Acintya-bhedadheda-tattva
The Sruti on the Subject of
Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva
11.1
eko vasi sarvabhutamtaratma
ekam rupam bahudha yah karoti
tam atmastham ye' nupasyanti dhiras-
tesam sukham sasvatam
netaresam
Although His form is one, the Supersoul, who is the
indwelling witness
and controller of all living beings, is manifest in
innumerable ways. The wise
who can see that Supreme Soul within his heart becomes
peaceful and enjoys
transcendental bliss. (Katha
Upanisad 2.2.12)
Srimad
Bhagavatam on Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva
11.2
rte 'rtham yat pratiyeta na pratiyeta catmani
tad vidyad atmano
mayam yathabhaso yatha tamah
O Brahma, whatever appears to be of any value, if it has
no relation to Me,
has no reality. It is My
illusory energy that reflection which appears to be in
darkness. (Bhag.
2.9.34)
11.3
yatha mahanti bhutani bhutesuccavacesv anu
pravistany apravistani tatha tesu na tesv aham
O Brahma, please know that the universal elements enter
into the cosmos
and at the same time do not enter into the comos; similarly, I Myself also exist
within everything created, and at the same time I am outside
of everything.
(Bhag. 2.9.35)
11.4
yatra yena yato yasya yasmai yad yad yatha yada
syad idam bhagavan saksat pradhana-purusesvarah
You are the substratum, the agent, and the instrument of
the universe.
You are its source and its
object or purpose. Whenever or whatever form it
assumes is You. As the universe evolves, all the causes
thereof, including time
and manner, are You, the Almighty Lord, the controller of
both prakrti (the
enjoyed) and purusa
(the enjoyer) and who transcends them both.
(Bhag. 10.85.4)
Smrti
on Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva
11.5
maya tatam idam sarvam jagad avyakta-murtina
mat-sthani
sarva-bhutani na caham tesv avasthitah
In My unmanifest form I pervade
this entire universe. All beings are in
Me, but I am not in them. (Bhagavad-gita 9.4)
11.6
na ca mat-sthani bhutani pasya me yogam aisvaram
bhuta-bhrn na ca bhuta-stho mamatma bhuta-bhavanah
And yet everything that is created does not rest in Me.
Behold My mystic
opulence! Although I am the maintainer of all living entities
and although I am
everywhere, I am not a part of this cosmic manifestation; for I
am the very
source of creation. (Bhagavad-gita
9.5)
Srila Jiva Gosvami on Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva
11.7
ekam eva tat parama-tattvam svabhavikacintya-saktya
sarvadaiva svarupa-
tad-rupa-vaibhava-jiva-pradhana-rupena caturdhavatisthate
suryantarmandalastha-teja iva mandala
tad-bahir-gatarasmi-tat-prattichavi-rupena.
durghata-ghata-katvam hyacintyatvam
The Absolute Truth is one. His natural characteristic is
that He has incon-
ceivable potency.
His inconceivable potencies are reposed in four different
stages: His personal form (svarupa), the expansions of His divine form (tad-
rupa-vaibhava),
the jivas, and the material
ingredients (pradhana). With re-
gard to the sun,
there is the sungod, the internal power of the sun,
and that
power when it is expanded as the external rays of the sun.
Then there is the
shadow of the sun, that is to say, the sun's reflection
which is in darkness, far
from the sun's influence. This illustration is used as an
example. The point of
the example is that in the same way as the sun appears in
this fourfold manifes-
tation (the sungod, its internal power, its external rays, and its
shadow), there is
one eternal Supreme Truth (the Lord) whose form is
eternal, but who is pos-
sessed of different
potencies: svarupa-sakti, jiva-sakti, and maya-sakti.
There seems to be a contradiction in this matter between
the Lord being
one eternal Absolute Truth and His simultaneously
possessing inconceivable
potency. How is it possible to understand such a
contradiction? To that it is
said acintya means beyond the jiva's
capacity to understand. An event which is
extremely rare or unlikely, even physically impossible, is
inconceivable. For
the Supreme Lord, however, nothing is impossible for He
has inconceivable
power. [Therefore the Lord's oneness with (and distinction
from) His energy is
said to be inconceivable acintya-bhedabheda-vada.]
(Bhagavata-sandarbha 16)
Note: Srila Prabhupada paraphrased this section of Jiva Gosvami's
Bhagavata-sandarbha as follows:
Srila Jiva Gosvami states in Bhagavata-Sandarbha
(16) That by His po-
tencies, which act
in natural sequences beyond the scope of the specula-
tive human mind, the Supreme Transcendence,
the summum bonum, eter-
nally and simultaneously exists in four
transcendental features: His per-
sonality, His impersonal effulgence, His
potential parts and parcels (the
living beings), and the principal cause of all
causes. The Supreme Whole
is compared to the sun, which also exists
in four features, namely the
personality of the sun-god, the glare of his
glowing sphere, the sun-rays
inside the sun planet, and the sun's
reflections in many other objects. The
ambition to corroborate the existence of the
transcendental Absolute Truth
by limited conjectural endeavors cannot be
fulfilled, because He is be-
yond the scope of our limited speculative
minds. In an honest search for
truth we must admit that His powers are
inconceivable to our tiny brains.
The exploration of space has demanded the work of the
greatest scientists
of the world, yet there are countless
problems regarding even fundamen-
tal knowledge of the material creation that
bewilder such scientists. Such
material knowledge is far removed from the
spiritual nature, and there-
fore the acts and arrangements of the
Absolute Truth, are, beyond all
doubts, inconceivable.
11.8
apare tu "tarko-pratisthanat"
bhede' pya-bhede' pi
nirmaryada-dosa-santati-darsanena bhinnataya
cintaryitumasakayatvadabhedah sadhyantah
tad-vad-abhinnatayapi cintayiuamasakyatvadbhedamapi sadhayanto'
cintyabhedabhedavada svikurvanti.
tatra badara-pauranika-saivanam
mate bhedabhedau bhaskaramate
ca.
mayavadinam tatra bhedamso vyavaharika eva pratitiko va.
gautama-kanada-jaimini-kapila-patanjalimate tu bheda eva.
sri ramanuja-madhvacaryamate cetyapi sarvatriki prasiddhih.
svamate tvacintyabhedabhedaveva acintyasaktimayatvaditi
Other sampradayas
of Vedantists admit that boundless essays, disserta-
tions, and theses can never be established as truth through
any amount of argu-
ment. Still, they
think that the principle of oneness and difference existing to-
gether in the same
place transgresses the boundaries of reality. They take it
that this is a symptom of the fault of neglecting the
nature of universality that
is, that if difference is true, then it must be true
universally, and if oneness is
true then it must be true universally. Following this
faulty logic they therefore
think that these two difference and non-difference cannot
independently co-
exist. There cannot be both duality and oneness, they
reason; one of these
doctrines must have supremacy over the other. Those who think
it is one, find
that their attempts to practice the doctrine of oneness
are impossible. In the
same way, those who attempt to practice a doctrine of
absolute difference will
find their position untenable. In this way, both the practitioners
of absolute
oneness and the practitioners of absolute duality will be
unable to realize their
philosophy. Therefore, in light of the difficulties of trying to
realize oneness
without distinction or distinction without oneness, the
principle of acintya-
bhedabheda-vada, or inconceivable, simultaneous oneness and
distinction, has
been accepted as the highest harmonizing principle.
The true opinion of the sage Badasa
and the Puranas is bhedabheda-vada,
oneness and difference. Even the followers of Siva sometimes
accept this. For
example, the commentator Bhaskara
accepts bhedabheda-vada
in the idea that
there is a difference between the articles offered to the
Deity and the Deity
Himself. In the opinion of the mayavadis, the branches of difference
are merely
vyavaharika, mundane or apparent. Gautama,
Kanada, Jaimini, Kapila,
and
Patanjali admit the existence of distinction. In the opinions
of Ramanuja and
Madhva's this principle reaches a higher level of perfection. Ramanuja's
visistadvaita philosophy supports difference and nondifference,
and Madhva's
suddha-dvaita philosophy
supports the principle of difference. The Supreme
Lord has inconceivable
potency; and He supports the conclusion of acintya-
bhedabheda-vada. This is our conclusion. (Paramatma-Sandarbha, Sarva-
samvadini-tika, Jiva Gosvami)
The Brahma-sutras
Support the View of Sakti-parinamavada
11.9
vyasera sutrete kahe 'parinama'-vada
'vyasa bhranta' bali'
parinama-vade isvara hayena vikari
eta kahi' 'vivarta'-vada sthapana ye kari
vastutah parinama-vada sei se
pramana
dehe atma-buddhi ei vivartera sthana
avicintya-sakti-yukta sri-bhagavan
icchaya jagad-rupe paya parinama
tathapi acintya-saktye haya avikari
prakrta cintamani tahe drstanta ye dhari
nana ratna-rasi haya cintamani
haite
tathapiha mani rahe svarupe avikrte
prakrta-vastute
yadi acintya-sakti haya
isvarera acintya-sakti, ithe ki vismaya
In Vedanta-Sutra,
Srila Vyasadeva has described that everything is but a
transformation of the energy of the Lord. Sankaracarya has misled
the world,
however, by claiming that Vyasadeva was mistaken. Thus he has
raised great
opposition to theism throughout the world. According to
Sankaracarya, by
accepting the theory of the transformation of the energy of the
Lord, one cre-
ates an illusion by
indirectly accepting that the Absolute Truth is transformed.
Transformation of energy is a
proven fact. It is the false bodily conception of
the self that is an illusion. The Supreme Personality of
Godhead is opulent in
all respects. By His inconceivable energies, therefore,
He has transformed the
material cosmic manifestation. Using the example of a
touchstone, which by its
energy turns iron to gold and yet remains the same, we can
understand that
although the Supreme Personality of Godhead transforms His
innumerable
energies, He remains unchanged. Although a touchstone produces
many vari-
eties of valuable
jewels, it nevertheless remains the same. It does not change its
original form. If there is such inconceivable potency in
material objects, why
should we not believe in the inconceivable potency of the
Supreme Personality
of Godhead? (Cc.
Adi 7.121-127)
The Meaning of Parinama-vada and Vivarta-vada
11.10
satattvato' nyatha pratha
vikara ityudiritah
atattvato' nyatha pratha
vikarta ityudahrtah
When a real substance takes another form it is called
vikara, or transfor-
mation. An example
of this is the transformation of milk into yogurt. When
something is mistaken for something else it is called vivarta,
or illusion, like
when a rope is taken as a snake. (Sadananda Yogindra, Vedanta-sara 59)
Thus ends the Eleventh Jewel
of Gaudiya Kanthahara, entitled Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva