kåñëa your guru. Arjuna is the representative of Kåñëa, the friend of Kåñëa. The guru is essential. But why go to a bogus guru? You will be cheated. For instance, when you are diseased, for your treatment you need to go to a physician. But you want to go to a real physician, not a cheater who has no knowledge of medical science and misrepresents himself—"I am a physician, an M.D." Then you'll be cheated. The guru is necessary; that's a fact. But go to the real guru. Who is the real guru? The real guru is Kåñëa or one who has seen Kåñëa, such as Arjuna.

CAT 8: CIVILIZATION MEANS REGULATION

Puñöa Kåñëa: May I ask the next question, Çréla Prabhupäda? "Are fasting and other dietary regulations necessary for leading a spiritual life?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: Certainly. For advancement in spiritual life, such tapasya is essential. Tapasya means voluntarily accepting something which may be painful. For instance, we are recommending no illicit sex, no intoxication, no gambling, no meat-eating. So those who are accustomed to these bad habits—for them, in the beginning it may be a little difficult. But in spite of this difficulty, one has to do it. That is tapasya. To rise early in the morning—for those who are not practiced, it is a little painful, but one has to do it. So according to the Vedic injunctions, there are some tapasyas that must be done.

It is not "I may do it or not do it." These austerities must be done. For example, in the Muëòaka Upaniñad it is ordered that if one wants to become self-realized, one must approach a spiritual master: tad-vijïänärthaà sa gurum eväbhigacchet [MU [iv]1.2.12]. So there is no question of "optional"; it must be done. And one must carry out the order of the spiritual master and the order of the çästra, or scripture. When you follow without consideration of whether it is convenient or inconvenient, simply because it must be done, that is called tapasya. Tapo divyam: like other great spiritual authorities, Rsabhadeva orders that this human life is meant for austerity aimed toward realizing God. Therefore in our Vedic civilization we find so many rules and regulations.

At the very beginning of life one must be a brahmacäré. He must go to the spiritual master's place and act like a menial servant. If the spiritual master says "go and pick up some wood from the forest," one may be a king's son, but he cannot refuse the spiritual master's order. He must go. Even Kåñëa was ordered by His spiritual master to go and pick up some dry wood from the forest. So He had to go. Although His father was Nanda Mahäräja, a village vaiçya king, and although Kåñëa was the Personality of Godhead Himself, still He could not refuse. He had to go. Nicavat—just like a menial servant. This is brahmäcärya, spiritual student life. This is tapasya. Tapasya is so essential that one has to do it. There is no question of an alternati

After brahmacäré life, one may marry. This means he enters gåhastha life, household life. That is also tapasya. He cannot have sex whenever he likes. No. The çästra says, "You must have sex like this: once in a month and only for begetting children." So that is also tapasya.

People do not follow any tapasya at the present moment, but human life is meant for tapasya—regulative principles. Even in ordinary affairs—let us say you are driving your car on some urgent business, and you see a red light. You have to stop. You cannot say, "I have to be there in a few minutes. I must go." No. You must stop. That is tapasya.

So tapasya means following the regulative principles strictly, according to the higher order. and that is human life.

Animal life, however, means you can do whatever you like. On the road, animals may keep to the right or keep to the left; it doesn't matter. Their irregularity is not taken as an offense, because they are animals. But if a human being does not follow the regulative principles, he is sinful. He'll be punished. Consider the same example: When there is a red light, if you do not stop you'll be punished. But if a cat or dog transgresses—"Never mind the red light; I shall go"—he's not punished. So tapasya is meant for the human being. He must do it if he at all wants to make progress in life. It is essential.

Puñöa Kåñëa: And so, Çréla Prabhupäda, tapasya includes dietary regulations?

Çréla Prabhupäda: That is also tapasya. For example, we prohibit meat-eating. So in your country this is a little troublesome. From the very beginning of life, a child is habituated to eating meat. the mother purchases powdered meat and mixes it with liquid and feeds it to the infant. I have seen it. So practically everyone has been brought up eating meat. yet I say, "Don't eat meat." Therefore that is troublesome. But if one is serious about becoming self-realized, one must accept the order. That is tapasya.

Tapasya applies to diet, to personal behavior, to dealings with others, and so on and so forth. In every aspect of life, there is tapasya. That is all described in the Bhagavad-gétä. Mental tapasya. Bodily tapasya. Verbal tapasya—controlling vaco-vegam, the urge to talk loosely or whimsically. You cannot talk nonsense. If you talk, you must talk about Kåñëa. That is tapasya. There is also tapasya in connection with krodha-vegam, the urge to express one's anger. If one becomes angry and wants to express it by beating someone or doing something very violent, tapasya will restrict him—"No, don't do it." There is also tapasya with regards to the tongue, belly, and genitals. One cannot eat anything and everything, or at any time he pleases. Nor can one have sex freely, but only according to the scriptural injunctions. "I am sexually inclined, but I cannot do it. This is not the time." That is tapasya.

So one should practice tapasya in every way—in body, mind, words, personal behavior, and dealings with others. That is human life. Tapo divyam: if you want to simply be a human being, and especially if you want to make progress in spiritual life, you must act according to the sastric injunctions. That means tapasya. Before Brahma could take part in creation, he had to undergo tapasya. Is it not stated in the çästra? Yes. So tapasya is essential. You cannot avoid it.

And what is the aim of performing tapasya? The aim is to please the Supreme Lord through the spiritual master. Yasya prasädäd bhagavat-prasädo: ** "One can attain the mercy of the Lord only by attaining the mercy of the spiritual master." This is the idea.

Now, in today's educational institutions, who is teaching this tapasya? Where is the school or college? The students are even smoking in front of their teacher, and it is tolerated. No offense. What can you expect from such students? This is an animal civilization. This is not human civilization. No tapasya, no brahmacäré life. Real civilization means tapo divyam, godly austerity. And this tapasya begins with brahmacäré life, learning to control the senses—that is the beginning of life. Not "A-B-C-D" learning, and maybe your character is less than an animal's, though you have a degree from the university. "Never mind. You have become a learned man." No—that is not accepted.

Even from the standpoint of basic moral instruction, we must ask, Who today is educated? The educated person is described by Cäëakya Paëòita:

mätå-vat para-däreñu
para-dravyeñu loñöra-vat
ätma-vat sarva-bhüteñu
yaù paçyati sa paëòitäù

"The educated man sees another's wife as his mother and another's property as untouchable garbage, and he sees all others as equal to himself."

That is the paëòita, the learned man. In Bhagavad-gétä [5.18] Kåñëa also describes the paëòita:

vidyä-vinaya-sampanne
brähmaëe gavi hastini
çuni caiva çva-päke ca
paëòitäù sama-darçinaù

"The humble sage, by virtue of true knowledge, sees with equal vision a learned and gentle brähmaëa, a cow, an elephant, a dog, and a dog-eater." That is a learned man. Not this degree-holder. A degree-holder who has no tapasya and no character—Kåñëa says he is mäyayäpahåta-jïänä, "his knowledge is stolen by illusion." Although he has learned so many things, nonetheless, mäyä has taken away his knowledge. He's a rascal. He's an animal. This is the perspective of Vedic civilization.

CAT 9: CLEANSING THE HEART

Puñöa Kåñëa: Next question, Çréla Prabhupäda? "What is the role of rituals in religion? Are they to be discouraged, as is being advocated by some reformists, or are they to be encouraged? If so, in what form?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: A ritual is a practice based on tapasya, or austerity. Generally, unless one undergoes the ritualistic ceremonies for purification, he remains unclean. But in this age, because it is practically impossible to induce people to take up all these ritualistic processes, both the scripture and Caitanya Mahäprabhu recommend, "Chant the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra." This is the special advantage of this age—that by constant chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra, one automatically becomes purified.

In His Çikñäñöaka, Lord Caitanya describes the progressive benefits of chanting Hare Kåñëa. First, ceto-darpaëa-märjanam [Cc. Antya 20.12]. The beginning is cleansing the heart, because we are impure on account of dirty things within our heart, accumulated lifetime after lifetime in the animalistic way of life. So everything—advancement of spiritual life, culture, tapasya—is meant to cleanse the heart. And in this process of chanting the mahä-mantra, the first installment of benefit is the cleansing of the heart. Ceto-darpaëa-märjanam.

And when the heart is cleansed, then a person becomes eligible for being freed from the clutches of mäyä, or the materialistic way of life. He understands that he is not this body—that he's a spirit soul, and that his business is therefore different from merely material concerns. He thinks, "Now I am engaged only in seeking these bodily comforts of life. These are not at all essential, because my body will change. Today, since I am in an American body, I think I have so many duties as an American man. Tomorrow I may be in an American dog body, and immediately my duty would change. So I can understand that these bodily concerns are not my real business. My real business is how to elevate myself—as a spirit soul—to the spiritual world, back to home, back to Godhead."

In this way the person who chants Hare Kåñëa purifies his consciousness. Then his materialistic activity is stopped. He knows, "This is simply a waste of time. I must act spiritually." That is knowledge, which comes from cleansing the heart (ceto-darpaëa-märjanam [Cc. Antya 20.12]). The illusion of wrongly working on the basis of the bodily concept of life is overcome simply by the chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra. This is the first installment of benefit from chanting.

And then there is bhava-mahä-dävägni-nirväpaëam: the process of stopping the blazing fire of material existence. Next, çreyaù-kairava-candrikä-vitaraëam: his life becomes completely auspcious; and vidyä-vadhü-jévanam: he becomes filled with transcendental knowledge. The next benefit is änandämbudhi-vardanam: the ocean of transcendental bliss increases; and pürëämåtäsvädanam: he tastes the nectar of Kåñëa consciousess at every step of life. In other words, his life becomes totally blissful. Finally, sarvätma-snapanaà paraà vijäyate çré-kåñëa-saìkértanam: all glories to this saìkértana movement, the chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra!

So this saìkértana movement is Caitanya Mahäprabhu's gift, and by taking up this chanting one attains kevala-bhakti, unalloyed devotion to the Lord. All the benefits of practicing austerities, penances, mystic yoga, and so on will be totally achieved simply by the chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mantra. This is stated in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam [6.1.15]:

kecit kevalayä bhaktyä
väsudeva-paräyaëäù
aghaà dhunvanti kärtsnyena
néhäram iva bhäskaraù

Just as when the sun rises the all-pervading fog immediately disappears, so in this Kali-yuga, by the process of bhakti-yoga—especially by chanting the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra—all one's sins are eradicated and one becomes fully reformed. In other words, one comes to the spiritual platform, and that is success in life.

CAT 10: THE PROCESS OF PURIFICATION

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, the next question somewhat echoes the previous one: "There are various saàskäras, or purificatory ceremonies, prescribed for every civilized person, from birth to death. Many of these saàskäras are not being observed today. Should they be revived?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The real aim of saàskäras is to bring a rascal to the platform of knowledge. Janmanä jäyate çüdraù: by birth, everyone is the same—çüdra. In other words, one is without any knowledge. So the purpose of saàskäras is to gradually bring a person who has no knowledge of spiritual life to the spiritual platform. As it is said, saàskäräd bhaved dvijaù: by the purificatory processes, one attains spiritual rebirth. That is essential.

Human life is the opportunity for understanding what one is and what the aim of one's life is. The aim of life is to go back home, back to Godhead. After all, we are part and parcel of God. Somehow or other, we are now in this material existence. So the real aim of life is to return to the spiritual world, where there is no struggle for existence—blissful, happy life. we want unending blissful life, but it is not possible in the material world That happiness is in the spiritual world. So our aim should be to go there, and every human being should be given the chance. That is real education. That is called saàskära, the process of purification.

Now, altogether there are daça-vidha-saàskärah, ten kinds of purificatory processes. So, in this age it is very difficult to follow them. but if one chants the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra without any offense, under the guidance of a spiritual master, all these saàskäras automatically become fulfilled, and one returns to his original, spiritual position.

Ahaà brahmäsmi—"I am a spirit soul." So, we are Brahman, spirit, and Kåñëa is Param Brahman, the Supreme Spirit. As Arjuna said, paraà brahma paraà dhäma pavitraà paramaà bhavän: [Bg. 10.12] "You are the Supreme Spirit, the ultimate abode, the purest, the Absolute Truth." Kåñëa is Brahman, or spirit, and I am also Brahman, but He's the Supreme Brahman, while I am minute Brahman. So my business is to serve Kåñëa. That is the teaching of Lord Caitanya: jévera 'svarüpa' haya kåñëera 'nitya-däsa' [Cc. Madhya 20.108]—"The real identity of the living being is that he is the eternal servant of Kåñëa." So if one engages himself in his original, spiritual business, acting as the servant of Kåñëa, then all processes of purification and reformation are fulfilled.

And that advantage of re-engagement in our original, spiritual business is given freely in this age: kértanäd eva kåñëasya mukta-saìgaù paraà vrajet—"Simply by chanting the Lord's holy name, one achieves spiritual liberation." The reformatory processes, or saàskäras, are meant for purifying a person so that he becomes mukta-saìgaù, liberated from all the bad association of material existence and eligible to go back home, back to Godhead. So this is the special advantage of chanting the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra.

The question was, "Should purificatory processes be revived?" They should be revived as far as necessary, but all of them cannot be revived in this age. So people should take to the chanting of the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra. Then all reformation will be there, and people will come to the spiritual platform—brahma-bhütaù, the realization of Brahman. Then prasannätmä: they'll be happy. Na çocati na käìkñati: there will be no lamentation or needless hankering. Samaù sarveñu bhüteñu: they will see everyone on the spiritual platform. And finally, mad-bhaktià labhate param [Bg. 18.54]. In this way they will come to the platform of devotional service, and then their life becomes successful. Is that question answered or not?

Puñöa Kåñëa: Yes. Just one question I have, Çréla Prabhupäda. You said that the saàskäras should be revived as far as necessary?

Çréla Prabhupäda: The essentials. For instance, to make one a brähmaëa, these four things are essential: no illicit sex, no meat-eating, no intoxication, no gambling. These essentials must be there; you cannot dispense with them. You must at least avoid sinful activities. Then one can practice Kåñëa consciousness. As Kåñëa says in the Bhagavad-gétä [7.28]:

yeñäà tv anta-gataà päpaà
janänäà puëya-karmaëäm
te dvandva-moha-nirmuktä
bhajante mäà dåòha-vratäù

"Persons who have acted piously in previous lives and in this life and whose sinful actions are completely eradicated are freed from the dualities of delusion, and they engage themselves in My service with determination."

You cannot become a devotee unless you give up sinful activity. Therefore you have to begin by following these four prohibitions. You have to avoid sinful activities like illicit sex, meat-eating, gambling, and intoxication, including tobacco, coffee, and tea. Then you'll gradually become completely sinless. On one side you have to follow restrictions, and on the other side you have to engage yourself in devotional service. To engage oneself in devotional service under the order of the spiritual master and the çästra is the way to remain on the transcendental platform.

The transcendental platform means there is no sinful activity. It is above any question of "sinful." "Pious" and "sinful" activities are there only as long as you are on the material platform. "Good" and "bad," "pious" and "sinful"—these are all considerations on the material platform. But when you are on the transcendental platform, you are automatically without sin. Kåñëa confirms this in Bhagavad-gétä [14.26]:

mäà ca yo' vyabhicäreëa
bhakti-yogena sevate
sa guëän samatétyaitän
brahma-bhüyäya kalpate

The life of vice and the life of piety are within this material world, but when one is spiritually engaged, he is above the material plane, on the spiritual plane.

So the whole thing is that if you chant the Hare Kåñëa mahä-mantra and give up these sinful activities, automatically you become reformed. You come to the spiritual platform. And in this way your life will become successful.

CAT 11: "FEEL THE ONENESS" … WITH A DIFFERENCE

Puñöa Kåñëa: This next question is rather interesting, Çréla Prabhupäda. "Is it not possible for all kinds of spiritualists—be they Advaitans [advocates of oneness of the self with God], Dvaitans [advocates of total difference between the self and God], or Viñiñöädvaitans [advocates of qualified oneness of the self with God]—come together instead of remaining isolated as warring factions?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes. This is the process taught by Caitanya Mahäprabhu—to bring all the Dvaitans and Advaitans together on one platform. Everyone has to understand that he is essentially a servant of God. The Advaitan wrongly thinks that he is absolutely one with God, that he himself is God. That is wrong. How can you become God? God is ñaò-aiçvarya-pürëam, full in six opulences. He has all power, all wealth, all beauty, all fame, all knowledge, and all renunciation. So this Advaitan idea is artificial—to think you're able to become God.

The Dvaitans stress that one is utterly different from God, that God is separate from the living entity. But actually, from the Bhagavad-gétä we understand that the living entities are part and parcel of God. And in the Vedas it is said, nityo nityänäà cetanaç cetanänäm: both God and His creatures are living entities, though God is the chief. Eko yo bahünäà vidadhäti kämän: the difference between the two is that God maintains all the other living entities. That is a fact. We are maintained, and God is the maintainer. We are predominated—we are not independent—and God is the predominator. But because the predominated living entities are part and parcel of God, in quality they are one with God.

So Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu's philosophy is acintya-bhedäbheda: the living entities are simultaneously one with and different from the Lord. The living entity is one in the sense that he is part and parcel of God. So if God were gold, the living entity would also be gold. That is oneness in quality. But God is great, and we are minute. In that way we are different. That is why Caitanya Mahäprabhu enunciated this philosophy of acintya-bhedäbheda: inconceivable, simultaneous oneness with and difference from God. That is real philosophy.

So on the platform of this philosophy, everyone can come together, if they are reasonable. If they remain unreasonably stuck up in their own concocted philosophy, then it is difficult. But it is a fact that the living entity is eternally one with and different from God. Find this verse: mamaiväàço jéva-loke.

Hari-sauri:

mamaiväàço jéva-loke
jéva-bhütaù sanätanaù
manaù ñañöhänéndriyäëi
prakåti-sthäni karñati

"The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal fragmental parts. Due to conditioned life, they are struggling very hard with the six senses, which include the mind." [Bg. 15.7]

Çréla Prabhupäda: So if the living entity is eternally a fragmental part, how can he become one with the whole? The part is never equal to the whole. That is an axiomatic truth. So it is a wrong conception to try to become equal to God. The Mäyävädés are trying to become God, but that is impossible. Let them try to become godly. Godly means "servant of God." That will make them perfect. The Vaiñëava philosophy teaches that we can remain in our natural position but act as a servant of God. That is perfect. But if the servant tries to become the master, that is artificial.

Of course, in the spiritual world there often seems to be no difference between the master and the servant. For instance, Kåñëa's friends the cowherd boys—they do not know that Kåñëa is God. They play with Him on equal terms. When Kåñëa is defeated in play, He has to take His friend on His shoulder and carry him. The friends do not know who is God and who is not God. So that is the advanced spiritual conception. Of course, the difference is always there between God and the part-and-parcel living entities, but by the influence of God's internal potency, the understanding is covered. We can attain that position after many, many lives of pious activities. That is stated in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam [10.12.11]:

itthaà satäà brahma-sukhänubhütyä
däsyaà gatänäà para-daivatena
mäyäçritänäà nara-därakeëa
säkaà vijahruù kåta-puëya-puïjäù

The cowherd boys are playing with Kåñëa. And who is Kåñëa? He is the essence of brahma-sukha, spiritual bliss. He is Param Brahman, the Supreme Spirit. So the boys are playing with Param Brahman, though to an ordinary man He appears to be an ordinary child. how have the cowherd boys gotten the position of being able to play with Kåñëa? Kåta-puëya-puïjäù: After many, many lives of pious activities, they have gotten the position of playing with Kåñëa on equal terms.

So this is the conception of pure devotional service—that when you go to Goloka Våndävana, Kåñëa's abode, you love Kåñëa so much that you will not distinguish between the Supreme Lord and His subordinates. The inhabitants of Kåñëa's abode have such unflinching love for Kåñëa. That is Våndävana life. The cows, the calves, the trees, the flowers, the water, the elderly men, Kåñëa's parents Nanda Mahäräja and Yaçodämayé—everyone is intensely attached to Kåñëa. Everyone's central point is Kåñëa. Everyone is loving Kåñëa so much that they do not know He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Sometimes the residents of Våndävana see Kåñëa's wonderful activities and think, "Kåñëa must be some demigod who has come here." They never recognize that Kåñëa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead—or if they do, Kåñëa makes them immediately forget. When Kåñëa manifested His pastimes on earth some five thousands years ago, He passed through many dangerous situations—so many demons were coming—and mother Yaçodä would chant mantras to protect Kåñëa, thinking, "He may not be put into some calamity." Kåñëa's family and friends never understood that Kåñëa is God. Their natural love for Kåñëa was so intense. Therefore Våndävana life is so exalted. As Caitanya Mahäprabhu taught, ärädhyo bhagavän vrajeña-tanayas tad-dhäma våndävanam: First of all, Kåñëa—Vrajendra-nandana, the son of Nanda Mahäräja—is ärädhya, worshipable. Then, tad-dhäma våndävanam: His dhäma, or abode—Våndävana—is equally worshipable.

So these facts pertain to a higher standard of understanding. Only a devotee can understand that to become one with God is not a sublime idea. In Våndävana the devotees want to become the father or mother of God—to control God with love. This fact the Mäyävädés, or Advaitavädés, cannot understand. Only pure devotees can understand these things. What is the benefit of becoming one with God?

Even other Vaiñëava philosophies cannot explain the higher relationships with God, which Caitanya Mahäprabhu explained. These are vatsalya-rasa [parenthood], and madhurya-rasa [conjugal love]. Caitanya Mahäprabhu especially taught that our relationship with Kåñëa can be in conjugal love, madhurya-rasa.

But as for our general understanding, Lord Caitanya introduced the philosophy of acintya-bhedäbheda—simultaneously one with and different from the Lord. That is explained by Kåñëa in Bhagavad-gétä [15.7]: mamaiväàço … jéva-bhütaù—the living entities are part and parcel of God. So we are one with God, since we have God's qualities in minute degree. But God is the master, and we are always subordinate. Eko bahünäà yo vidadhäti kämän: we are protected, we are maintained, we are predominated. That is our position. We cannot attain the position of predominator. That is not possible.

CAT 12: HOW TO LOVE GOD

Puñöa Kåñëa: Next question, Çréla Prabhupäda. "As the world is coming to be divided into just two classes—atheist and theist—is it not advisable for all religions to come together? And what positive steps can be taken in this direction?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: The steps to be taken have already been explained—this Kåñëa consciousness movement. The atheist class and the theist class will always exist. This is the nature of the material world. Even at home—the father may be an atheist like Hiraëyakaçipu, and the son a theist like Prahläda. So atheists and theists will always exist—in the family, in the community, in the nation.

But the theists should follow the instructions of the Bhagavad-gétä and take shelter at Kåñëa's lotus feet, giving up other, so-called religious principles. That will bring religious unity. Religion without a clear conception of God is humbug, bogus. Religion means to accept the order of God. So if you have no clear conception of God, if you do not know who God is, there is no question of accepting His order. Find this verse in the Sixth Canto of

Çrémad-Bhägavatam: dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam [SB 6.3.19].

Hari-sauri:

dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam
na vai vidur åñayo näpi deväù
na siddha-mukhyä asurä manuñyäù
kuto nu vidyädhara-cäraëädayaù
 [SB 6.3.19]

"Real religious principles are enacted by . . ."

Çréla Prabhupäda: Ah. "Real." Go on.

Hari-sauri: "Real religious principles are enacted by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Although fully situated in the mode of goodness, even the great sages who occupy the topmost planets cannot ascertain the real religious principles, nor can the demigods or the leaders of Siddhaloka, to say nothing of the demons, ordinary human beings, Vidyädharas, and Cäraëas." [Bhäg. 6.3.19]

Çréla Prabhupäda: Hm. Read the next verses also.

Hari-sauri:

svayambhür näradaù çaàbhuù
kumäraù kapilo manuù
prahlädo janako bhéñmo
balir vaiyäsakir vayam
 [SB 6.3.20]

dvädaçaite vijänémo
dharmaà bhägavataà bhaöäù
guhyaà viçuddhaà durbodhaà
yaj jïätvämåtam açnute

"Lord Brahmä, Bhagavän Närada, Lord Çiva, the four Kumäras, Lord Kapila [the son of Devahüti], Svayämbhuva Manu, Prahläda Mahäräja, Janaka Mahäräja, Bhéñmadeva, Bali Mahäräja, Çukadeva Gosvämé, and I myself [Yamaräja] know the real religious principle. My dear servants, this transcendental religious principle, which is known as bhägavata-dharma, or surrender unto the Supreme Lord and love for Him, is uncontaminated by the material modes of nature. This transcendental religious principle is very confidential and difficult for ordinary human beings to understand, but if by chance one fortunately understands it, he is immediately liberated, and thus he returns home, back to Godhead."

Çréla Prabhupäda: So these mahäjanas—Brahmä, Närada, Lord Çiva, and so on—they know what the principles of religion are. Religion means bhägavata-dharma, understanding God and our relationship with God. That is religion. You may call it "Hindu religion" or "Muslim religion" or "Christian religion," but in any case, real religion is that which teaches how to love God. Sa vai puàsäà paro dharmo yato bhaktir adhokñaje: [SB 1.2.6] if by following some religious system you come to the platform of loving God, then your religious system is perfect. Otherwise, it is simply a waste of time—bogus religion, without a clear conception of God. So we have to understand what God is and what He says, and we have to abide by His orders. Then there is real religion, there is real understanding of God, and everything is complete.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, one may ask why someone like Christ or Moses is not mentioned among the mahäjanas.

Çréla Prabhupäda: There are mahäjanas among the Christian saints. They include Christ, and in addition to Christ, so many others—St. Matthew, St. Thomas, and so forth. These mahäjanas are mentioned in the Bible. A mahäjana is one who strictly follows the original religion and knows things as they are. And that means he must be coming in the paramparä, the system of disciplic succession.

For instance, Arjuna learned Bhagavad-gétä directly from Kåñëa. Therefore Arjuna is a mahäjana. So you should learn from Arjuna. You follow the way Arjuna acted and the way Arjuna understood Kåñëa. Then mahäjano yena gataù sa panthäù: you are following the mahäjana—you are on the real path. Just as we are.

in these verses from Çrémad-Bhägavatam is a list of mahäjanas, including Sväyambhu, or Lord Brahmä. So this sampradäya of ours is called the Brahma-sampradäya. Our sampradäya also includes Närada, another mahäjana. Sambhu, or Lord Siva, is still another mahäjana. He has his own sampradäya, the Rudra-sampradäya. And similarly, Lakñmé, the goddess of fortune, has the Çré-sampradäya.

So we must belong to one these sampradäyas. Sampradäya-vihinä ye manträs te niñphalä matäù: if you do not belong to a bona fide sampradäya, originating from a mahäjana, then your religious process is useless. You cannot concoct some religious system. So whether you follow the Christian mahäjanas or the Vedic mahäjanas, it doesn't matter. But you have to follow the mahäjanas. If a Christian says, "I don't believe in St. Thomas," what kind of Christian is he? It doesn't matter which mahäjana we are discussing. The real mahäjana is he who is strictly following the principles enunciated by God. Then he is following a real religious system. Otherwise, there is no question of religion. The so-called follower is simply a mano-dharmé, a mental speculator. Mental speculation is not religion. Religion is the order of God, and one who follows that order—he is religious. That's all.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Then as far as I can understand, Çréla Prabhupäda, you're saying that there's no need to maintain sectarian labels, that there's one religion in the world.

Çréla Prabhupäda: One religion exists already: how to love God. This is the one religion. Will the Christians say, "No, we don't want to love God"? Will the Muhammadans say, "No, no, we don't want to love God"? So religion means how to love God, and any religion which teaches how to love God—that is perfect. It doesn't matter whether you are Christian or Muslim or Hindu.

Dharmaà tu säkñäd bhagavat-praëétam: [SB 6.3.19] "Real religion is directly enunciated by Bhagavän, the Supreme Personality of Godhead." So, Bhagavän, Lord Kåñëa, says, "surrender unto Me." Of course, you cannot surrender until you love. For instance, you are surrendered to me. Even though I am not from your country, because you have love for me, you surrender. If I say, "do this," you'll do it. Why? Because you love me. So when will there be surrender to God? When one loves God—when one reaches the platform where he thinks, "O Lord, I love You; I can sacrifice everything for You." That is the basic principle of religion.

Therefore, that religion is perfect which teaches its followers how to love God. So let everyone come to this platform of loving God. That is Kåñëa consciousness. We are teaching nothing but how to love God, how to sacrifice everything for God. That is real religion. Otherwise, it is all a bogus waste of time, simply a following of ritualistic ceremonies. That is not religion. That is superfluous. As stated in the Çrémad-Bhägavatam [1.2.8],

dharmaù svanuñöhitaù puàsäà
viñvaksena kathäsu yaù
notpädayed yadi ratià
çrama eva hi kevalam

"You are very good; you are following your religious principles very strictly. That's all right—but what about your love of God?" "Oh, that I do not know." So, the Bhägavatam says, çrama eva hi kevalam: "Your religion is simply a waste of time—simply laboring. That's all. If you have not learned how to love God, then what is the meaning of your religion?"

But when you're actually on the platform of love of God, you understand your relationship with God: "I am part and parcel of God—and this dog is also part and parcel of God. And so is every other living entity." Then you'll extend your love to the animals also. If you actually love God, then your love for insects is also there, because you understand, "This insect has got a different kind of body, but he is also part and parcel of God—he is my brother." Samaù sarveñu bhüteñu: you look upon all living beings equally. Then you cannot maintain slaughterhouses. If you maintain slaughterhouses and disobey the order of Christ in the Bible—"Thou shall not kill"—and you proclaim yourself a Christian, your so-called religion is simply a waste of time. Çrama eva hi kevalam: your going to the church and everything is simply a waste of time, because you have no love for God. That foolishness is going on all over the world. People are stamping themselves with some sectarian label, but there is no real religion.

So if all people are to come together on one platform, they have to accept the principles of Bhagavad-gétä. The first principle is that Kåñëa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If you do not accept in the beginning that Kåñëa is the Supreme Lord, then try to understand this gradually. That is education. You can begin by accepting that there is somebody who is supreme.

Now, if I say, "Kåñëa is the Supreme Lord," you may say, "Why is Kåñëa the Supreme Lord? Kåñëa is Indian." No. He is God. For example, the sun rises first over India, then over Europe. But that does not mean the European sun is different from the Indian sun. Similarly, although Kåñëa appeared in India, now He has come to the Western countries through this Kåñëa consciousness movement.

So you should try to understand whether Kåñëa is God or not. But He is God. There is no doubt about it. If you have the intelligence to understand what God is, then try to understand. But Kåñëa is God, undoubtedly. So take to Kåñëa consciousness and abide by the order of Kåñëa. Then everyone can come together on the same religious platform. One religion, Kåñëa consciousness.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, sometimes in our preaching activities we meet people who claim to be very devout Christians or Muslims but at the same time blaspheme Kåñëa. Is it possible that such persons can actually be associates of God?

Çréla Prabhupäda: No. If one is serious about understanding what God is, then he will accept Kåñëa as the Supreme Lord. Once he knows what God is, he'll understand, "Here is God—Kåñëa." If he remains in darkness and does not learn what God is, then how will he understand Kåñëa? He'll understand Kåñëa as one of us. That's all. But if he knows what God is, then he'll understand about Kåñëa: "Yes, here is God."

For instance, if a person knows what gold is, then anywhere he comes upon gold, he'll understand, "Here is gold." He won't think gold is available in one shop only. And if a person knows what God is, what the meaning of "God" is, then in Kåñëa he will find God in fullness. Kåñëas tu bhagavän svayam: "Kåñëa Himself is the Supreme Personality of Godhead." The çästra explains what Bhagavän, or God, is, and how Kåñëa is Bhagavän. You should understand and see from the activities of Kåñëa whether He is or is not Bhagavän. It requires a good brain to understand. If I say, "Here is God," now it is up to you to test my statement. If you know what God is, then test my statement about Kåñëa, and then you'll accept Him as God. If you do not know how to test my statement, then you may refuse to accept it. That is another thing. You may also accept iron as gold. That is your ignorance: you do not know what gold is. But if you actually know what God is, you will accept Kåñëa as God. There is no doubt about it.

So this is the common platform—Bhagavad-gétä. Everyone, come and take to Kåñëa consciousness. Understand God and learn how to love Him, and your life will be perfect.

Puñöa Kåñëa: But many people claim to have the best religion, Çréla Prabhupäda.

Çréla Prabhupäda: But we have to look at the result. how will we decide what is real religion? Sa vai puàsäà paro dharmaù yato bhaktir adhokñaje: by seeing whether the followers have learned how to love God. If one has no love of God, then what is the use of claiming that one's religion is the best? Where is the sign of love of Godhead? That is to be seen. Everyone will say, "My understanding is the best." But there must be practical proof.

If someone claims to have the best religion, we ask, "Tell us how to love God. What is your process of loving God? If you do not know your relationship with God and others' relationship with God, then how can you love God?" That process of loving God is lacking. Nobody can give a clear conception of God. If you have no understanding of what God is, where is the question of love? Love is not mere fantasy or imagination. You cannot love air. You love a person, a beautiful person. If you merely say, "I love the air, I love the sky," what question is there of love? There must be a person. So who is that person we want to love?

Unfortunately, most people have no personal conception of God. Nor can they describe the Lord's personal beauty, knowledge, strength —His fullness in the six personal opulences. There is no such description. They have some conception of God, but actually they do not know what God is. But religion means you must know God and love Him. Love is something tangible. It is not merely fantasy or imagination. So we Kåñëa conscious people accept Kåñëa as God, and we are worshiping Kåñëa, and we are making progress.

Puñöa Kåñëa: Recently a priest visited us and admitted that he didn't know what God looks like. He couldn't say anything about God, but he said he loved God.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Then? What kind of love is it?

Puñöa Kåñëa: Nor did he say his people were very enthusiastic about coming to church. He said, "At best they come once a week." He said that's all that is necessary.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Well, love does not mean that you come once a week to my house. Love means you come to my house every day, give me some present, and take something from me. Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé describes the symptoms of love in his

 Upadeñämåta [4]
dadäti pratigåhëäti
guhyam äkhyäti påcchati
bhuìkte bhojayate caiva
ñaò-vidhaà préti-lakñaëam

If you love somebody, you must give him something, and you must accept something from him. You must disclose your mind to him, and he should disclose his mind to you. And you should give him some eatable, and whatever eatable thing he offers, you accept. These six kinds of exchange develop love.

But if you do not even know the person, then where is the question of love? Suppose you love some boy or some girl, then you will give some present, and he or she gives you some present—that develops love. You give something to eat, and whatever he or she gives you to eat, you eat. You disclose your mind: "My dear such-and-such, I love you. This is my ambition." And he or she makes some disclosure. These are the exchanges of love.

But if there is no person-to-person meeting, where is the question of love? If I claim to love somebody, but I visit his house only once a week and ask,"Please give me such-and-such," where is the exchange of love? Love means there is some exchange. If you love somebody but you have not given anything to that person or taken anything from him, where is the love?

The conclusion is, religion means to love God, and that means you must know who God is. There is no alternati You must know the person who is God. Then you can have loving exchanges with Him. That we are teaching. We are asking our disciples to rise early in the morning and offer maìgala ärati, then bhoga ärati, to the Lord in His form as the Deity in the temple. Are we such fools and rascals that we are wasting time worshiping a "doll"? Sometimes people think like that. But that is not a fact. When you enter the temple, you know definitely, "Here is Kåñëa. He is God, and we must love Him like this." That is the superexcellence of this Kåñëa consciousness movement. We do everything definitely, on the positive platform. Is that clear? Does anyone have any further question?

Pradyumna: Çréla Prabhupäda, you're saying we must know God before we can love Him. So that means devotional service is preceded by knowledge.

Çréla Prabhupäda: Yes, that is the process given in the Bhagavad-gétä. There are eighteen chapters, and the whole eighteen chapters are education—how to know God. When Arjuna at last comes to complete awareness, he accepts, "Kåñëa, You are paraà brahma, the Supreme Personality of Godhead." Then Arjuna surrendered, as Kåñëa advised—sarva-dharmän parityajya [Bg. 18.66]. But unless you know God, how will you surrender? If some third-class man comes and says, "Surrender to me," will you do that? "Why should I surrender to you?" You must know, "Now, here is God. I must surrender." Eighteen chapters describe God and how to know God, and then Kåñëa proposes, "Surrender unto Me." Then Arjuna does it: "Yes." So without knowing God, how can you surrender to Him? It is not possible.

So the Bhagavad-gétä is the science of how to know God. The preliminary science. If you want to know more, then read Çrémad-Bhägavatam. And if you are in intense love with God, read Caitanya-caritämåta—how your love for God can be still more intensified. That is Caitanya-caritämåta. So Bhagavad-gétä is the preliminary book: to understand God and surrender. And from the surrendering point, further progress—that is Çrémad-Bhägavatam. And when the love is intense, to make it more intensified—that is Caitanya-caritämåta. Caitanya Mahäprabhu was mad after God. He cried, çünyäyitam jagat sarvaà govinda viraheëa me: "I find everything vacant without Kåñëa." That is the supreme ecstasy.

So these things cannot happen without love. If you love somebody and he's not there, you find everything vacant. So Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu felt this way about Kåñëa—lover and beloved. Çünyäyitaà jagat sarvaà govinda viraheëa me: "I see everything vacant without Govinda." That is the supreme stage of love. Is that clear or not?

Pradyumna: There's just one more thing, Çréla Prabhupäda. What's the minimum knowledge one must have to . . .

Çréla Prabhupäda: God is great. That's all. God is great. Kåñëa proved that He's great. Therefore He's God. Everyone says, "God is great." Allah-u-akbar, the Muslims say: "God is great." And Hindus say, paraà brahma: "You are the Supreme Spirit." So God is great. And when Kåñëa was present, He proved that He is all-great. Therefore He's God. If you accept that God is great, and if you find somebody who is great in everything, then He is God. How can you deny it? You can see how great Kåñëa is simply by considering His Bhagavad-gétä. Five thousand years have passed since Kåñëa spoke Bhagavad-gétä, and still it is accepted as the greatest book of knowledge all over the world. Even people from other religions who are really learned accept it. That is proof of the greatness of Kåñëa—this knowledge. Who can give such knowledge? That is the proof that He is God. Kåñëa has all opulences in full, including knowledge. Other than here in Kåñëa's words, where is such knowledge throughout the whole world? Every line is sublime knowledge. If you study Bhagavad-gétä scrutinizingly, you'll understand that Kåñëa is the Supreme Lord.

CAT 13: THE WAY TO PEACE

Puñöa Kåñëa: Next question, Çréla Prabhupäda. "Do you envision a different role for the Vedic culture in the Western countries, where the influence of other great religions has been felt for centuries?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: No. There is no "different role." God is one. God cannot be two. As Kåñëa states in the Bhagavad-gétä [7.7], mattaù parataraà nänyat kiïcid asti dhanaïjaya: "There is no authority superior to Me." That is God. Now people have to understand that Kåñëa is God. There is no "different role" for the Vedic culture. The role is the same worldwide. Five thousand years ago, Kåñëa said, "I am the supreme authority. There is no authority superior to Me." He is still so. Therefore we are simply attempting to introduce Kåñëa.

Previously nobody attempted to introduce the supreme authority, Kåñëa, all over the world. We are just trying to introduce Kåñëa, following the orders of Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu, who appeared five hundred years ago. He is Kåñëa, and He wanted this Kåñëa consciousness to be spread all over the world:

påthivéte äche yata nagarädi-gräma
sarvatra pracära haibe mora näma

"In every town and village throughout the world," said Lord Caitanya, "the chanting of My holy name will be heard." Kåñëa is not just for India. He is for everyone, because He is God. In Bhagavad-gétä He affirms, ahaà béja-pradaù pitä: "I am the seed-giving father of all living entities"—not just the living entities in the human society, but also all other living entities, like the aquatics, the insects, the plants, the birds, and the beasts.

Everything is there in the Vedic culture, but this culture of Kåñëa consciousness, which is summarized in Bhagavad-gétä As It Is, had not been preached properly. Everyone had interpreted Bhagavad-gétä in his own way, to satisfy his own whims. We are just trying for the first time to present Bhagavad-gétä as it is, and it is becoming effective. So this is not a "different role" for the Vedic culture. It is the actual role. Nobody had tried for it; therefore Kåñëa had been unknown in the Western countries. But even though we have been attempting to introduce Him for only a few years, still, because it is reality, Kåñëa consciousness is being accepted. So it is not a new role for the Vedic culture. The role is already there—to preach Kåñëa consciousness.

That is Caitanya Mahäprabhu's vision. He says especially to people born in India,

bhärata-bhümite manuñya-janma haila yära
janma särthaka kari' kara para-upakära
 [Cc. Ädi 9.41]

"Anyone who has taken his birth as a human being in India, Bhäratavarña, should make his life successful and work for the upliftment of the whole world." Indians are meant for this business—for the upliftment of the whole world—because all over the world people are unaware of Kåñëa. So anyone who is born in India should attempt to broadcast the message of Bhagavad-gétä and Kåñëa. That is the order of Caitanya Mahäprabhu.

This is not a new role for the Vedic culture. The role is already there. Five hundred years ago, Caitanya Mahäprabhu spoke of it. But all the various swamis and yogis who came here—they never introduced Kåñëa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Now it is being done, and people are accepting, naturally. This is the Kåñëa consciousness movement.

So if everyone joins—either Indian or non-Indian—in this movement, there will be one religion and there will be peace. Peace will prevail. This is the only way.

bhoktäraà yajïa-tapasäà
sarva-loka-maheçvaram
suhådaà sarva-bhütänäà
jïätvä mäà çäntim åcchati
 [Bg. 5.29]

"A person in full consciousness of Me, knowing Me to be the ultimate beneficiary of all sacrifices and austerities, the Supreme Lord of all planets and demigods, and the benefactor and well-wisher of all living entities, attains peace from the pangs of material miseries." This is the way to attain çänti, peace. Understand Kåñëa—that He is the supreme enjoyer, the supreme proprietor, and the supreme friend of everyone. "Accept Kåñëa as your friend. You'll be happy." This is the message of Kåñëa consciousness.

CAT 14: RETURN TO REAL LIFE

Puñöa Kåñëa: Çréla Prabhupäda, the final question is: "What is your view regarding proselytizing or preaching?"

Çréla Prabhupäda: We are simply attempting to bring people to the real understanding. Kåñëa says, mamaiväàço jéva-bhütaù: [15.7] all living entities are part and parcel of Me. He says, sarva-yoniñu kaunteya  [Bg. 14.4] … ahaà béja-pradaù: "Of all forms of life, I am the seed-giving father." In other words, the natural position is that every living entity—animals, plants, and human beings, including Indians, Americans, Czechs—everyone is part and parcel of Kåñëa.

So our Kåñëa consciousness movement is not a process of trying to convince people of some speculative idea. This movement is actually bringing people to their real position—that they're all part and parcel of Kåñëa. It is not artificial proselytizing: "You are Christian; now become a Hindu." It is not like that. This movement is actually bringing people back to their natural position—part and parcel of God.

The effects of artificial proselytizing will not stand. But when one comes to the real understanding of his position, then that will continue. This Kåñëa consciousness movement is that real understanding—bringing everyone back to his original position. At the present moment everyone is in a diseased condition: people are thinking they are something other than servants of Kåñëa. Now this movement is trying to bring everyone to the position of recognizing that they are eternal servants of Kåñëa.

This movement is not some kind of rubber-stamp proselytizing—"You were Christian; now you are Hindu." After all, if one does not know what his position is, what benefit will he derive by simply being stamped "Hindu"?

Puñöa Kåñëa: No benefit. He'll still be in ignorance of his real, spiritual identity.

Çréla Prabhupäda: If you keep someone on the ignorant platform, then what is the benefit of making a Christian or a Muslim into a Hindu? No, artificially changing someone into a Hindu will not help. One must know the philosophy of life. One must know what God is. One must learn how to love God. That is real life.